Crystal structure Atomic

For many studies of single-crystal surfaces, it is sufficient to consider the surface as consisting of a single domain of a unifonn, well ordered atomic structure based on a particular low-Miller-mdex orientation. However, real materials are not so flawless. It is therefore usefril to consider how real surfaces differ from the ideal case, so that the behaviour that is intrinsic to a single domain of the well ordered orientation can be distinguished from tliat caused by defects. 

Much surface work is concerned with the local atomic structure associated with a single domain. Some surfaces are essentially bulk-temiinated, i.e. the atomic positions are basically unchanged from those of the bulk as if the atomic bonds in the crystal were simply cut. More coimnon, however, are deviations from the bulk atomic structure. These structural adjustments can be classified as either relaxations or reconstructions. To illustrate the various classifications of surface structures, figure A1.7.3(a ) shows a side-view of a bulk-temiinated surface, figure A1.7.3(b) shows an oscillatory relaxation and figure A1.7.3(c) shows a reconstructed surface. 

Certain materials, most notably semiconductors, can be mechanically cleaved along a low-mdex crystal plane in situ in a UFIV chamber to produce an ordered surface without contamination. This is done using a sharp blade to slice tire sample along its preferred cleavage direction. For example. Si cleaves along the (111) plane, while III-V semiconductors cleave along the (110) plane. Note that the atomic structure of a cleaved surface is not necessarily the same as that of the same crystal face following treatment by IBA. 

The PDB contains 20 254 experimentally determined 3D structures (November, 2002) of macromolecules (nucleic adds, proteins, and viruses). In addition, it contains data on complexes of proteins with small-molecule ligands. Besides information on the structure, e.g., sequence details (primary and secondary structure information, etc.), atomic coordinates, crystallization conditions, structure factors. 

The classical approach for determining the structures of crystalline materials is through diflfiaction methods, i.e.. X-ray, neutron-beam, and electron-beam techniques. Difiiaction data can be analyzed to yield the spatial arrangement of all the atoms in the crystal lattice. EXAFS provides a different approach to the analysis of atomic structure, based not on the diffraction of X rays by an array of atoms but rather upon the absorption of X rays by individual atoms in such an array. Herein lie the capabilities and limitations of EXAFS. 

LEED is the most powerfiil, most widely used, and most developed technique for the investigation of periodic surface structures. It is a standard tool in the surface analysis of single-crystal surfaces. It is used very commonly as a method to check surface order. The evolution of the technique is toward greater use to investigate surface disorder. Progress in atomic-structure determination is focused on improving calculations for complex molecular surface structures. 

ReflEXAES can be used for near-surface structural analysis of a wide variety of samples for which no other technique is appropriate. As with EXAES, ReflEXAES is particularly suited for studying the local atomic structure around particular atomic species in non-crystalline environments. It is, however, also widely used for the analysis of nanocrystalline materials and for studying the initial stages of crystallization at surfaces or interfaces. ReflEXAES was first proposed by Barchewitz [4.135], and after several papers in the early nineteen-eighties [4.136, 4.168-4.170] it became an established (although rather exotic) characterization technique. Most synchrotron radiation sources now have beam-lines dedicated to ReflEXAES experiments. 

Very recently, people who engage in computer simulation of crystals that contain dislocations have begun attempts to bridge the continuum/atomistic divide, now that extremely powerful computers have become available. It is now possible to model a variety of aspects of dislocation mechanics in terms of the atomic structure of the lattice around dislocations, instead of simply treating them as lines with macroscopic properties (Schiotz et al. 1998, Gumbsch 1998). What this amounts to is linking computational methods across different length scales (Bulatov et al. 1996). We will return to this briefly in Chapter 12. 

To recapitulate, the legs of the imaginary tripod on which the structure of materials science is assembled are atoms and crystals phase equilibria microstructure. Of course, these are not wholly independent fields of study. Microstructure consists of phases geometrically disposed, phases are controlled by Gibbsian thermodynamics. 

Atomic number Atomic weight Crystal structure Melting Density Thermal Electrical resistivity (at 20°C) Temperature coefficient of resistivity Specific Thermal Standard electrode potential Thermal neutron absorption cross-section. 

The value of Emin in the pseudo-stable state has been found to increase in the sequence (111) (100)single-crystal faces in aqueous solutions. It has been concluded that the Au-DMSO interactions vary much more with the atomic structure of the gold surface than the Au-H20 interactions and that the Au-DMSO interactions are stronger than forH20.477 Following Trasatti s relation,7 the values of A(<5 m - have been obtained for different planes of Au. It has been found that the difference (<5/M - S/s) for Au( 110) and Au( 111) planes is greater than 0.5 V.477 It should be noted that the same order of Au( 111) and Au(210) has been found in a 2.5 x 10-3 M KPF6 + AN solution.63,392,477... 

Of the three principal classes of crystals, ionic crystals, crystals containing electron-pair bonds (covalent crystals), and metallic crystals, we feel that a good understanding of the first class has resulted from the work done in the last few years. Interionic distances can be reliably predicted with the aid of the tables of ionic radii obtained by Goldschmidt1) by the analysis of the empirical data and by Pauling2) by a treatment based on modem theories of atomic structure. The stability,... 

The interaction between particle and surface and the interaction among atoms in the particle are modeled by the Leimard-Jones potential [26]. The parameters of the Leimard-Jones potential are set as follows pp = 0.86 eV, o-pp =2.27 A, eps = 0.43 eV, o-ps=3.0 A. The Tersoff potential [27], a classical model capable of describing a wide range of silicon structure, is employed for the interaction between silicon atoms of the surface. The particle prepared by annealing simulation from 5,000 K to 50 K, is composed of 864 atoms with cohesive energy of 5.77 eV/atom and diameter of 24 A. The silicon surface consists of 45,760 silicon atoms. The crystal orientations of [ 100], [010], [001 ] are set asx,y,z coordinate axes, respectively. So there are 40 atom layers in the z direction with a thickness of 54.3 A. Before collision, the whole system undergoes a relaxation of 5,000 fsat300 K. 

The atomic structure of this subunit and its complexes with substrate analogs revealed the enzymatic activity of the rRNA backbone. Thus, the ribosome is in fact a ribozyme P Nissen, J Hansen, N Ban, PB Moore, TA Steitz. Science 289 920-930, 2000. Atomic structure of the ribosome s small 30S subunit, resolved at 5 A WM Clemons Jr, JL May, BT Wimberly, JP McCutcheon, MS Capel, V Ramakrishnan. Nature 400 833-840, 1999. The 8-A crystal structure of the 70S ribosome reveals a double-helical RNA bridge between the 50S and the 30S subunit GM Culver, JH Cate, GZ Yusupova, MM Yusupov, HF Noller. Science 285 2133-2136, 1999. 

Do not confuse crystal structure and crystal lattice. The crystal structure designates a regular array of atoms, the crystal lattice corresponds to an infinity of translation vectors (Section 2.2). The terms should not be mixed up either. There exists no lattice structure and no diamond lattice , but a diamond structure. 

It may be noted that the statement made above—that the surface potential in the electrolyte phase does not depend on the orientation of the crystal face—is necessarily an assumption, as is the neglect of S s1- It is another example of separation of metal and electrolyte contributions to a property of the interface, which can only be done theoretically. In fact, a recent article29 has discussed the influence of the atomic structure of the metal surface for solid metals on the water dipoles of the compact layer. Different crystal faces can allow different degrees of interpenetration of species of the electrolyte and the metal surface layer. Nonuniformities in the directions parallel to the surface may be reflected in the results of capacitance measurements, as well as optical measurements. 

---