Auditor outside

If the assessment does extend to such documents, and the auditors find nonconformities in the areas outside the scope of the standard, will they count ... 

As databases were automated that review function became increasingly problematic, and increasingly a concern of both outside FDA and internal QA auditors. As a response to the difficulty in tracking a data point change in an electronic file automated audit trails were developed, encouraged, and finally (in Part 11) required. 

Of course, the independent auditor will not preclude a regulatory visit by FDA investigators. But, the office investigation will likely be reduced to a review of and confirmation of the outside audit, if you supply the audit report and/or certifying letter at the time of the official visit if the investigator recognizes the credibility of the auditor and if the independence is recognized. 

The discipline of the regulated laboratory requires the equivalent of a notebook or log, physical or electronic that will record problems. The recording by itself, however, is not sufficient evidence of control. The tracking and resolution of these problems both demonstrate that active measures are being taken to control the system. These entries, linked to activities required to enhance or update the system, provide evidence that the required activities are actually being performed. In addition, they provide an outside auditor with another frame of reference for seeking and reviewing evidence of control. 

The most difficult part of the procedure of producing reliable analytical values will be obtaining a recognition by analysts of the necessity for quality control as an inherent accompaniment of analytical work. If analysts do not utilize this technique voluntarily, outside auditors will insist that such data accompany all regulatory submissions, as part of compliance with good laboratory practice regulations. 

It has already been pointed out that employees tend to soften bad news—they are worried about the shoot the messenger syndrome. But they are not the only ones facing this problem auditors and other outside reviewers face the same temptation to play down bad news. They do not want to hurt... 

It is difficult for any organization to truly assess the quality of its own culture ( Does a fish know that it s wet ). Everyone learns to live with situations that really need attention. It generally takes an outsider to tmly evaluate the quality of a company s culture, particularly the negative aspects. Therefore, an organization with a strong culture will make frequent use of outside auditors, inspectors, and reviewers to identify areas of weakness and to suggest corrective actions. (In large companies, the outsiders may come from corporate headquarters or from another division.)... 

A glossary is used to define technical terms and abbreviations it will not always be required. The glossary should not overlook simple terms. An experienced technician does not need to be told the difference between a compressor and a pump, but an outsider, such as an auditor might not know. 

An auditor must always be independent of the facility being reviewed and must always have complete freedom to observe and report on aU aspects of the operation covered by the auditor s Scope of Work. His or her outside perspective not only ensures that there is no conflict of interest it can also provide alternative points of view that can be helpful to the people working within the facility if he or she is asked to offer advice following the formal audit. 

Outside auditors generally come from one of the following foiu groups ... 

An outside auditor should not provide follow-up services to the audit. Such services represent a conflict of interest, with the exception of reviewer-type comments, as discussed above. 

Internal auditors do not see the facility with an outsider s eyes. Hence they may lack helicoptic vision, i.e., the ability to rise above the minutiae of a problem to see the surrounding countryside. In other words, they can t see the forest for the trees. 

Some interesting situations may arise. For example, something may be flagged as a significant safety concern by the auditors that the concessionaire considers outside the scope of the project. The project owner must then be engaged to decide how the safety issue will be resolved. 

There is overlap between the two approaches. For example, a company that uses self-regulation always faces the possibility of an external audit from a government agency. Also, its program will be scrutinized very carefully by outsiders if there is a serious accident. Also some companies use internal auditors that are supplied by corporate headquarters. They act in the same way as external auditors. 

Work with outside parties such as auditors from the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation, and Enforcement (BOEMRE). 

After inventory accuracy measures had been taken, internal and outside auditors had to decide if inventory accuracy was improved adequately to discontinue quarterly physical inventories. They decided that an annual physical inventory was sufficient. 

The strongest positive evidence for criterion-based validation comes from a study by Ray et al. (2000) of 25 manufacturing plants in Alabama. They developed an audit on the maintenance function of these plants. The audits were conducted by outside auditors from the University of Alabama. Audit scores were correlated with the recordable rate. Using a rank-order correlation, they found a statistically significant negative correlation between the audit scores and the incident rate, meaning that the better the audit score, the lower the incident rate. 

Good housekeeping is central to all types of operational, maintenance, and safety work. The quahty of housekeeping also provides auditors and other outsiders with an opportunity to provide a quick evaluation of the overall level of operational excellence in a facility. In the words of the proverb, You don t get a second chance to make a first impression. And it is housekeeping that creates that first impression. Housekeeping also provides a quick check regarding culture and employee participation since everyone has an impact on the appearance of the facility. 

Work with outside parties such as auditors from BOEMRE. 

The Transport Research Laboratory s (TRL) report Manual for Streets Evidence and Research (York et al, 2007) contains information on the effects of road and junction layouts on speed and road safety. However, the sites chosen for the study were aU in housing estates with average speeds under 25 mph and traffic flows up to about 1000 vehicles per day. Indeed, one site was eliminated from the study because it was significantly different from other sites, and the report states that The site had to be excluded from the analysis and therefore other exceptions could exist. Should a Road Safety Auditor rely on research in this report when looking at a design likely to be outside these speed and flow limits ... 

Road Safety Auditors may well be asked to carry out Road Safety Audits on schemes designed and implemented outside their own country. TMS Consultancy has carried out Road Safety Audits in several European countries, and is currently involved in Road Safety Audits in the Middle East. Not only do other countries have different design standards but there are often different road user characteristics, for example ... 

---