Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Butyl methacrylate properties

To study the bulk copolymerization of styrene n-butyl methacrylate both conventional and unconventional GPC analyses were used. The normally obtained chromatograms, (from dual U.V. detectors) primarily provided area ratios intficative of composition as a function of retention volume. However, even this information was only obtainable after average compositions had been otherwise determined. Furthermore, in general, since the GPC normally separates on the basis of hydrodynamic volume, the polydispersity of aU polymer molecular properties at e h retention time is of serious concern. [Pg.179]

Poly(butyleneterephthalate) (PBT), 20 31. See also PBT entries Poly(l,4-butyleneterephthalate) (PBT) chemical properties of, 20 65 crystal parameters for, 20 64t economic aspects of, 20 67-68 flame retardant, 20 64-65 mechanical properties of, 20 65-66 physical properties of, 20 64-65 principal world manufacturers of, 20 67t uses for, 20 63-64 Poly(butyl methacrylate)-5/oc -... [Pg.725]

The poly(vinylpyridine) and poly(tert-butyl methacrylate) copolymers can easily be converted to either cationic or anionic polyelectrolytes by protonation of the pyridine rings or by base hydrolysis of the tert-butyl ester units, respectively. The highly branched structure of the molecules, in combination with the polyelectrolyte effect, should confer useful properties to these materials in solution for applications such as pH-sensitive reversible gels. [Pg.224]

The main feature of (meth)acrylate-based support materials is the broad diversity of monomers that is commercially available and that can thus can be used for the fabrication of monoliths. The resulting (meth)acrylate monoliths consequently cover a wide spectrum of surface chemistries and properties. The scope of monomers includes hydrophobic, hydrophilic, ionizable, chiral, as well as reactive (meth)acrylate building blocks [53]—the most popular being mixtures of butyl methacrylate and ethylene dimethacrylate (BMA/EDMA) or glycidyl methacrylate and ethylene dimethacrylate (GMA/EDMA) as cross-linker. [Pg.7]

Figure 2 Property distributions in a linear copolymer composition distribution, molecular weight distribution and sequence length distribution of poly styrene-co-n-butyl methacrylate). (Styrene units are represented by "A and n-butyl methacrylate units by B".)... Figure 2 Property distributions in a linear copolymer composition distribution, molecular weight distribution and sequence length distribution of poly styrene-co-n-butyl methacrylate). (Styrene units are represented by "A and n-butyl methacrylate units by B".)...
Rubber-toughened polystyrene composites were obtained similarly by polymerising the dispersed phase of a styrene/SBS solution o/w HIPE [171], or a styrene/MMA/(SBS or butyl methacrylate) o/w HIPE [172], The latter materials were found to be tougher, however, all polymer composites had mechanical properties comparable to bulk materials. Other rubber composite materials have been prepared from PVC and poly(butyl methacrylate) (PBMA) [173], via three routes a) blending partially polymerised o/w HIPEs of vi-nylidene chloride (VDC) and BMA, followed by complete polymerisation b) employing a solution of PBMA in VDC as the dispersed phase, with subsequent polymerisation and c) blending partially polymerised VDC HIPE with BMA monomer, then polymerisation. All materials obtained possessed mixtures of both homopolymers plus some copolymer, and had better mechanical properties than the linear copolymers. The third method was found to produce the best material. [Pg.205]

The supramolecular structure of block co-polymers allows the design of useful materials properties such as polarity leading to potential applications as second-order nonlinear optical materials, as well as piezo-, pyro-, and ferroelectricity. It is possible to prepare polar superlattices by mixing (blending) a 1 1 ratio of a polystyrene)-6-poly(butadiene)-6-poly-(tert-butyl methacrylate) triblock copolymer (SBT) and a poly (styrene)-Apoly (tert-butyl methacrylate) diblock copolymer (st). The result is a polar, lamellar material with a domain spacing of about 60 nm, Figure 14.10. [Pg.906]

Fig. 6.25. Effect of the percentage of 1-propanol in the porogenic mixture on the porous properties of monolithic polymers (Reprinted with permission from [64], Copyright 1998 American Chemical Society). Reaction conditions polymerization mixture ethylene dimethacrylate 16.00 wt.%, butyl methacrylate 23.88 wt.%, 2-acrylamido-2-methyl-l-propanesulfonic acid 0.12 wt.%, ternary porogen solvent 60.00 wt.% (consisting of 10 wt.% water and 90 wt.% of mixtures of 1-propanol and 1,4-butanediol), azobisisobutyronitrile 1 wt.% (with respect to monomers), polymerization time 20 h at 60°C. Fig. 6.25. Effect of the percentage of 1-propanol in the porogenic mixture on the porous properties of monolithic polymers (Reprinted with permission from [64], Copyright 1998 American Chemical Society). Reaction conditions polymerization mixture ethylene dimethacrylate 16.00 wt.%, butyl methacrylate 23.88 wt.%, 2-acrylamido-2-methyl-l-propanesulfonic acid 0.12 wt.%, ternary porogen solvent 60.00 wt.% (consisting of 10 wt.% water and 90 wt.% of mixtures of 1-propanol and 1,4-butanediol), azobisisobutyronitrile 1 wt.% (with respect to monomers), polymerization time 20 h at 60°C.
The scope of ion-selective electrodes (ISEs) has been greatly enhanced by employing a poly(vinyl chloride) matrix to entangle sensor cocktail materials. Fbr ISFET devices an in situ photopolymerisation of monobutyl methacrylate provides a viable poly(butyl methacrylate) calcium sensor film with good gate adhesion properties. One or more enzymes can be chemically immobilized on modified nylon mesh. The resultant matrices are suitable for the amperometric assay of carbohydrates in blood and food products. [Pg.105]

