Calorimeters instrumentation

Adiabatic calorimeter Instrument used to study chemical reactions which have a minimum loss of heat. 

The most basic thermal analysis technique is naturally calorimetry, the measurement of heat. The needed thermal analysis instrument is the calorimeter. Instrumentation, technique, theory and applications of calorimetry are treated in... 

Alternating current calorimeter Instrument for measuring the alternating temperature change produced in a substance by an alternating heating current. 

Differential scanning calorimeter Instrument for measuring the differential energy supplied between a sample and reference to maintain a minimal temperature difference between the sample and reference in response to a temperature programme. 

Calorimetry is the basic experimental method employed in thennochemistry and thennal physics which enables the measurement of the difference in the energy U or enthalpy //of a system as a result of some process being done on the system. The instrument that is used to measure this energy or enthalpy difference (At/ or AH) is called a calorimeter. In the first section the relationships between the thennodynamic fiinctions and calorunetry are established. The second section gives a general classification of calorimeters in tenns of the principle of operation. The third section describes selected calorimeters used to measure thennodynamic properties such as heat capacity, enthalpies of phase change, reaction, solution and adsorption. 

Dieterici s number is much higher than the others, which are in good agreement this experimenter used the Bunsen ice calorimeter, which is a very uncertain instrument. His results are, however, included in the mean adopted below. 

Parr Calorimeter (Parr Bomb). A device invented by S.W. Parr in 1912, and improved since then by the Parr Instrument Co of Moline, Illinois. 

Accelerating rate calorimeters (ARC) are customarily used to determine the overall reactivity of compounds. One limitation of these instruments is that pressure data at pre-exotherm temperatures are not recorded. However, such information may be important for the analysis of reactive systems in which pressure events are observed prior to the exotherm. An ARC has been modified so that pressure data can be acquired and stored for kinetic analysis by interfacing with a personal computer. Results are presented using this technique for the study of the decomposition chemistry of 4,4 -diisocyanatodiphenylmethane (MDI). 

A commercial instrument for constant-volume calorimetiy is called a bomb calorimeter, because the container in which the reaction occurs resembles a bomb. 

Instrumentation. H and NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker AV 400 spectrometer (400.2 MHz for proton and 100.6 MHz for carbon) at 310 K. Chemical shifts (< are expressed in ppm coupling constants (J) in Hz. Deuterated DMSO and/or water were used as solvent chemical shift values are reported relative to residual signals (DMSO 5 = 2.50 for H and 5 = 39.5 for C). ESl-MS data were obtained on a VG Trio-2000 Fisons Instruments Mass Spectrometer with VG MassLynx software. Vers. 2.00 in CH3CN/H2O at 60°C. Isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) experiments were conducted on a VP isothermal titration calorimeter from Microcal at 30°C. 

Anonymous. Software for Oscillating Differential Scanning Calorimeter. Horsham, Seiko Instruments 1995. 

The intrinsic sensitivity of a heat-flow calorimeter is defined as the value of the steady emf that is produced by the thermoelectric elements when a unit of thermal power is dissipated continuously in the active cell of the calorimeter 38). In the case of microcalorimeters, it is conveniently expressed in microvolts per milliwatt (juV/mW). This ratio, which is characteristic of the calorimeter itself, is particularly useful for comparison purposes. Typical values for the intrinsic sensitivity of the microcalorimeters that have been described in this section are collected in Table I, together with the temperature ranges in which these instruments may be utilized. The intrinsic sensitivity has, however, very little practical importance, since it yields no indication of the maximum amplification that may be applied to the emf generated by the thermoelements without developing excessive noise in the indicating device. 

No theory can possibly take into account the arrangement of a real heat-flow calorimeter in all its details. Theoretical models of heat-flow calorimeters, which are necessarily simplified versions of the actual instruments, will therefore be used in the following calculations. It must be remarked that because of the limitations of the theory, no absolute measurements can be made with a heat-flow calorimeter, nor with any calorimeter. It is possible, however, to compare successive measurements with precision. A calorimetric study necessarily involves the calibration of the calorimeter and, upon this operation, depends the accuracy of the whole series of measurements. 

