Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Cationic surfactant mixing with anionic

Asphalt emulsions are dispersioas of asphalt ia water that are stabilized iato micelles with either an anionic or cationic surfactant. To manufacture an emulsion, hot asphalt is mixed with water and surfactant ia a coUoid mill that produces very small particles of asphalt oa the order of 3 p.m. These small particles of asphalt are preveated from agglomerating iato larger particles by a coatiag of water that is held ia place by the surfactant. If the asphalt particles agglomerate, they could settle out of the emulsion. The decision on whether a cationic or anionic surfactant is used depends on the appHcation. Cationic stabilized emulsions are broken, ie, have the asphalt settle out, by contact with metal or siHcate materials as weU as by evaporation of the water. Siace most rocks are siHcate-based materials, cationic emulsions are commonly used for subbase stabilization and other similar appHcations. In contrast, anionic emulsions only set or break by water evaporation thus an anionic emulsion would be used to make a cold patch compound. [Pg.320]

The method developed by Epton [212,213] became the universally accepted method for the analysis of active matter of anionic and cationic surfactants. Epton s method, also known as the two-phase titration, is based on the titration of the anionic surfactant with cetylpyridinium bromide, a cationic surfactant, in the presence of methylene blue as indicator. A solution of the anionic surfactant is mixed with the indicator dissolved in dilute sulfuric acid, followed by further addition of chloroform, and then it is titrated with the cationic surfactant. Methylene blue forms a complex with the anionic salt that is soluble in chloroform, giving the layer a blue color. As the titration proceeds there is a slow transference of color to the water layer until the equivalence point. At the equivalence point colors of the chloroform and water layers are visually the same. On successive additions of titrant the chloroform layer lightens in shade and finally becomes colorless. [Pg.279]

Surfactants employed for w/o-ME formation, listed in Table 1, are more lipophilic than those employed in aqueous systems, e.g., for micelles or oil-in-water emulsions, having a hydrophilic-lipophilic balance (HLB) value of around 8-11 [4-40]. The most commonly employed surfactant for w/o-ME formation is Aerosol-OT, or AOT [sodium bis(2-ethylhexyl) sulfosuccinate], containing an anionic sulfonate headgroup and two hydrocarbon tails. Common cationic surfactants, such as cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) and trioctylmethyl ammonium bromide (TOMAC), have also fulfilled this purpose however, cosurfactants (e.g., fatty alcohols, such as 1-butanol or 1-octanol) must be added for a monophasic w/o-ME (Winsor IV) system to occur. Nonionic and mixed ionic-nonionic surfactant systems have received a great deal of attention recently because they are more biocompatible and they promote less inactivation of biomolecules compared to ionic surfactants. Surfactants with two or more hydrophobic tail groups of different lengths frequently form w/o-MEs more readily than one-tailed surfactants without the requirement of cosurfactant, perhaps because of their wedge-shaped molecular structure [17,41]. [Pg.472]

Ong et al. [134] found that several hydrophilic anionic, non ionic, or cationic surfactants can alleviate the deleterious effect of magnesium stearate over-mixing on dissolution from capsules when added with the lubricant in a ratio as low as 1 5 (w/w). These successful surfactants were sodium A-lauroyl sarcosinate, sodium stearoyl-2-lactylate, sodium stearate, polox-amer 188, cetylpyridinium chloride, and sodium lauryl sulfate. The lipophilic surfactant glyceryl monostearate did not alleviate the magnesium stearate mixing effect. A reduction in thier particle size was shown to enhance effectiveness, particularly in the case of surfactants with low solubility and slow dissolution rate. [Pg.368]

BASIS OF MANUAL PHOTOMETRIC TITRATION. The determination of anionic surfactants by a photometric titration employs a cationic indicator to form a coloured complex with the surfactant which is insoluble in water but readily soluble in chlorinated solvents (1 ). The end point of the titration occurs when there is a loss of colour from the organic phase. A considerable improvement in this technique is achieved by the use of a mixture of anionic and cationic dyes (4 ), for example disulphine blue and dimidium bromide (Herring s indicator (3)). The sequence of colour changes which occurs during the two phase titration of an anionic surfactant (AS) with a cationic titrant (CT) using a mixed indicator consisting of an anionic indicator (AD) and cationic indicator (CD) is summarised in Scheme 1 ... [Pg.263]