IPNs are also attractive for development of materials with enhanced mechanical properties. As PDMS acts as an elastomer, it is of interest to have a thermoplastic second network such as PMMA or polystyrene. Crosslinked PDMS have poor mechanical properties and need to be reinforced with silica. In the IPNs field, they can advantageously be replaced by a second thermoplastic network. On the other hand, if the thermoplastic network is the major component, the PDMS network can confer a partially elastomeric character to the resulting material. Huang et al. [92] studied some sequential IPNs of PDMS and polymethacrylate and varied the ester functionalities the polysiloxane network was swollen with MMA (methyl methacrylate), EMA (ethyl methacrylate) or BuMA (butyl methacrylate). Using DMA the authors determined that the more sterically hindered the substituent, the broader the damping zone of the IPN (Table 2). This damping zone broadness was also found to be dependant on the PDMS content, and atomic force microscopy (AFM) was used to observe the co-continuity of the IPN. [Pg.132]

Watanabe62) studied systematically the copolymerization of ra-methacryloyl-polyoxyethylenes, with monomers such as acrylonitrile, styrene, butyl methacrylate, and methacrylic acid. It should be mentioned that the macromonomers that he prepared are very short so that no difficulties were encountered to isolate the graft copolymers formed. There are many applications for these graft copolymers, e.g. as additives in polyacrylonitrile films and fibers they cause improved antistatic properties. They have been tested as varnishes, coatings, and wood dimensional stabilization agents. [Pg.43]

C 8 — and R. A. Guzzi Poly-n-butyl-methacrylate. III. Dilute solution properties by viscosity and light scattering. J. Polymer Sci. 21, 417 (1956). [Pg.98]

Schneider HA, Cantow HJ, Massen U et al. (1982) Donor-acceptor complexation in macro-molecular systems. 2. Synthesis and viscoelastic properties of donor-acceptor complexed poly(methyl methacrylate)s and poly(butyl methacrylate)s. Polym. BuU. (BerUn, Germany) 7 263-270. [Pg.97]

In SIN formation, both timing and rates of polymerization to form the two networks are important. With an acrylate-epoxy system, it was found that simultaneous gelation produced materials with poorer properties than those formed by slightly mismatched polymerization rates (6). In another instance (7), polyurethane-poly(n-butyl methacrylate) SINs in which the acrylate was initiated photolytically at various times after the onset of polyurethane formation produced a series of materials, presumably with the same chemical composition, with an average particle size that decreased as the delay time to acrylic initiation increased. Damping properties of these materials changed systematically across the series. [Pg.362]

The adhesion and wettability of thin films of poly(n-butyl methacrylate)(PBMA) and (butyl methacrylate/co-acrylic acid)(AA/BMA) cast from various solvents was studied. Most PBMA films showed adhesive failure regardless of the solvent from which they were cast. The AA/BMA films showed better adhesive properties when cast from the hydrogen-bonding solvents t-butanol and p-dioxane. [Pg.141]

Dynamic Mechanical Properties of Poly-n-Butyl Methacrylate. J. CoUoid Sci. 12, 327-341 (1957). [Pg.109]

A polyurethane (PU)/poly(n-butyl methacrylate) (PBMA) system has been selected for an investigation of the process of phase separation in immiscible polymer mixtures. Within this system, studies are made of the XX, lx, xl, and the 11 forms. In recognition of the incompatibility of PBMA with even the oligomeric soft segment precursor of the PU, no attempt was made to equalize the rates of formation of the component linear and network polymers. Rather, a slow PU formation process is conducted at room temperature in the presence of the PBMA precursors. At suitable times, a relatively rapid photopolymerization of the PBMA precursors is carried out in the medium of the slowly polymerizing PU. The expected result is a series of polymer mixtures essentially identical in component composition and differing experimentally only in the time between the onset of PU formation and the photoinitiation of the acrylic. This report focuses on the dynamic mechanical properties cf these materials and the morphologies seen by electron microscopy. [Pg.247]


See other pages where Butyl methacrylate properties is mentioned: [Pg.143]    [Pg.269]    [Pg.488]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.480]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.213]    [Pg.192]    [Pg.335]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.194]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.349]    [Pg.401]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.374]    [Pg.345]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.245]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.239 ]




SEARCH



Butyl 2-Methacrylate

Butyl methacrylate physical properties

Butyl methacrylates

Butylate properties

© 2024 chempedia.info