AR construction

At different times of anaerobic adaptation cells were pelleted and Ars-activity was measured spectrophotometrically in the supernatant as a change in absorbance at 650 nm using X-SO4 as substrate. Strain MR16 carrying the chimeric hydA ars construct pMR16 and the recipient strain of C. reinhardtii were tested. 

For three dimensions, the AR construction algorithm is similar to the one described above—with the added possibility that we can find a (one-dimensional) connector on the AR that is described by a DSR. Glasser et al. (1992) defined conditions under which DSRs appear on the AR along with a direct method for finding the feed addition rate, q. While the conditions for DSRs appear to occur infrequently, examples have been constructed in the space of conversion, temperature, and residence time where the DSR was a prominent part of the AR. Nevertheless, Hildebrandt and co-workers conclude that most ARs will consist only of CSTR and PFR surfaces. In dealing with n-dimensional problems, Hildebrandt and Feinberg noted that the AR boundary is defined by line segments and PFR trajectories, with at most n structures needed to define a point on the AR boundary and n + 1 structures needed to define an interior point of the AR. Thus, for three-dimensional problems, at most three parallel structures (PFRs, CSTRs, DSRs) are needed to define any AR boundary point. 

This section indicates that is possible to transfect cells with GFP fusion proteins of the AR families. The co-localization of these proteins with fluorescent ligands provides a link that allows comparison with native cell systems that do not possess such useful tags but that bind the fluorescent ligands. However, an additional utility is provided by the ability to label receptors in native systems with GFP, which provides the opportunity for receptor translocation studies in native cells. This has been accomplished on two levels. First, by in vitro transfection of native tissues or cells (see Fig. 1C) and second by creating transgenic mice harboring the GFP-AR constructs (see Chapter 7). 

Another approach to the C matrix construction is a CSF-driven approach proposed by Knowles et al.. With this approach, the density matrix elements dlgrs ars constructed for all combinations of orbital indices p, q, r and s, but for a fixed CSF labeled by n. Each column of the matrix C is constructed in the same way that the Fock matrix F is computed except that the arrays D" and d" are used instead of D and d. As with the F matrix construction described earlier, there are two choices for the ordering of the innermost DO loops. One choice results in an inner product assembly method while the other choice results in an outer product assembly method. The inner product choice, which does not allow the density matrix sparseness to be exploited, results in SDOT operations of length m or about m, depending on the integral storage scheme. The outer product choice, which does allow the density matrix sparseness to be exploited, has an effective vector length of n, the orbital basis dimension. However, like the second index-driven method described above, this may involve some extraneous effort associated with redundant orbital rotation variables in the active-active block of the C matrix. 

For small residence times, the performance of a PFR is similar to a CSTR for an equivalent feed point and residence time. In deriving the differential equation for a PFR, one must perform a mass balance over a differential plug of material that is assumed to contain an even composition (in effect, a small CSTR). In Chapter 8, a number of different AR construction methods are described that approximate PFR solution trajectories by many small CSTRs in series. 

The form of this expression is similar to the CSTR equation (Equation 4.8). Certainly, if the substitution r = 1/a is made, then the resulting expression is identical to the CSTR equation with feed point given by C = Cf. It is therefore possible for both CSTR and PFR behavior to be achieved in a DSR under the correct conditions. The generalized DSR expression is thus useful in approximating CSTR and PFR concentrations. Although these approximations might appear impractical, particularly for CSTRs, they find use as a theoretical tool. This dual-natured behavior of DSRs is also useful in many AR construction algorithms. 

From these assumptions, it is evident that expressing T as a linear combination of Tj and T2 only occurs under extraordinary constraints. It is therefore unlikely that temperature may be mixed in the same manner as concentration or residence time for the purpose of AR constructions. The construction of candidate regions using temperature are generally not considered with temperature on a dedicated axis, such as with concentration and residence time. The role... 

AR constmctions for these three scenarios will be discussed next, which are facilitated by the AR construction framework discussed in Section 5.2. 

