Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Binding constant, effective

This section aims to show how the LFER approach compares to other property calculation methods. Biological, chemical, and physical responses originate from interactions between two or more molecules. Many of these interactions can be looked at as involving a solute molecule surrounded by solvent molecules. The successful application of solute-solvent interaction models to many such properties has been well documented. Examples of these properties include solubility, partition coefficients, rate constants, and biological activities, such as equilibrium binding constants, effective doses, and toxicities, as well as other topics of interest in medicinal chemistry. [Pg.214]

The mechanism of interaction with DNA is suggested. Ethidium bromide (EB) displacement assay was performed. We determine the binding constant of Tb-E to DNA to be in the order of Ig K = 6.47 0.4. The bathochromic and hypsochromic effects in the absorption spectra of investigated complex were observed and the interaction is assumed to be mainly of the mono-intercalating type. [Pg.377]

It was noted early by Smid and his coworkers that open-chained polyethylene glycol type compounds bind alkali metals much as the crowns do, but with considerably lower binding constants. This suggested that such materials could be substituted for crown ethers in phase transfer catalytic reactions where a larger amount of the more economical material could effect the transformation just as effectively as more expensive cyclic ethers. Knbchel and coworkers demonstrated the application of open-chained crown ether equivalents in 1975 . Recently, a number of applications have been published in which simple polyethylene glycols are substituted for crowns . These include nucleophilic substitution reactions, as well as solubilization of arenediazonium cations . Glymes have also been bound into polymer backbones for use as catalysts " " . [Pg.312]

The apparent difference seems to be due to the difference in the binding constants of the complexes to micelles which is much larger in the lipophilic 38c than in the hydrophilic 38b complex27 . A somewhat different, but not an unusual micellar effect is observed in the case of the non-ionic surfactant Triton X-100 as shown in... [Pg.159]

Fig. 15-5 Comparative adsorption of several metals onto amorphous iron oxyhydroxide systems containing 10 M Fej and 0.1 m NaNOs. (a) Effect of solution pH on sorption of uncomplexed metals, (b) Comparison of binding constants for formation of soluble Me-OH complexes and formation of surface Me-O-Si complexes i.e. sorption onto Si02 particles, (c) Effect of solution pH on sorption of oxyanionic metals. (Figures (a), (c) reprinted with permission from Manzione, M. A. and Merrill, D. T. (1989). "Trace Metal Removal by Iron Coprecipitation Field Evaluation," EPRI report GS-6438, Electric Power Research Institute, California. Figure (b) reprinted with permission from Balistrieri, L. et al. (1981). Scavenging residence times of trace metals and surface chemistry of sinking particles in the deep ocean, Deep-Sea Res. 28A 101-121, Pergamon Press.)... Fig. 15-5 Comparative adsorption of several metals onto amorphous iron oxyhydroxide systems containing 10 M Fej and 0.1 m NaNOs. (a) Effect of solution pH on sorption of uncomplexed metals, (b) Comparison of binding constants for formation of soluble Me-OH complexes and formation of surface Me-O-Si complexes i.e. sorption onto Si02 particles, (c) Effect of solution pH on sorption of oxyanionic metals. (Figures (a), (c) reprinted with permission from Manzione, M. A. and Merrill, D. T. (1989). "Trace Metal Removal by Iron Coprecipitation Field Evaluation," EPRI report GS-6438, Electric Power Research Institute, California. Figure (b) reprinted with permission from Balistrieri, L. et al. (1981). Scavenging residence times of trace metals and surface chemistry of sinking particles in the deep ocean, Deep-Sea Res. 28A 101-121, Pergamon Press.)...
Figure 5 also shows the effect of the ionophore concentration of the Langmuir type binding isotherm. The slope of the isotherm fora membrane with 10 mM of ionophore 1 was roughly three times larger than that with 30 mM of the same ionophore. The binding constant, K, which is inversely proportional to the slope [Eq. (3)], was estimated to be 4.2 and 11.5M for the membranes with 10 mM and 30 mM ionophore 1, respectively. This result supports the validity of the present Langmuir analysis because the binding constant, K, should reflect the availability of the surface sites, the number of which should be proportional to the ionophore concentration, if the ionophore is not surface active itself In addition, the intercept of the isotherm for a membrane with 10 mM of ionophore 1 was nearly equal to that of a membrane with 30 mM ionophore 1 (see Fig. 5). This suggests the formation of a closest-packed surface molecular layer of the SHG active Li -ionophore 1 cation complex, whose surface concentration is nearly equal at both ionophore concentrations. On the other hand, a totally different intercept and very small slope of the isotherm was obtained for a membrane containing only 3 mM of ionophore 1. This indicates an incomplete formation of the closest-packed surface layer of the cation complexes due to a lack of free ionophores at the membrane surface, leading to a kinetic limitation. In this case, the potentiometric response of the membrane toward Li+ was also found to be very weak vide infra). Figure 5 also shows the effect of the ionophore concentration of the Langmuir type binding isotherm. The slope of the isotherm fora membrane with 10 mM of ionophore 1 was roughly three times larger than that with 30 mM of the same ionophore. The binding constant, K, which is inversely proportional to the slope [Eq. (3)], was estimated to be 4.2 and 11.5M for the membranes with 10 mM and 30 mM ionophore 1, respectively. This result supports the validity of the present Langmuir analysis because the binding constant, K, should reflect the availability of the surface sites, the number of which should be proportional to the ionophore concentration, if the ionophore is not surface active itself In addition, the intercept of the isotherm for a membrane with 10 mM of ionophore 1 was nearly equal to that of a membrane with 30 mM ionophore 1 (see Fig. 5). This suggests the formation of a closest-packed surface molecular layer of the SHG active Li -ionophore 1 cation complex, whose surface concentration is nearly equal at both ionophore concentrations. On the other hand, a totally different intercept and very small slope of the isotherm was obtained for a membrane containing only 3 mM of ionophore 1. This indicates an incomplete formation of the closest-packed surface layer of the cation complexes due to a lack of free ionophores at the membrane surface, leading to a kinetic limitation. In this case, the potentiometric response of the membrane toward Li+ was also found to be very weak vide infra).
Of the solid poisons we have used, Si02-SH and QTU seem to bind palladium more effectively than PVPy - that is, they have significantly different palladium binding constants. Furthermore, all the solids have different functional group loadings. Thus, determining how much of... [Pg.199]