The differential equations Eqs. (10) and (29)3, which represent the heat transfer in a heat-flow calorimeter, indicate explicitly that the data obtained with calorimeters of this type are related to the kinetics of the thermal phenomenon under investigation. A thermogram is the representation, as a function of time, of the heat evolution in the calorimeter cell, but this representation is distorted by the thermal inertia of the calorimeter (48). It could be concluded from this observation that in order to improve heat-flow calorimeters, one should construct instruments, with a small... 

Although most heat-flow calorimeters are multipurpose instruments, it is clear that for each particular type of experiment, the inner calorimeter cell must be especially designed and carefully tested. The reliability of the calorimetric data and, thence, the precision of the results depend, to a large extent, upon the arrangement of the inner cell. Typical arrangements for adsorption studies are described in the next section (Section VI.A). 

The development of the theory of heat-flow calorimetry (Section VI) has demonstrated that the response of a calorimeter of this type is, because of the thermal inertia of the instrument, a distorted representation of the time-dependence of the evolution of heat produced, in the calorimeter cell, by the phenomenon under investigation. This is evidently the basic feature of heat-flow calorimetry. It is therefore particularly important to profit from this characteristic and to correct the calorimetric data in order to gain information on the thermokinetics of the process taking place in a heat-flow calorimeter. 

Safety studies of the graphite anode samples were performed using a Perkin-Elmer Differential Scanning Calorimeter (DSC, model Pyris 1) instrument. The temperature scanning rate was 10 C/min over a temperature range of 50 to 375°C. 

Rate of heat release measurements have been attempted since the late 1950 s. A prominent example of instrument design for the direct measurement of the sensible enthalpy of combustion products is the Ohio State University (OSU) calorimeter. This has been standardized by ASTM and a test method employing this technique (ASTM-E-906) is part of a FAA specification for evaluation of large interior surface materials. 

In summary, thus, if RHR calorimeters are fitted with the appropriate instrumentation they can be used to measure ... 

Heat release equipment can be used to measure various parameters on the same instrument, in a manner generally relevant to real fires. The two most frequently rate of heat release (RHR) calorimeters used are the Ohio State University (OSU calorimeter) [4] and the NBS cone (Cone calorimeter)[5]. 

The Cone RHR calorimeter [5] is a more modern instrument, designed to meet the same objectives as the OSU calorimeter. It is now being considered for standardization by ASTM [8] and by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO). It is a very versatile instrument, which allows simultaneous determinations to be made of release of heat, smoke and other combustion products, and of sample mass loss and soot mass formation. The Cone RHR calorimeter can, thus, measure the same properties as the OSU RHR calorimeter, plus a number of other ones based on sample and soot mass. 

The horizontal exposure method is not very adequate for the OSU RHR calorimeter, because the heat reflected from the aluminum foil onto the sample is much lower than the heat generated by the glow bars. Since the OSU calorimeter is based on the adiabaticity of the measurements, any heat losses will represent inaccurate results. The reflection on the aluminum foil is also uneven. Moreover, the use of higher radiant energy causes problems with the mechanical functioning of the instrument (bending and buckling of the back plate). 

Results from the NBS Cone Calorimeter have been shown to correlate with those from real fires. Moreover, it measures properties very relevant to fire hazard, in particular heat release, the most important of them. The OSU Calorimeter will measure many of the same properties. Furthermore, the results generated by both instruments have similar significance because of the good correlation between them. Smoke measurements are only relevant to fire... 

Adiabatic calorimeters are complex home-made instruments, and the measurements are time-consuming. Less accurate but easy to use commercial differential scanning calorimeters (DSCs) [18, 19] are a frequently used alternative. The method involves measurement of the temperature of both a sample and a reference sample and the differential emphasizes the difference between the sample and the reference. The two main types of DSC are heat flux and power-compensated instruments. In a heat flux DSC, as in the older differential thermal analyzers (DTA), the... 

---