Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Bayesian network theory

One challenge in applying this approach, which relies on prior estimates of method prediction reliability, is how to deal with differences between future compounds to be tested and the universe of all compounds on which the collected experience of R D process effectiveness has been based. If new active compounds fall within the space previously sampled, then knowledge of chemical properties is just another kind of conditioning within a Bayesian network if they fall outside this space, then the initial model of both outcomes and predictions has an unpredictable error. The use of sampling theory and models of diversity [16] are therefore promising extensions of the above approach. [Pg.271]

Buntine, W. (1991). Theory refinement on Bayesian networks. In Proceedings of Seventh Conference on Uncertainity in Artificial Intelligence. Los Angeles, CA Morgan Kaufmann, 52-60. [Pg.280]

Larik A, Haider S (2010) Efforts to blend ontology with Bayesian networks an overview. In Proceedings of 3rd international conference on advanced computer theory and engineering. Chendgu, China... [Pg.120]

ABSTRACT Dependencies or failure dependencies in probabilistic risk assessments may lead to significant errors if not properly analyzed. In order to overcome the limitations of tradition methods, a modified Bayesian Network (BN), which is called Evidential Network (EN), was proposed with evidence theory to handle dependencies in Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA). Fault Trees (IT s) and Event Trees (ETs) were transformed into an EN which constructs a uniform framework to represent accident scenarios. Dependencies can be processed through the corresponding evidential networks where uncertainties are characterized by basic belief mass. A case study was discussed to demonstrate the proposed approach. Frequencies of end states were obtained and expressed by belief and plausibility measures. The proposed approach can be easily applied to probabilistic risk assessments that involve dependencies while addresses the uncertainties in experts knowledge. [Pg.1421]

Simon, C., Weber, P. EvsukofF, A. 2008. Bayesian networks inference algorithm to implement Dempster Shafer theory in reliability analysis. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 93 950-963. [Pg.1429]

The problem in the analysis occurs when the database is incomplete or uncertain. There is a need to rely on the knowledge and the experience of experts. In the literature it can be found a new issue of so-called risk analysis in uncertainty conditions. There are two approaches related to this issue. The first approach assumes that the risk is a kind of uncertainty. Taking into account the uncertainty data in risk analysis it is possible to make an analyse using the theory of subjective probability and neural Bayesian networks (Dempster 1967, Hahnet al. 2002, Haimes... [Pg.1473]

In order to estimate the information quality of a selected system you should model the uncertainty the reverse of which could indicate IQ. Uncertainty can be modelled by using, among others, Bayesian networks. However, in this case, the data come from various sources and to simplify the modelling, and thereby calculation, could be used the theory mathematical evidence created by Dempster and Shafer. However, since we assess information from computer systems (modern detectors and... [Pg.1909]

Various advanced modeling approaches are available and have been applied, e.g.. Input-output Inoperability Modeling (IIM), Complex Network (CN) Theory, PetriNet (PN)-based modeling, Agent-Based Modeling (ABM), System Dynamic (SD), Bayesian Network (BN), Dynamic Control System Theory (DCST). [Pg.2061]

The analysis of Bayesian network is based on the specification of conditional probabilities of nodes under assumption of information on other nodes (in the direction of casual links). The analysis is based on the concept of conditional probabiUties and the theory of probabiUty. Detail information is provided e.g., by Hohcky (2009), Nielsen Jensen (2007) and Stewart Melchers (1997). [Pg.2237]

A common use of statistics in structural biology is as a tool for deriving predictive distributions of strucmral parameters based on sequence. The simplest of these are predictions of secondary structure and side-chain surface accessibility. Various algorithms that can learn from data and then make predictions have been used to predict secondary structure and surface accessibility, including ordinary statistics [79], infonnation theory [80], neural networks [81-86], and Bayesian methods [87-89]. A disadvantage of some neural network methods is that the parameters of the network sometimes have no physical meaning and are difficult to interpret. [Pg.338]

Graph theory Describes topology of networks and subnetworks, based on quantification of the number of nodes (signaling components) and links between them. Dynamic properties of networks through Boolean analysis. Network analysis based on probabilities (Markov chain and Bayesian) to identify paths and relationships between different nodes in the network. (75-81)... [Pg.2217]

Training a neural network model essentially means selecting one model from the set of allowed models (or, in a Bayesian framework, determining a distribution over the set of allowed models) that minimizes the cost criterion. There are numerous algorithms available for training neural network models most of them can be viewed as a straightforward application of optimization theory and statistical estimation. Recent developments in this field use particle swarm optimization and other swarm intelligence techniques. [Pg.917]

Droguett, E. L., Moura, M. C., Jacinto, C. M. Jr., M. F. S. 2008. A semi-Markov model with Bayesian belief network based human error probability for availability assessment of downhole optical monitoring systems. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 16(10) 1713-1727. [Pg.624]

The theory supporting Bayesian Belief networks rests on a rich tradition of probability theory, and statistical decision theory and it is supported by excellent axiomatic and behavioural arguments [Pearl, 1998]. A Bayesian belief network for a set of variables X = Xj, X2,. .., X consists of a) a directed network structure that encodes a set of conditional independence assertions about variables in X and b) a set P of local probability distributions associated with each variable, describing the distribution of the variable conditioned on its parent variables. The nodes in the network structure are in one-to-one correspondence with the variables in the probabilistic model. [Pg.245]

The two probabilistic theories that will be mentioned in this book are conditional probabihty and Bayesian Belief Networks (BBN). [Pg.50]


See other pages where Bayesian network theory is mentioned: [Pg.69]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.389]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.86]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.1478]    [Pg.2052]    [Pg.2060]    [Pg.396]    [Pg.468]    [Pg.477]    [Pg.918]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.318]    [Pg.88]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.27 ]




SEARCH



Bayesian

Bayesian networks

Bayesian theory

Bayesians

Network theory

© 2024 chempedia.info