Adhesive Bonding Process

Free mono- and multilayer films may be adhesive- or extmsion-bonded in the laminating process. The bonding adhesive may be water- or solvent-based. Alternatively, a temperature-dependent polymer-based adhesive without solvent may be heated and set by cooling. In extmsion lamination, a film of a thermoplastic such as polyethylene is extmded as a bond between the two flat materials, which are brought together between a chilled and backup roU. 

Bonding Elastomers A Review of Adhesives Processes, G. Polaski, J. Means, B. Stull, R Warren, K. Allen, D. Mowrey and B. Carney. 

As stated above, the adhesion process begins with a chemical (not necessarily covalent) bonding followed by the adjustment of the cell shape to the substrate, hi the design of an ideal scaffold, therefore, the two aspects that must be considered are the chemistry of the attachment and the conformation of the scaffold. 

With time (under increased temperature and humidity) the crack tip continues to a weaker region which for this surface treatment appears to be near the oxide/alloy interface. Figure 11 summarizes the analysis of the bond failure for this particular surface treatment. The important aspect here is that under identical conditions, different surface preparations show different modes of failure. Weak boundary layers are not developed using some treatment/bonding combinations. Processes have been developed in which the locus of failure remains in the adhesive ("a cohesive failure") and it is necessary to use a mechanical test in which even more stress is placed on the interfacial region (19). 

Fig. 11. Scanning electron micrographs (a-d) shown sequential stages in the early part of the adhesion process for mouse fibroblasts from initial contact with a surface to the assumption of a more or less final morphology. The cytoskeleton has the ability to change cell shape quickly and an individual cell may pass from the initial spherical form to the final flattened one in a few minutes. The initial adhesion process at the points of contact between cell and surface is also very rapid but there are subsequent changes at the adhesion sites affecting the nature and strength of the bonds which may continue for many hours. These can be studied by TIRF microscopy...

Bonding operations frequently require the mechanical or chemical removal of loose oxide layers from iron and steel surfaces before adhesives are applied. To guard against slow reaction with environmental moisture after the bond has formed, iron and steel surfaces are often phosphated prior to bonding. This process converts the relatively reactive iron atoms to a more passive, chemically stable form that is coated with zinc or iron phosphate crystals. Such coatings are applied in an effort to convert a reactive and largely unknown surface to a relatively inert one whose structure and properties are reasonably well understood. 

The plastic surface, at the time of bonding, may be well suited to the adhesive process. However, after aging, undesirable surface conditions may present themselves at the interface, displace the adhesive, and result in bond failure. These weak boundary layers could come from the environment or from within the plastic substrate itself. Plasticizer migration and degradation of the interface through uv radiation are common examples of weak boundary layers that can develop with time at the interface. 

Another approach to 3D integration is to use wafer bonding to stack die before singulation this approach is referred to as wafer-level 3D. There have been a variety of approaches to wafer-level 3D that have been demonstrated, which can be categorized by the wafer-bonding approach used oxide-to-oxide, copper-to-copper, polymer-to-polymer (or adhesive bonding), and mixtures of these approaches (such as redistribution layer bonding). Each of these four approaches will be introduced in this section, with emphasis placed on their application to 3D. The bond unit processes are described further in Section 15.4.2, and their associated CMP issues are discussed in detail in Section 15.5. 

Thus, it appears that chemical reactivity or ionic-cross interactions could lead to in situ compatibilising or miscibility enhancement during melt-mixing. However, several questions remain. How does the reactivity modify the thermodynamic balance, the reciprocal miscibility or the rheological behaviour of the melt Or, how the covalent or ionic bonding influence the interfacial adhesion processability and final mechanical properties of the immiscible blends ... 

When pure solvents are used, the adhesive process involves the rapid dissolution or partial dissolution of layers close to the surface, which are then mixed when the parts are joined by means of light pressiffe. In the segments of the bonding joint in solution the levels of molecular mobility in the polymers are raised, and this circumstance already makes an improved intermolecular mixture possible. 

There are also polymers that can be brought to melting by heat supply. They are applied to the adherends in molten and solvent-free form. When the adhesive melt has cooled down, a bonded joint develops. Such adhesives, processed by melting and cooling down, are called hot-melt adhesives (Section 5.1). 

In the following, we therefore attempt to provide both fields of application with suitable information, since successful and precise bonding is the aim of all users. In addition, adhesive manufacturers have a comprehensive range of information material on adhesive selection and adhesive processing for the products they offer. 

Mixed fracture Failure of a bonded joint by proportionate forms of adhesion and cohesion fracture, usually caused by improper adhesive processing and surface pretreatment. 

Etching - In adhesive and solvent bonding, a process used to prepare plastic surfaces for bonding. Exposure of the plastic parts to a reactive chemical, such as chromic acid, or to an electrical discharge results in oxidation of the surface and an increase in surface roughness by removal of surface material. 

Contact-bond adhesives are applied to both of the surfaces to be bonded, allowed to dry until approximately nontacky to the touch, and then pressed together to form a bond. The elastomers in these adhesives have the property known as autohesion. This means that when the dried adhesive-coated surfaces are brought together under some pressure, the films join by a process of molecular difiusion and form a completed bond. 

Wood adhesives date back several millennia, and research on wood-adhesive interactions has been ongoing for over 75 years [1]. The past century has seen tremendous advances in adhesive chemistry, comprehension of the adhesion process, and knowledge on aspects that lead to failure in durability testing. For many applications, the critical aspects of bond formation that lead to durability have been well defined. However, the critical chemical and physical properties that lead to durable bonds have not been as well defined for wood adhesives as they have for metal and plastic adhesives. This discussion is not intended to ignore the excellent work that has been done in this field but rather to define where more work needs to be done. 

Dembo et al. [1988] developed a model based on the ideas of Evans [1985] and Bell [1978]. In this model, a piece of membrane is attached to the wall, and a pulling force is exerted on one end while the other end is held fixed. The cell membrane is modeled as a thin inextensible membrane. The model of Dembo et al. [1988] was subsequentlyextended via a probabilistic approach for the formation of bonds by Coezens-Roberts et al. [1990]. Other authors used the probabilistic approach and Monte Carlo simulation to study the adhesion process as reviewed by Zhu [ 2000]. Dembo s model has also been extended to account for the distribution of microvilli on the surface of the cell and to simulate the rolling and the adhesion of a cell on a surface under shear flow. Hammer and Apte [1992] modeled the cell as a microvilli-coated hard sphere covered with adhesive springs. The binding and breakage of bonds and the distribution of the receptors on the tips of the microvilli are computed using a probabilistic approach. 

---