Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Micellar catalysts

This chapter will only deal with catalytic systems covalently attached to the support. Dendrimer [96-101], hyperbranched polymer [102, 103], or other polymer [100] encapsulated catalysts, micellar catalysis [104] and non-cova-lently bound catalysts (via ionic [105,106], fluorous, etc. intercations) are not being treated. Also catalysis with colloidal polymers [ 107,108] and biocatalysts, such as enzymes and RNA, will not be reviewed here. [Pg.19]

Surfactants have also been of interest for their ability to support reactions in normally inhospitable environments. Reactions such as hydrolysis, aminolysis, solvolysis, and, in inorganic chemistry, of aquation of complex ions, may be retarded, accelerated, or differently sensitive to catalysts relative to the behavior in ordinary solutions (see Refs. 205 and 206 for reviews). The acid-base chemistry in micellar solutions has been investigated by Drummond and co-workers [207]. A useful model has been the pseudophase model [206-209] in which reactants are either in solution or solubilized in micelles and partition between the two as though two distinct phases were involved. In inverse micelles in nonpolar media, water is concentrated in the micellar core and reactions in the micelle may be greatly accelerated [206, 210]. The confining environment of a solubilized reactant may lead to stereochemical consequences as in photodimerization reactions in micelles [211] or vesicles [212] or in the generation of radical pairs [213]. [Pg.484]

In this section the influence of micelles of cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB), sodium dodecylsulfate (SDS) and dodecyl heptaoxyethylene ether (C12E7) on the Diels-Alder reaction of 5.1a-g with 5.2 in the absence of Lewis-add catalysts is described (see Scheme 5.1). Note that the dienophiles can be divided into nonionic (5.1a-e), anionic (5.If) and cationic (5.1g) species. A comparison of the effect of nonionic (C12E7), anionic (SDS) and cationic (CTAB) micelles on the rates of their reaction with 5.2 will assess of the importance of electrostatic interactions in micellar catalysis or inhibition. [Pg.133]

Further evidence for an increased efficiency of complexation in the presence of micellar aggregates with bivalent metal counterions is presented in Table 5.4. The apparent rate constants of the reaction of 5.1c with 5.2 in the presence of micelles of Co(DS)2, Ni(DS)2, Cu(DS)2 and Zn(DS)2 are compared to the rate constants for the corresponding bivalent metal ion - dienophile complexes in the absence of micelles. The latter data are not dependent on the efficiency of the formation of the catalyst - dienophile complex whereas possible incomplete binding will certainly be reflected in the former. The good correlations between 1 and and the absence of a correlation between and... [Pg.140]

Interestingly, at very low concentrations of micellised Qi(DS)2, the rate of the reaction of 5.1a with 5.2 was observed to be zero-order in 5.1 a and only depending on the concentration of Cu(DS)2 and 5.2. This is akin to the turn-over and saturation kinetics exhibited by enzymes. The acceleration relative to the reaction in organic media in the absence of catalyst, also approaches enzyme-like magnitudes compared to the process in acetonitrile (Chapter 2), Cu(DS)2 micelles accelerate the Diels-Alder reaction between 5.1a and 5.2 by a factor of 1.8710 . This extremely high catalytic efficiency shows how a combination of a beneficial aqueous solvent effect, Lewis-acid catalysis and micellar catalysis can lead to tremendous accelerations. [Pg.143]

Chapter 5 also demonstrates that a combination of Lewis-acid catalysis and micellar catalysis can lead to accelerations of enzyme-like magnitudes. Most likely, these accelerations are a consequence of an efficient interaction between the Lewis-acid catalyst and the dienophile, both of which have a high affinity for the Stem region of the micelle. Hence, hydrophobic interactions and Lewis-acid catalysis act cooperatively. Unfortunately, the strength of the hydrophobic interaction, as offered by the Cu(DS)2 micellar system, was not sufficient for extension of Lewis-acid catalysis to monodentate dienophiles. [Pg.163]

The above enantioselectivities are obviously complex functions of many factors, perhaps even more complex than in natural enzymes. Complexity is partly due to the present co-micellar system in which it is difficult to analyze separately the interaction of the substrate with the achiral micelle, and that of the substrate with the catalyst complex. [Pg.171]