The stability of a trivial assembly is simply determined by the thermodynamic properties of the discrete intermolecular binding interactions involved. Cooperative assembly processes involve an intramolecular cyclization, and this leads to an enhanced thermodynamic stability compared with the trivial analogs. The increase in stability is quantified by the parameter EM, the effective molarity of the intramolecular process, as first introduced in the study of intramolecular covalent cyclization reactions (6,7). EM is defined as the ratio of the binding constant of the intramolecular interaction to the binding constant of the corresponding intermolecular interaction (Scheme 2). The former can be determined by measuring the stability of the self-assembled structure, and the latter value is determined using simple monofunctional reference compounds. [Pg.215]

Figure 31 Scheme for the protein-binding, diffusional, and partitioning processes and barriers that are encountered by a highly lipophilic and membrane-interactive drug (D) as it permeates through a cell within a continuous monolayer, h and h, thicknesses of the aqueous boundary layers. kd and ka, dissociation and association binding constants, respectively. P, protein molecule. Permeability coefficients Effective, Pe aqueous boundary layer, PABL and PW apical membrane, Pap basolateral membrane, Pbl. [Pg.314]

Studies of the absorption spectra of the anti-tumour compounds and the spectra of their complexes with biological molecules will undoubtedly be the most convenient and effective way of examining the possible interactions, of measuring binding constants, and of determining rate constants for complexation. [Pg.26]

Figures 1 and 2 show the effect of temperature on the extent of binding of DDT to both Pakim Pond Humic Acid and Boonton Humic Acid. The Y axis in these figures is the amount of DDT bound to the humic acid in nanograms of DDT per gram of humic acid. The X axis is the free, truly dissolved DDT in nanograms per liter. This is similar to the presentation of an adsorption isotherm. If the slope of the lines is multiplied by 1000 it becomes analogous to a weight-weight partition coefficient ([g DDT/g D0C]/[g DDT/g water]). This will be referred to as the binding constant. Figures 1 and 2 show the effect of temperature on the extent of binding of DDT to both Pakim Pond Humic Acid and Boonton Humic Acid. The Y axis in these figures is the amount of DDT bound to the humic acid in nanograms of DDT per gram of humic acid. The X axis is the free, truly dissolved DDT in nanograms per liter. This is similar to the presentation of an adsorption isotherm. If the slope of the lines is multiplied by 1000 it becomes analogous to a weight-weight partition coefficient ([g DDT/g D0C]/[g DDT/g water]). This will be referred to as the binding constant.

See other pages where Binding constant, effective is mentioned: [Pg.2502]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.221]    [Pg.325]    [Pg.1483]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.474]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.345]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.218]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.410]    [Pg.484]    [Pg.486]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.251]    [Pg.463]    [Pg.482]    [Pg.53]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.281 ]




SEARCH



Binding constants solvation effects

Binding effect

© 2024 chempedia.info