Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Area between Particles and Surface

Contact of Ideally Smooth Surfaces. In order to determine the forces and energy of molecular interaction according to Eqs. (II.21)-(II.24) and (11.37)-(11.40), we need to know (in addition to the constants A and B) the value of H, i.e., the distance between the contiguous bodies. For absolutely smooth, nondeformable bodies, the value of H is the shortest distance between them. [Pg.46]

When two bodies come into contact, the contact zone may be deformed. Then the value of H will determine the gap between the bodies, and in this case a correction must be introduced into Eq. (11.24)  [Pg.46]

in order to determine the force of molecular interaction in accordance with Eq. (11.58), it is necessary to know the radius of the contact area of the adherent particle. [Pg.46]

In elastic contact, when a sphere with radius r is pressed against an ideally smooth substrate with a force the radius of the contact area can be calculated by the Hertz formula [7, p. 183]  [Pg.47]

In the contact of a microparticle with a plane surface, if the force Fp is equal to the force of adhesion, then, Eq. (11.59) can be used to determine the area of actual contact of a smooth particle with a smooth surface. Up to the present time, the area of actual contact between a particle and a surface has not been determined, and the use of the Hertz formula in calculating this area is only tentatively justified. The influence of the contact area on the force of adhesion can thus far be evaluated only indirectly. For example, the adhesion of gold spheres with a diameter of 6-7 /rm to a polyamide plate has been found to be greater than the adhesion to a gold plate or a smooth quartz plate (for detachment of 50% of the particles the respective forces required are 0.25, 0.09, and 0.05 dyn). This difference is explained by deformation of the area of contact with the polyamide plate since the deposition of dust on these surfaces was accompanied by additional pressing of the particles onto the surface as a result of the vibration [64]. [Pg.47]


Such a method has certain advantages. In the first place, it eliminates the inaccuracy involved in the indeterminacy of contact area (it should be noted that no determination has yet been made of the true contact area between particle and surface) and in the second place, it enables us to compare the adhesive force of a powder layer with the adhesive force of a monolayer, i.e., to compare the two cases of adhesion. [Pg.23]

As can be seen from these data, Eq. (11.66) is followed satisfactorily (the force of adhesion is directly proportional to the square of particle diameter), and all calculations involved in the determination of the actual contact area between particles and surface are valid. [Pg.49]

The increase in adhesive interaction with increasing contact time between particles and surface in air, by analogy with this sort of process in a liquid medium, is termed aging [89]. There may be several causes of aging an increase in contact area between particle and surface as a result of deformation or as a result of the influence of various contaminants adsorption processes and capillary condensation may take place in the contact zone, so that capillary forces are created. [Pg.121]

Scatter in adhesive forces may also be due to the indeterminacy of contact area between particles and surface this may in turn reflect the roughness of the contact surfaces and different relationships between the sizes of the adherent particles and the parameters characterizing the roughness of the solid surface (see Section 21). [Pg.127]

The greater importance of the electrical component for weakly adherent particles is explained on the basis that these particles are located on peaks of the rough surface. The contact area between particle and surface is at a minimum for such particles, and both the electrical and molecular forces of adhesion drop off the molecular forces, which are inversely proportional to the square of the distance between the contiguous bodies as indicated in Eq. (11.24), drop off more rapidly than the electrical forces. In this case, therefore, the adhesion is determined mainly by the electrical component. [Pg.131]

Let us remember that the quantity d J is understood to be the diameter of a spherical particle equivalent in contact area to the cylindrical particle. Since the adhesion in a liquid medium is determined to a great degree by the contact area between particles and surface, the introduction of the equivalent diameter means that the adhesive interaction of the cylindrical and equivalent spherical particle wiU be exactly the same. [Pg.216]

When particles are embedded, the contact area between particle and surface is increased in proportion to the product Hd, where H is the depth of embedment. The increase in true contact area, in turn, increases the forces of adhesion and friction. Also, the aerodynamic force of the stream is reduced as a result of a decrease in the drag on the particles, this aerodynamic force becoming zero when the depth of embedment is greater than the particle diameter. [Pg.277]

This dependence was obtained on the basis of Eq. (X.3) with allowance for the contact area between particle and surface, as determined by Eq. (11.59). [Pg.348]

Features of Adhesion on Rough Surfaces. Actual surfaces may have irregularities that change the area of contact between particles and surface, the gap between the contiguous bodies, and the adhesive interaction. [Pg.145]

The value of F q can be calculated not only from Eq. (XII.2), but also from a known value of the potential difference (see Section 15) arising in the contact zone between particles and surface. The contact potential difference referred to 1 cm of contact area for particles of talc, cinders, mica, nickel, or silicon with an air relative humidity of 50% will vary from 0.21 to 0.87 V, i.e., it will reach levels at which the attractive forces due to the contact potential difference will have a considerable effect on the dust adhesion (see Section 15). [Pg.377]

