Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Canada nuclear power generation

Wojtazek, D., 2015. Euture nuclear power generation in Canada transition to thorium fuelled SCWRs. In Proc. 7th International Conference on Modeling and Simulation in Nuclear Science and Engineering (7ICMSNSE), Ottawa, October 18—21, 2015. [Pg.219]

During the atomic energy developments in the World War II years and for a period thereafter, ihe United States, ihe United Kingdom, and Canada cooperated closely and many of the nuclear scientists of these countries appreciated the merits of heavy water as a moderator. Each of these countries pursued some development of HWRs for commercial power generation, but at different paces and dedication. Only Canada took to the HWR for commercial power generation. See Figs. 25 and 26. [Pg.1113]

Finite-element modelling of effects of past and future glaciation on the host rock of a used nuclear fuel waste vault. Ontario Hydro Nuclear Waste Management Division Report No. 06819-REP-01200-0020 ROO. Written by Atomic Energy of Canada Limited for Ontario Hydro (now Ontario Power Generation), Toronto,... [Pg.292]

Sheppard, M.L, Sheppard, S.C. and Sanipelli, B. (2002). Recommended Biosphere Model Values for Iodine. Nuclear Waste Management Division Report 06819-REP-01200-10090-R00. Ontario Power Generation, Toronto, Canada. Sheppard, M.L and Thibault, D.H. (1991). J. Environ. Qual 20, 101-114. [Pg.117]

Statiis and prospects of propulsion reactor (PR) applications. The PRs for ice-breakers and ships have accumulated about 150 reactor-years of successful operation. Recent developments in the Russian Federation, Canada, China and other countries have demonstrated, that power reactors originally designed for ship propulsion could be used for electricity and heat generation. Use of proven PR technology and new developments on small reactor (SR) presents a broader nuclear power options to meet individual Member States needs for land-based and floating SRs. [Pg.10]

Ontario Power Generation, Canada Autoridad Regulatoria Nuclear, Argentina International Organization for Standardization E. Mennerdahl Systems, Sweden International Atomic Energy Agency Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission, Canada Ministry of Transport, Japan... [Pg.140]

Of course, CPD was more than just a business success. Millions of patients had been treated with its BTUs and isotopes. Much suffering had been alleviated and many lives saved. The medical benefits of its work alone provided ample justification for the Canadian government s investment in atomic research. When AECL s executives gave public addresses on the wonders of the atomic age, they avoided dwelling on the destructive power of the atom. They were enthusiastic about the benefits that society would derive from nuclear power, but Canada had yet to build a nuclear generating station. When they wanted to provide concrete evidence of how atomic research had benefited the world, they spoke of the work of the Commercial Products Division. [Pg.115]

The United States derived about 20 percent of its electricity from nuclear energy in 2002 (EIA, Electric Power Monthly, 2003). The 103 power reactors operating today have a total capacity of nearly 100 gigawatts electric (GWe) and constitute about 13 percent of the installed U.S. electric generation capacity. The current U.S. plants use water as the coolant and neutron moderator (hence called light-water reactors, or LWRs) and rely on the steam Rankine cycle as the thermal-to-electrical power conversion cycle. Other countries use other technologies—notably C02-cooled reactors in the United Kingdom and heavy-water-cooled reactors (HWRs) in Canada and India. [Pg.111]

However, the province of Ontario (Canada) currently has completely eliminated coal-fired power plants from the electrical grid. Some of them were closed, and others were converted to natural gas. Fig. 1.17(a) shows installed capacity and Fig. 1.17(b) shows electricity generation by energy source in the province of Ontario (Canada) in 2015. Analysis of Fig. 1.17(a) shows that in Ontario the major installed capacities in 2015 were nuclear (38%), gas (29%), hydro (25%), and renewables (mainly wind ... [Pg.10]


See other pages where Canada nuclear power generation is mentioned: [Pg.186]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.558]    [Pg.322]    [Pg.1116]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.981]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.314]    [Pg.292]    [Pg.456]    [Pg.717]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.2801]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.300]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.624]    [Pg.1264]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.387]    [Pg.1210]    [Pg.387]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.336]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.712]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.647]    [Pg.718]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.7 ]




SEARCH



Nuclear power

Power generating

Power generation nuclear powered

© 2024 chempedia.info