Howard [27] determined dissolved aluminium in seawater by the micelle-enhanced fluorescence of its lumogallion complex. Several surfactants (to enhance fluorescence and minimise interferences), used for the determination of aluminium at very low concentrations (below 0.5 pg/1) in seawaters, were compared. The surfactants tested in preliminary studies were anionic (sodium lauryl sulfate), non-ionic (Triton X-100, Nonidet P42, NOPCO, and Tergital XD), and cationic (cetyltrimethylammonium bromide). Based on the degree of fluorescence enhancement and ease of use, Triton X-100 was selected for further study. Sample solutions (25 ml) in polyethylene bottles were mixed with acetate buffer (pH 4.7, 2 ml) lumogallion solution (0.02%, 0.3 ml) and 1,10-phenanthroline (1.0 ml to mask interferences from iron). Samples were heated to 80 °C for 1.5 h, cooled, and shaken with neat surfactant (0.15 ml) before fluorescence measurements were made. This procedure had a detection limit at the 0.02 pg/1 level. The method was independent of salinity and could therefore be used for both freshwater and seawater samples. [Pg.130]

Tb clarify the effect of addition of a cationic HC surfactant on phase separation behavior in the mixed monolayers of anionic HC and FC surfactants polyion complexed with cationic polymers, the mixed monolayers containing three amphiphilic components complexed with PVA were transferred on various substrate plates and studied by AFM, FFM, SSPM, and SIMS. As a cationic surfactant, ODTMAC was examined. [Pg.201]

Zhang et al. [135] have studied the physicochemical behavior of mixtures of -dodecyl-/l-D-maltoside with anionic, cationic and nonionic surfactants in aqueous solutions. To acquire information on the property of mixed micelles, the characteristic change of pyrene with changes in polarity was monitored. The polarity parameter at low concentrations was found to be 0.5-0.6. [Pg.176]

Surfactants. Surfactants and other amphiphilic compounds are very versatile materials when mixed with water and/or nonpolar compounds. For this reason, many different ways have been proposed to use surfactants to modify underground flow patterns in various types of EOR. One of these proposals, coprecipitation of a cationic and an anionic surfactant to clog cracks or pores in highly permeable rock zones, might prove useful for gas flooding (K. L. Stellner, J. C. Amente,... [Pg.10]

Oil-in-water creams, for topical use, generally contain mixed emulsifiers/surfactants one of which is a water soluble surfactant with a high HLB, the other being an amphiphile, usually a long chain fatty alcohol (e.g., of chain length C14 to Cig) or acid (e.g., palmitic or stearic). The water soluble surfactant may be anionic (e.g., sodium lauryl sulphate), cationic (e.g., cetri-mide), or non-ionic (e.g., cetomacrogol. Tweens). [Pg.3591]

Despite the efficiency of DR cationic surfactant solutions and several successful large-scale field tests, commercial use of these solutions has not been widespread largely because of their slow biodegradation properties. A new series of biodegradable mixed zwitterionic/anionic surfactant solutions, which can be disposed of by normal sewage treatment, has been developed by Akzo Nobel with excellent field test results in the primary system of the same district heating system in Herning, Denmark. [Pg.776]


See other pages where Cationic surfactant mixing with anionic is mentioned: [Pg.203]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.773]    [Pg.355]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.352]    [Pg.744]    [Pg.159]    [Pg.542]    [Pg.251]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.217]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.218]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.389]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.258]    [Pg.286]    [Pg.329]    [Pg.346]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.685]    [Pg.269]    [Pg.5580]    [Pg.223]    [Pg.256]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.1564]    [Pg.183]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.2433]    [Pg.1729]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.138 ]




SEARCH



Anionic cationic

Anionic surfactants

Cation anion

Cation with anions

Cations with

Mixed surfactants

Surfactants mixing

© 2024 chempedia.info