Impact-resistant polymer blends

New Transparent Impact-Resistant Polymer Blends from Resins and Rubbers Having Minimized Compositional Heterogeneities... 

Toughened polypropylene may be prepared by block copolymerization in which ethylene monomer is added during the final stages of the polymerization of propylene (4). Thus, some polypropylene chains would contain an end block of rubbery ethylene-propylene copolymer. Alternatively, a blend of an elastomeric copolymer of ethylene and propylene (EPR or EPDM) with isotactic polypropylene (PP) can produce an impact-resistant polymer (5). 

Study of impact-resistant polymer blends has elucidated the fundamental role of block and graft copolymers (Cop) in a typical system like PS-PI-Cop (I, 2) and also in the case of two-phase materials formed by two resins... 

Toughness is probably the most examined property for polymer blends. Impact resistance depends... 

R. P. Fellmann, W. H. Stass, and D. R. Kory, Impact-Resistant Polymer Mass, Ger. Offen. 2,748,751 (1978). Interpenetrating networks with poly(Me methacrylate). Co-continuous interpenetrating networks of chains. Ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer/poly(Me methacrylate) blends. 

Phosphonium Salt—Urea Precondensate. A combination approach for producing flame-retardant cotton-synthetic blends has been developed based on the use of a phosphonium salt—urea precondensate (145). The precondensate is appUed to the blend fabric from aqueous solution. The fabric is dried, cured with ammonia gas, and then oxidized. This forms a flame-resistant polymer on and in the cotton fibers of the component. The synthetic component is then treated with either a cycUc phosphonate ester such as Antiblaze 19/ 19T, or hexabromocyclododecane. The result is a blended textile with good flame resistance. Another patent has appeared in which various modifications of the original process have been claimed (146). Although a few finishers have begun to use this process on blended textiles, it is too early to judge its impact on the industry. 

Automotive appHcations account for about 116,000 t of woddwide consumption aimuaHy, with appHcations for various components including headlamp assembHes, interior instmment panels, bumpers, etc. Many automotive appHcations use blends of polycarbonate with acrylonitrile—butadiene—styrene (ABS) or with poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT) (see Acrylonitrile polymers). Both large and smaH appHances also account for large markets for polycarbonate. Consumption is about 54,000 t aimuaHy. Polycarbonate is attractive to use in light appHances, including houseware items and power tools, because of its heat resistance and good electrical properties, combined with superior impact resistance. 

Polycarbonates based on tetramethylbisphenol A are thermally stable and have a high Vicat softening point of 196°C. On the other hand they have lower impact and notched impact resistance than the normal polymer. Blends with styrene-based polymers were introduced in 1980, and compared with PC/ABS blends, are claimed to have improved hydrolytic resistance, lower density and higher heat deflection temperatures. Suggested applications are as dishes for microwave ovens and car headlamp reflectors. 

In the preceding sections, our discussion has been limited to softer grade elastomer-plastic vulcanizates. Commercial interest, however, also centers on another major family of polymer blends, semi-rigid impact resistant polyolefins. Thus, we report some of our findings on PRP triblock copolymer and EVA rubber blends without... 

Impact strength (impact resistance), 10 177 of polycarbonates, 19 810-811 of styrene-based plastics, 23 362-363 Impact testing, 19 580 Impact tests, for polymer blends, 20 352... 

The heat distortion temperature of impact-resistant polystyrene may also be improved by polymer blends. Those of impact-resistant polystyrene with poly-2,5-dimethylphenylene-1,4-oxide (PPO) are particularly interesting (90). Polystyrene and PPO are molecularly compatible and mixtures of them have glass transition temperatures which vary virtually linearly with composition. A further advantage of these compositions which should not be under-estimated is their better flame resistance. 

PET can be blended with PBT or polycarbonate (PC) to make blends or alloys. Polycarbonate is a high Tg (150 °C) ductile, high-impact-strength polymer but has rather poor solvent resistance because of its amorphous nature. PET/PC blends have therefore proved advantageous because they combine the solvent-resistance... 

