Analytical reagents assay

Data in Fig. 9 show that ferrocene is the most reactive in this family of HRP substrates. The rate constant k7 of 2 x 105 M-1 s 1 at pH 7 and 25 °C indicates that its reactivity is comparable with the frequently used electron donors of HRP. Ferrocene follows first-order kinetics and k7 should be compared with the ratio cat/ 4Vb where kc t and Km are the catalytic and the Michaelis constants for substrates obeying the Michaelis-Menten kinetics, respectively. Such are iodide, guaiacol, and ABTS (2,2 -azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6 -sulfonic acid) (128). The available ratios of 0.15 x 105, 1.3 x 105, and 34 x 105 M 1 s-1, respectively (129), indicate that ferrocene is more reactive than iodide and comparable with guaiacol. High reactivity of ferrocene makes it a convenient analytical reagent for routine assays of H2O2 in the presence of HRP by monitoring the enzymically produced ferricenium dye at 617 nm (113). 

Among chromenes, only the spiropyrans and their heterocyclic derivatives have found a wide practical application as photochromic substances.5 6,7-Chromenediols have been proposed as analytical reagents for the spectrophotometric assay of rare earth cations.279 Chromenes with structure and activity similar to those of hashish constituents have been prepared.280 A number of chromenes, mostly with aryl substituents in positions 2,3, and 4 have been patented as biologically active substances.126,280 290... 

The method of choice is dependent upon the analyte, the assay performance required to meet the intended application, the timeline, and cost-effectiveness. The assay requirements include sensitivity, selectivity, linearity, accuracy, precision, and method robustness. Assay sensitivity in general is in the order of IA > LC-MS/MS > HPLC, while selectivity is IA LC-MS/MS > HPLC. However, IA is an indirect method which measures the binding action instead of relying directly on the physico-chemical properties of the analyte. The IA response versus concentration curve follows a curvilinear relationship, and the results are inherently less precise than for the other two methods with linear concentration-response relationships. The method development time for IA is usually longer than that for LC/MS-MS, mainly because of the time required for the production and characterization of unique antibody reagents. Combinatorial tests to optimize multiple factors in several steps of some IA formats are more complicated, and also result in a longer method refinement time. The nature of IAs versus that of LC-MS/MS methods are compared in Table 6.1. However, once established, IA methods are sensitive, consistent, and very cost-effective for the analysis of large volumes of samples. The more expensive FTMS or TOF-MS methods can be used to complement IA on selectivity confirmation. 

In the neutral red (cell viability) and total protein (cell proliferation) assays, cells are treated with various concentrations of a test substance in petri or multiwell dishes after a period of exposure, the substance is washed out of the medium. (An analytical reagent is added in the case of protein measurements.) Neutral red is a supravital dye, which accumulates in the lysosomes of viable, uninjured cells, and it can be washed out of cells, which have been damaged. In the protein test, Kenacid blue is added and reacts with cellular protein. Controlled cells are dark blue killed cells are lighter colored. The IC50 (the concentration which inhibits by 50%) is determined the test can be rapidly performed with automation. However, materials must be solubilized into the aqueous cell media for analysis. For many test materials this will require large dilutions which eliminate properties of the materials which cause irritation. 

Carrier-free Na l (40mCi/mL) was produced at the Radiopharmaceuticals Division of the Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (BARC) in Mumbai, India. Yellow tetrazolium MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazolyl-2)-2,5-diphenyltetra-zolium bromide) from Sigma (USA) was used for the cytotoxicity assay. Absorbance was measured at 550 nm in an ELISA reader (Bio-Tek, USA). Culture media and supplements were obtained from Sigma, and aU other chemicals and solvents were of analytical reagent grade, procured from reputed manufacturers in India. 

Mallinckrodt s Analytical Reagent red lead (assay 85-90 per cent) was used. Merck s and Baker s N.F. V red lead are also quite satisfactory. Previously prepared lead tetraacetate is in no way preferable to red lead for this oxidation. 

Bound fraction is separated from free the signal [AgAb ] or [Abl-Ag-Ab2 ] complex (the Ab fraction occupied by the analyte) is measured. The amount of analyte is proportional to the bound complex in a hyperbolic function. Methods similar to those used for transforming or linearizing limited-reagent assays can be applied to these excess-reagent functions. 

Generally, polyclonal antibodies are easier to produce, and high-affinity polyclonal antibodies can be obtained. Monoclonal antibodies are more specific to a certain epitope. They provide continuous production of exactly the same defined reagent and are more preferable for excess-reagent assays. The double sandwich technique has used two antibodies from monoclonals or combinations of mono- and polyclonals, with specificity against two different epitopes of the analyte. One antibody functions as a capturing antibody for the analyte and the other as the label carrier (118). 

Fig. 3 Double-antibody sandwich technique. The capturing antibody (Abl) is immobilized onto the solid phase. The analyte from the sample is captured by forming Abl-Ag immunocomplex. After washing off the extraneous materials from the sample, the reporting antibody (Ab2, which has an enzyme label in this illustration) is introduced. The double-antibody sandwich is formed Abl-Ag-Ab2E. Compounds not recognized by both Abl and Ab2 will be washed away. A chromogenic substrate is added to produce the product for detection. The occupied Ab2 by the Ag is measured this is an excess-reagent assay. As the sample analyte concentration increases, the signal responses increases proportionally.

The double-antibody sandwich technique is applicable to large molecules. Small analytes have difficulty forming the double-antibody sandwich immunocomplex. The smallest analytes reported that have been used in a double sandwich assay are peptides of around 10 amino acid residues (158). The double-antibody sandwich technique measures the occupied antibodies using an excess-reagent assay protocol. A limited-reagent assay protocol can also be designed, as shown in Fig. 4. In this format, the antibodies are immobilized onto the solid phase,... 

Fig. 4 Antibody immobilization in a limited-reagent assay format. The antibody is immobilized onto the solid-phase support. Labeled antigen and sample are introduced, and they compete with one another to form immunocomplex (Ab-Ag or Ab-AgE) with the limited antibody sites on the solid-phase support. After washing, the substrate is added to produce the detecting product. The antibody unoccupied by the sample analyte is measured as the concentration increases, the signal responses decreases.

Acceptance criteria for accuracy and precision of standards and QCs must be determined during method validation, and are analogous to acceptance criteria for chromatographic methods. IAs may not be as inherently precise as chemical methods, because IAs measure a reaction rather than a physicochemical property of the analyte. In cases where internal standards are not used for recovery correction, two to three replicate assays may be conducted on a single sample to improve precision. Despite all of the available mathematical transformations, it is important to remember that this is not a linear system and caution must be used as the concentrations approach either the upper or lower end of the standard curve. For example, variability becomes too large to be acceptable as the B/B0 value goes beyond <0.1 or >0.9 for most limited reagent assays. 

Even if a kit is not specifically designed for animal usage, or is specifically designed for a particular species, it is possible that the manufacturers have data to support the use of their kit with different species. Some suppliers do provide information on species cross-reactivity and some also provide a complete list of their kits that can be used in other species. When selecting a kit for different species, it may be advisable to search for a species-specific kit. The main reason for using a species-specific kit is that it ensures reactivity of the analyte with assay key reagent(s) and it is likely that there will be fewer problems with matrix effects. Ifa species-specific kit is not available, a search of the literature can be performed to investigate whether other researchers have used specific commercial kits, that is, to obtain information on potential cross-reactivity and so on. 

---