Note that the ehange in objective function alone does not require a new AR construction. This is because the feed point and kinetics have not changed. There is no need to generate a new AR and re-solve the problem for the new objective function. This allows for multiple optimizations with different objective functions to be investigated from a single construction—the AR represents the solution to all feasible optimization problems for a given feed. 

S.4.2.3 Feed and Equilibrium Points The feed stream is assumed to be pure in component A so that Cf = [1, 0] mol/L. It is good practice to locate any equilibrium points for the kinetics provided, if possible. This will assist with AR construction later on and will also provide insight into areas of the construction space (Ca-Cb space) where unexpected behavior might occur. Determination of the equilibrium points is performed by setting the component rate expressions to zero and then solving for the set of concentrations that satisfy the system of equations, hence... 

Although multiple steady states do not arise often, their unpredictable behavior may present considerable challenges to the designer. Knowledge of when multiple steady states could occur for a set of kinetics and feed point is therefore desirable when conducting AR constructions on an unfamiliar system for the first time. 

In Chapter 8, we shall discuss an automated AR construction algolthm that uses this property of the complement region to compute candidate regions. This algorithm can then be used to verify this statement... 

However, all of the AR constructions discussed thus far have originated from viewing data in the phase plane (concentration space) only. Thus, the candidate regions produced from this perspective have catered toward problems involving concentration only. 

In keeping with this theme, let us now look at AR constructions involving reactor volume, in the form of residence time. AR constructions involving residence time are easily adapted from concepts in concentration space. In order to maintain the useful geometric properties of mixing for residence time constructions—which are necessary in AR theory—all that must be established is that there is compatibility of residence time with mixing operations (specifically linear mixing) and reaction operations (rate fields). 

Since r also obeys a linear mixing law, residence time may be incorporated into AR constructions and treated as if it is a component in the concentration vector C. That is, T may be viewed as a pseudo component in C. 

This appears only for historical convention. In practice, the position of t as a component in C does not affect AR constructions in any way. 

Although residence time shares similar geometric traits to concentration, AR constructions in residence time space are inherently different to constructions solely in concentration space. Since there is no limitation on the value of residence time used (we are allowed to make the system residence time as large as desired), the corresponding AR boundaries may then also be arbitrarily large. 

Equation 5.10c may be used in conjunction with the AR construction to analyze the profitability of the system. Specification of a value for n results in a function of t and c (a curve in c -t space). These curves may then be overlaid over the AR to find the point of intersection with the AR boundary. Payback periods of 2, 5, and 10 years have been specified in other words, n = 2, 5, 10 years. These results are shown in Figure 5.30. 

This chapter marks the end of Section I of the book. All of the information discussed up to this point provides a firm foundation of the basics of AR theory. In the following chapters, we shall extend on these ideas, and relate them to higher dimensional constructions. Automated AR construction methods and variable density systems will also be discussed, which will allow us to tackle even more realistic problems. 

Furthermore, when AR constructions were carried out in previous chapters, they were described without adequate justification of why the resulting region represented the true AR. In order for these properties to be validated, and also in preparation for higher dimensional examples to be discussed (in Chapter 7), a more detailed AR theory, generalized to n-dimensional spaces, is required. This theory also assists in understanding of the kinds of reactor structures that should be expected when higher dimensional systems are considered in general. 

Much of the content in this chapter is taken from important contributions by Martin Feinberg (Feinberg, 1999, 2(X)0a, 2000b Feinberg and Hildebrandt, 1997). As will be shown, results from four papers by Feinberg, in particular, broadly define the major findings of AR theory in concentration space—at the time of writing, these results have yet to be expanded to wider state spaces, such as mass fraction space. It is for this reason that primary focus will be placed on AR constructions in concentration space alone wherein density is assumed constant. 

Introduction Given a system of reactions, it is possible to compute bounds in concentration space wherein all feasible concentrations must lie. This space is typically much larger than the space of achievable concentrations (the AR). Consequently, we can use this space as an upper bound on the set of feasible concentrations that the AR must reside in. We call this space the stoichiometric subspace and denote it by the set S. Determining S is also useful for AR construction algorithms, which are discussed in Chapter 8. 