Most polystyrene products are not homopolystyrene since the latter is relatively brittle with low impact and solvent resistance (Secs. 3-14b, 6-la). Various combinations of copolymerization and blending are used to improve the properties of polystyrene [Moore, 1989]. Copolymerization of styrene with 1,3-butadiene imparts sufficient flexibility to yield elastomeric products [styrene-1,3-butadiene rubbers (SBR)]. Most SBR rubbers (trade names Buna, GR-S, Philprene) are about 25% styrene-75% 1,3-butadiene copolymer produced by emulsion polymerization some are produced by anionic polymerization. About 2 billion pounds per year are produced in the United States. SBR is similar to natural rubber in tensile strength, has somewhat better ozone resistance and weatherability but has poorer resilience and greater heat buildup. SBR can be blended with oil (referred to as oil-extended SBR) to lower raw material costs without excessive loss of physical properties. SBR is also blended with other polymers to combine properties. The major use for SBR is in tires. Other uses include belting, hose, molded and extruded goods, flooring, shoe soles, coated fabrics, and electrical insulation. 

High-impact polystyrene (HIPS) is produced by polymerizing styrene in the presence of a rubber, usually poly(l,3-butadiene). HIPS has improved impact resistance compared to polystyrene and competes with ABS products at low-cost end applications such as fast-food cups, lids, takeout containers, toys, kitchen appliances, and personal-care product containers. HIPS as well as ABS and SMA are used in physical blends with other polymers, such as polycarbonates, polyesters, and polyamides, to improve impact resistance (Sec. 2-13c-3). 

Several flexible polymers, such as natural rubber (NR) synthetic rubber (SR) polyalkyl acrylates copolymers of acrylonitrile, butadiene, and styrene, (ABS) and polyvinyl alkyl ethers, have been used to improve the impact resistance of PS and PVC. PS and copolymers of ethylene and propylene have been used to increase the ductility of polyphenylene oxide (PPO) and nylon 66, respectively. The mechanical properties of several other engineering plastics have been improved by blending them with thermoplastics. 

The polymers described above have been chemically pure, although physically helerodisperse. It is oflen possible lo combine two or more of these monomers in the same molecule to form a copolymer. This process produces still further modification of molecular properties and, in turn, modification of the physical properties of file product. Many commercial polymers are copolymers because of the blending of properties achieved in this way. For example, one of the important new polymers of the past ten years has been the family of copolymers of acrylonitrile, butadiene and styrene, commonly called ABS resins. The production of these materials has grown rapidly in a short period of time because of their combination of dimensional stability and high impact resistance. These properties are related to the impact resistance of acrylonitrile-butadiene rubber and the dimensional stability of polystyrene, which are joined in the same molecule. 

Where the two phases are completely compatible, a homogeneous polyblend results which behaves like a plasticized resin (one phase). If two polymers are compatible, the mixture is transparent rather than opaque. If the two phases are incompatible, the product is usually opaque and rather friable. When the two phases are partially compatibilized at their interfaces, the polyblend system may then assume a hard, impact-resistant character. However, incompatible or partially compatible mixtures may be transparent if the individual components are transparent and if both components have nearly the same refractive indices. Furthermore, if the particle size of the dispersed phase is much less than the wavelength of visible light (requiring a particle size of 0.1/a or less), the blends may be transparent. 

The properties of immiscible polymers blends are strongly dependent on the morphology of the blend, with optimal mechanical properties only being obtained at a critical particle size for the dispersed phase. As the size of the dispersed phase is directly proportional to the interfacial tension between the components of the blend, there is much interest in interfacial tension modification. Copolymers, either preformed or formed in situ, can localize at the interface and effectively modify the interfacial tension of polymer blends. The incorporation of PDMS phases is desirable as a method to improve properties such as impact resistance, toughness, tensile strength, elongation at break, thermal stability and lubrication. 

Despite the incompatibility of silicone towards many polymers, several techniques have been more or less successfully developed to produce silicone containing physical blends. Although compatibilization remains essentially of academic interest only, many industrial applications for IPNs are a testimony to their growing importance. Silicone blends allow researchers to introduce specific properties such as impact resistance or low surface energy to polymers that fundamentally lack these characteristics. On the other hand, it must be acknowledged that silicone blends and related fields of research are still open to further development and will undoubtedly lead to a wide range of future industrial applications. 

---