Bayesian

Limited Projections and Views Bayesian 3D Reconstruction Using Gibbs Priors. 

This paper is structured as follows in section 2, we recall the statement of the forward problem. We remind the numerical model which relates the contrast function with the observed data. Then, we compare the measurements performed with the experimental probe with predictive data which come from the model. This comparison is used, firstly, to validate the forward problem. In section 4, the solution of the associated inverse problem is described through a Bayesian approach. We derive, in particular, an appropriate criteria which must be optimized in order to reconstruct simulated flaws. Some results of flaw reconstructions from simulated data are presented. These results confirm the capability of the inversion method. The section 5 ends with giving some tasks we have already thought of. 

O. Venard. Eddy current tomography a bayesian approach with a compound weak membrane-beta prior model. In Advances in Signal Processing for Non Destructive Evaluation of Materials, 1997. 

Probability in Bayesian inference is interpreted as the degree of belief in the truth of a statement. The belief must be predicated on whatever knowledge of the system we possess. That is, probability is always conditional, p(X l), where X is a hypothesis, a statement, the result of an experiment, etc., and I is any information we have on the system. Bayesian probability statements are constructed to be consistent with common sense. This can often be expressed in tenns of a fair bet. As an example, I might say that the probability that it will rain tomorrow is 75%. This can be expressed as a bet I will bet 3 that it will rain tomorrow, if you give me 4 if it does and nothing if it does not. (If I bet 3 on 4 such days, I have spent 12 I expect to win back 4 on 3 of those days, or 12). 

There are two central rules of probability theory on which Bayesian inference is based [30] ... 

For Bayesian inference, we are seeking the probability of a hypothesis H given the data D. This probability is denotedp(H D). It is very likely that we will want to compare different hypotheses, so we may want to compare p(Hi D) with p(H2 D). Because it is difficult to write down an expression forp(H D), we use Bayes rule to invert the probability of p(D H) to obtain an expression for p(H D) ... 

It should be noted that the Bayesian conception of probability of a hypothesis and the Bayesian procedure for assessing this probability is the original paradigm for probabilistic... 

Bayesian confidence intervals, by contrast, are defined as the interval in which. 

The frequentist interval is often interpreted as if it were the Bayesian interval, but it is fundamentally defined by the probability of the data values given the parameter and not the probability of the parameter given the data. 

The Bayesian View of Probability Corresponds to Most Scientists ... 

Another aspect in which Bayesian methods perform better than frequentist methods is in the treatment of nuisance parameters. Quite often there will be more than one parameter in the model but only one of the parameters is of interest. The other parameter is a nuisance parameter. If the parameter of interest is 6 and the nuisance parameter is ( ), then Bayesian inference on 6 alone can be achieved by integrating the posterior distribution over ( ). The marginal probability of 6 is therefore... 

In the next subsection, I describe how the basic elements of Bayesian analysis are formulated mathematically. I also describe the methods for deriving posterior distributions from the model, either in terms of conjugate prior likelihood forms or in terms of simulation using Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods. The utility of Bayesian methods has expanded greatly in recent years because of the development of MCMC methods and fast computers. I also describe the basics of hierarchical and mixture models. 

The complexity of infonnation that can be incorporated into the model gives Bayesian statistics much of its power. 

Mixmre models have come up frequently in Bayesian statistical analysis in molecular and structural biology [16,28] as described below, so a description is useful here. Mixture models can be used when simple forms such as the exponential or Dirichlet function alone do not describe the data well. This is usually the case for a multimodal data distribution (as might be evident from a histogram of the data), when clearly a single Gaussian function will not suffice. A mixture is a sum of simple forms for the likelihood ... 

Maximum likelihood methods used in classical statistics are not valid to estimate the 6 s or the q s. Bayesian methods have only become possible with the development of Gibbs sampling methods described above, because to form the likelihood for a full data set entails the product of many sums of the form of Eq. (24) ... 

There is some confusion in using Bayes rule on what are sometimes called explanatory variables. As an example, we can try to use Bayesian statistics to derive the probabilities of each secondary structure type for each amino acid type, that is p( x r), where J. is a, P, or Y (for coil) secondary strucmres and r is one of the 20 amino acids. It is tempting to writep( x r) = p(r x)p( x)lp(r) using Bayes rule. This expression is, of course, correct and can be used on PDB data to relate these probabilities. But this is not Bayesian statistics, which relate parameters that represent underlying properties with (limited) data that are manifestations of those parameters in some way. In this case, the parameters we are after are 0 i(r) = p( x r). The data from the PDB are in the form of counts for y i(r), the number of amino acids of type r in the PDB that have secondary structure J.. There are 60 such numbers (20 amino acid types X 3 secondary structure types). We then have for each amino acid type a Bayesian expression for the posterior distribution for the values of xiiry. 

The Bayesian alternative to fixed parameters is to define a probability distribution for the parameters and simulate the joint posterior distribution of the sequence alignment and the parameters with a suitable prior distribution. How can varying the similarity matrix... 

Zhu et al. [15] and Liu and Lawrence [61] formalized this argument with a Bayesian analysis. They are seeking a joint posterior probability for an alignment A, a choice of distance matrix 0, and a vector of gap parameters. A, given the data, i.e., the sequences to be aligned p(A, 0, A / i, R2). The Bayesian likelihood and prior for this posterior distribution is... 

---