A useful consequence of the dimension of the AR may be used to relate the maximum number of parallel structures needed to generate the AR, which is achieved by use of Caratheodory s theorem (Carathdodory, 1911 Eckhoff, 1993). Feinberg (2000a) shows that for an AR constructed in IR, the following limits, in terms of parallel reactor structures, may be enforced ... 

Three-dimensional Van de Vusse kinetics has been used extensively in AR research papers in the past. Since the system is well understood, AR practitioners often use the system as an acid test for many AR construction algorithms and hypotheses. Understanding this system therefore assists in understanding many research investigations that employ the system, and future research in the field of AR theory is easier to undertake if we are able to understand past work. 

Isothermal operation is assumed. AR constructions for the system frequently occur in c -Cb-Cd space. We will hence adopt this convention and define the concentration vector as = [0, Cg, Cd] mol/L. The corresponding rate vector, r(C), is then defined by the following set of component rate expressions ... 

This concludes the AR construction for the three-dimensional Van de Vusse kinetics. Note that the inclusion of critical CSTRs and DSRs complicates construction, but these structures are required in order to generate the true AR. 

For the full three-dimensional BTX system, we find that the AR construction procedure is similar to that for Van de Vusse kinetics. Hence, we can summarize the key steps as follows ... 

Figure 7.10 The AR for the BTX system (a) computed by an automated AR construction algorithm. The region obtained is in agreement with the theoretical prediction given by (b), although there is still a moderate difference between the two regions.

An adiabatic constraint An AR will be constructed when an adiabatic energy balance is introduced. The implications of how this constraint impacts AR construction will provide for an interesting discussion. Temperature will be an important consideration in this instance, and hence it is important to understand how temperature may be accommodated in AR constructions. 

AR Construction Since the reactor temperature has been expressed explicitly in terms of components x and y, construction of the AR for the adiabatic system from this point onward follows the same approach as that for an isothermal system. The system is two-dimensional as there are two independent reactions participating in the system, and therefore we need only consider combinations of PFRs and CSTRs in the construction of the candidate region. It is customary to begin by generating the PER trajectory and CSTR locus from the feed. Due to the nonlinear nature of the kinetics introduced by the adiabatic constraint, the system exhibits multiple CSTR solutions from the feed point. We... 

There are methods that exist that address these constraints however, these require additional theory to understand. In the absence of an explicit temperature expression, it is often easier to tackle the problem numerically, with the aid of an automated AR construction scheme. In Chapter 8, a number of AR construction methods are discussed that may be used for nonisothermal systems. Although these methods often do not suggest an optimal reactor structure, knowledge of the limits of achievability for a nonisothermal is often sufficient for setting design targets. 

ARs may also be generated for systems where a control parameter (often temperature) is employed. This theory is not part of the scope of this book, although we do provide a brief discussion of the relevant theory here for interest. The following discussion has ideas borrowed from Godorr et al. (1999), and all of the following discussions apply to alone. For higher dimensional problems, the use of an automated AR construction algorithm is often used instead. 

We note again that these conditions are specific to IR only. Although similar results may be derived for higher dimensions, one often employs the use of an automated AR construction method instead. 

Yet, a number of complex, real-life problems are beyond the scope of traditional analytical methods, such as those methods discussed here. For this reason, we are often reliant on the results obtained by automated AR construction... 

In this chapter, we wish to touch on a number of automated AR construction schemes. At the time of writing, research in AR theory has witnessed a shift toward the development of numerical AR constmction algorithms, with less emphasis placed on general AR theory. These developments have arisen primarily out of a practical need to determine candidate regions for complex, higher dimensional problems, which are not easily computed by hand, but which are still important for practical problems of interest. AR construction methods provide a numerical basis wherefrom theoretical predictions may be compared with in the search for a sufficiency condition. Inasmuch as how... 

---