Sodium dodecyl sulfate and hydrogen dodecyl sulfate have been used as catalysts in the denitrosation iV-nitroso-iV-methyl-p-toluenesulfonamide [138]. The kinetics of condensation of benzidine and p-anisidine with p-dimethylamino-benzaldehyde was studied by spectrophotometry in the presence of micelles of sodium dodecyl sulfate, with the result that the surfactant increases the rate of reaction [188]. The kinetics of reversible complexation of Ni(II) and Fe(III) with oxalatopentaaminecobalt(III) has been investigated in aqueous micellar medium of sodium dodecyl sulfate. The reaction occurs exclusively on the micellar surface [189]. Vitamin E reacts rapidly with the peroxidized linoleic acid present in linoleic acid in micellar sodium dodecyl sulfate solutions, whereas no significant reaction occurs in ethanol solution [190]. [Pg.275]

Subsequently, cationic rhodium catalysts are also found to be effective for the regio- and stereoselective hydrosilation of alkynes in aqueous media. Recently, Oshima et al. reported a rhodium-catalyzed hydrosilylation of alkynes in an aqueous micellar system. A combination of [RhCl(nbd)]2 and bis-(diphenylphosphi no)propanc (dppp) were shown to be effective for the ( >selective hydrosilation in the presence of sodium dodecylsulfate (SDS), an anionic surfactant, in water.86 An anionic surfactant is essential for this ( )-selective hydrosilation, possibly because anionic micelles are helpful for the formation of a cationic rhodium species via dissociation of the Rh-Cl bond. For example, Triton X-100, a neutral surfactant, gave nonstereoselective hydrosilation whereas methyltrioctylammonium chloride, a cationic surfactant, resulted in none of the hydrosilation products. It was also found that the selectivity can be switched from E to Z in the presence of sodium iodide (Eq. 4.47). [Pg.122]

GTP was employed for the synthesis of block copolymers with the first block PDMAEMA and the second PDEAEMA, poly[2-(diisopropylamino)e-thyl methacrylate], PDIPAEMA or poly[2-(N-morpholino)ethyl methacrylate], PM EM A (Scheme 33) [87]. The reactions took place under an inert atmosphere in THF at room temperature with l-methoxy-l-trimethylsiloxy-2-methyl-1-propane, MTS, as the initiator and tetra-n-butyl ammonium bibenzoate, TBABB, as the catalyst. Little or no homopolymer contamination was evidenced by SEC analysis. Copolymers in high yields with controlled molecular weights and narrow molecular weight distributions were obtained in all cases. The micellar properties of these materials were studied in aqueous solutions. [Pg.51]

Sc(OTf)3-catalyzed aldol reactions have been successfully performed in micellar systems (Scheme 15).59 The catalyst activity is remarkably enhanced by adding a small amount of a surfactant. Allylation60 and Mannich-type reactions61 also proceed smoothly in water in the presence of a catalytic amount of Sc(OTf)3 and a surfactant. [Pg.405]

The catalytic activities of Cu(II), Co(II) and Mn(II) are considerably enhanced by sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) in the autoxidation of H2DTBC (51). The maximum catalytic activity was found in the CMC region. It was assumed that the micelles incorporate the catalysts and the short metal-metal distances increase the activity in accordance with the kinetic model discussed above. The concentration of the micelles increases at higher SDS concentrations. Thus, the concentrations of the catalyst and the substrate decrease in the micellar region and, as a consequence, the catalytic reaction becomes slower again. [Pg.418]

An example of the use of PGSE NMR spectroscopy can be found in the studies of Selke et al. [33], who investigated the dependence of enantioselectivity on the distribution of a chiral hydrogenation catalyst between aqueous and micellar phases. When a compound is incorporated into a micelle, its mobility is much lower compared to its mobility in solution. This effect is exactly what is probed with PGSE NMR. The calculated diffusion coefficient is a time-averaged value of the lower diffusion coefficient of the catalyst incorporated into the micelles, and of the diffusion coefficient of the free catalyst. An increased amount of micelle-embedded catalyst was found to lead to an increased enantioselectivity. [Pg.309]