Possibility of Calculating the Area of Contact Between Particle and Surface. The force of adhesion depends on the area of contact of the particle with a plane surface, since the force of molecular interaction and the electrical component of the forces of adhesion are proportional to the area of the actual contact zone. [Pg.90]

The reason for the fall in adhesion is the fact that the Gardin-ol film formed (Fig. V.ll) has a crystal structure, so that the surface acquires a relief this tends to reduce the true contact area between particles and substrate (see 14). [Pg.189]

Cell materials under certain conditions may undergo undesirable phase transition that leads to cell capacity fade. Jahn-Teller distortion occurring in IiMn204 at 280 K is an example of this kind of failure mechanism related to the intrinsic stability of the molecular structure. Upon particle fracture, the contact surface area between particles and electrolyte greatly increases, and this may strongly affect electrode dissolution and the stabiUty of the SEI layer. [Pg.899]

Most commercial varieties of diarylide yellow pigments are materials with comparatively fine pigment particles and specific surface areas between 50 and 90 m2/g. [Pg.239]

P.O.5 is one of the most significant organic pigments. Two product lines with different particle sizes are available which differ considerably in their coloristic properties. The varieties with coarser particle sizes and specific surface areas between ca. 10 and 12 m2/g are much more reddish and duller than the types with somewhat finer particle sizes and specific surface areas between 15 and 25 m2/g. [Pg.276]

The link between colloids and surfaces follows naturally from the fact that particulate matter has a high surface area to mass ratio. The surface area of a 1cm diameter sphere (4jtr ) is 3.14 cm, whereas the surface area of the same amount of material but in the form of 0.1 pm diameter spheres (i.e. the size of the particles in latex paint) is 314 000 cm. The enormous difference in surface area is one of the reasons why the properties of the surface become very important for colloidal solutions. One everyday example is that organic dye molecules or pollutants can be effectively removed from water by adsorption onto particulate activated charcoal because of its high surface area. This process is widely used for water purification and in the oral treatment of poison victims. [Pg.6]

The nanoparticles had an average particle size (APS) between 20 and 60 nm and BET surface areas between 17 and 58 rn2 g 1, which decreased with increasing calcination temperature, reaching values below 1 m2 g 1 at 750 °C. To verify the... [Pg.299]

Nanocomposites are already making an impact on the choice and use of polymeric materials. As the dimensions of the particles diminish into the range of a few nanometers, surface area effects dominate, changing fundamentally the interactions between particle and polymer. Often nanocomposites containing less than 5% additive have substantially improved properties with no adverse effects. [Pg.218]

Monolayers of micro- and nanoparticles at fluid/liquid interfaces can be described in a similar way as surfactants or polymers, easily studied via surface pressure/area isotherms. Such studies provide information on the properties of particles (dimensions, interfacial contact angles), the structure of interfacial layers, interactions between the particles as well as about relaxation processes within the layers. Such type of information is important for understanding how the particles stabilize (or destabilize) emulsions and foams. The performed analysis shows that for an adequate description of II-A dependencies for nanoparticle monolayers the significant difference in size of particles and solvent molecules has be taken into account. The corresponding equations can be obtained by using a thermodynamic model developed for two-dimensional solutions. The obtained equations provide a satisfactory agreement with experimental data of surface pressure isotherms in a wide range of particle sizes between 75 pm and 7.5 nm. Moreover, the model can predict the area per particle and per solvent molecule close to real values. Similar equations were applied also to protein monolayers at liquid interfaces. [Pg.88]

A finely divided non-porous silica is produced by the flame hydrolysis of SiCl4. The resulting material, known as Cabosil or Aerosil is produced as 5-40 nm particles with surface areas between 50 and 400 m /g. This method of preparation produces a very pure form of silica that is frequently favored for basic research. ... [Pg.165]

The surface areas of a number of commercial palladium blacks were measured using the BET procedure as well as hydrogen chemisorption, electron microscopy and X-ray diffraction analysis. These data showed that these blacks had particle sizes ranging from about 7 to 140 nm and surface areas between 70 and 4 m2/g.20 Ruthenium blacks prepared by the reduction of different samples of ruthenium oxide and ruthenium chloride were found to have surface areas ranging from 3-20 m2/g.21... [Pg.233]


See other pages where Area between Particles and Surface is mentioned: [Pg.46]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.567]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.344]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.256]    [Pg.260]    [Pg.667]    [Pg.945]    [Pg.315]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.386]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.259]    [Pg.159]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.336]    [Pg.316]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.528]    [Pg.520]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.152]   


SEARCH



Particle surface area

Particle surface area and

Particle surfaces

© 2024 chempedia.info