Upon reaction, the heterogenized catalyst can be easily separated from the reaction mixture by filtration and then recycled. The hydro-phobic substrate is microemulsified in water and subjected to an orga-nometallic catalyst, which is entrapped within a partially hydrophobized sol-gel matrix. The surfactant molecules, which carry the hydrophobic substrate, adsorb/desorb reversibly on the surface of the sol-gel matrix breaking the micellar structure, spilling their substrate load into the porous medium that contains the catalyst. A catalytic reaction then takes place within the ceramic material to form the desired products that are extracted by the desorbing surfactant, carrying the emulsified product back into the solution. [Pg.123]

Bifunctional micellar catalysis has also been reported by Moss and coworkers (Moss et al., 1975, 1977) and Tonellato (1977). In contrast to the situation of the mixed micelle, the acetylimidazole intermediate was not observable in the reaction using the bifunctional catalyst [31]. In a preparative... [Pg.457]

Bromomethylation of arenes using 1,3,5-trioxane and hydrobromic acid is catalysed by the addition of a phase-transfer catalyst. Yields in excess of 90% are attained using (tetradecyl)trimethylammonium bromide under relatively mild conditions for a range of arenes [55]. Tetra-n-butylammonium bromide is ineffective, suggesting the catalytic effect may be micellar. [Pg.65]

Examples of the Michael-type addition of carbanions, derived from activated methylene compounds, with electron-deficient alkenes under phase-transfer catalytic conditions have been reported [e.g. 1-17] (Table 6.16). Although the basic conditions are normally provided by sodium hydroxide or potassium carbonate, fluoride and cyanide salts have also been used [e.g. 1, 12-14]. Soliddiquid two-phase systems, with or without added organic solvent [e.g. 15-18] and polymer-supported catalysts [11] have been employed, as well as normal liquiddiquid conditions. The micellar ammonium catalysts have also been used, e.g. for the condensation of p-dicarbonyl compounds with but-3-en-2-one [19], and they are reported to be superior to tetra-n-butylammonium bromide at low base concentrations. [Pg.274]

The metal-catalysed autoxidation of alkenes to produce ketones (Wacker reaction) is promoted by the presence of quaternary ammonium salts [14]. For example, using copper(II) chloride and palladium(II) chloride in benzene in the presence of cetyltrimethylammonium bromide, 1-decene is converted into 2-decanone (73%), 1,7-octadiene into 2,7-octadione (77%) and vinylcyclohexane into cyclo-hexylethanone (22%). Benzyltriethylammonium chloride and tetra-n-butylammo-nium hydrogen sulphate are ineffective catalysts. It has been suggested that the process is not micellar, although the catalysts have the characteristics of those which produce micelles. The Wacker reaction is also catalysed by rhodium and ruthenium salts in the presence of a quaternary ammonium salt. Generally, however, the yields are lower than those obtained using the palladium catalyst and, frequently, several oxidation products are obtained from each reaction [15]. [Pg.461]

In subsequent studies it has been found that a combination of Lewis-acid and micellar catalysis can lead to huge (in fact, enzyme like) rate acceleration in water. In the absence of Lewis-acid catalysts, micelles tend to inhibit Diels-Alder reactions, largely because of the particular nature of the substrate binding sites at the micelle. This problem can be solved by adding Lewis-acid catalysts that bind effectively at the micellar surface. [Pg.160]

Lewis-acid catalysis of Diels-Alder reactions involving bidentate dienophiles in water is possible also if the beneficial effect of water on the catalyzed reaction is reduced relative to pure water. There are no additional effects on endo-exo selectivity. As expected, catalysis by Cu ions is much more efficient than specific-acid catalysis.Using a-amino acids as chiral ligands, Lewis-acid enan-tioselectivity is enhanced in water compared to organic solvents. Micelles, in the absence of Lewis acids, are poor catalysts, but combining Lewis-acid catalysis and micellar catalysis leads to a rate accelaration that is enzyme-like. [Pg.169]


See other pages where Micellar catalysts is mentioned: [Pg.112]    [Pg.863]    [Pg.112]    [Pg.863]    [Pg.2594]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.259]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.188]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.513]    [Pg.444]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.273]    [Pg.348]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.998]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.307]    [Pg.450]    [Pg.1353]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.469]    [Pg.481]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.144]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.150 , Pg.152 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info