Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Analytical methods, general Sample pretreatment

In Chapter 1 a general pattern for analytical procedures was introduced and the various stages of an analysis identified as sampling pretreatment separation or masking measurement interpretation of results. Subsequent chapters have dealt with separation methods, measurement techniques and the interpretation of results in more detail. It remains to examine sampling more closely and to consider, by way of example, some overall analytical schemes. [Pg.503]

In general, the calibration curve method is suitable for all samples where the test substance is not bound in complexes or when it can be liberated from complexes by suitable sample pretreatment. Otherwise, the compositions of the samples and of the standard solutions must be as similar as possible to obtain results with acceptable accuracy. In view of the ISE potential drift, the calibration must be repeated often (at least twice a day). As mentioned above, the precision of the determination is not particularly high with a common precision of the potential measureihent at a laboratory temperature of 1 mV the relative error is 4% for univalent and 8% for divalent ions [58], However, this often suffices for practical analytical purposes. An advantage is that the same precision... [Pg.104]

Colistin (COL) is a multicomponent antibiotic (polymyxins E) that is produced by strains of inverse Bacillus polymyxa. It consists of a mixture of several closely related decapeptides with a general structure composed of a cyclic heptapeptide moiety and a side chain acetylated at the N-terminus by a fatty acid. Up to 13 different components have been identified. The two main components of colistin are polymyxins El and E2 they include the same amino acids but a different fatty acid (216). A selective and sensitive HPLC method was developed for the determination of COL residues in milk and four bovine tissues (muscle, liver, kidney, and fat). The sample pretreatment consists of protein precipitation with trichloracetic acid (TCA), solid-phase purification on Cl 8 SPE cartridges, and precolumn derivatization of colistin with o-phthalaldehyde and 2-mercaptoethanol in borate buffer (pH 10.5). The last step was performed automatically, and the resulting reaction mixture was injected into a switching HPLC system including a precolumn and the reversed-phase analytical column. Fluorescence detection was used. The structural study of El and E2 derivatives was carried out by HPLC coupled with an electrospray MS. Recoveries from the preseparation procedure were higher than 60%. [Pg.679]

We will not go into further detail, but rather we will discuss the basic steps and the generally accepted distinction today of the notions principle , method , and procedure . The main steps of the analytical process are sampling, sample pretreatment, measurement, and interpretation of the results (the collected data) (Fig. 1-1). Procedure means all activities from sample definition to the extraction of information by interpreting the data. Methods may be defined as the processes carried out between sample pretreatment and interpretation of the results. And finally principle describes the process in which analyte matter produces a signal that is further treated. [Pg.5]

Apart from the development of a general method for the analysis of Hg species (see the previous section) during recent years, many applications have been developed and refined for seafood matrices. For the determination of Hg species in seafood, a wide range of methods primarily focus on the determination of Me-Hg. Some publications focus on selected aspects of sample pretreatment, while others deal with the features of the analytical instruments used. When higher detection power for speciation analysis is requested, GC-ICP-MS is often the method of choice. The procedure is based on three steps, as illustrated in Figure 22.3. [Pg.713]

As mentioned before, analytical methods required for herbicide determination must be very sensitive, selective, and robust. Normalized methods generally use liquid and gas chromatography techniques with detectors more or less specific. Sample pretreatment such as derivatization steps or cleanup of the extracts are sometimes mandatory prior to analytical measurement. [Pg.1005]

The determination of chromium can be performed by a great number of physicochemical methods, with different detection powers, working range, and application field. Here, only those techniques that have found more general applications in different fields can be briefly discussed. The selection of a method for a special analytical task is not only dependent on the detection power and other performance characteristics of the technique, but is highly dependent on the sample constitution, the required sample pretreatment and means of sample introduction, and, last but not least, on its availability (Table 3). [Pg.689]

TLC is generally less sensitive and gives worse separation than HPLC. However, it predominates over HPLC in at least two aspects It allows for the analysis of many samples at the same time, and it requires limited sample pretreatment. These features are very important in the analysis of antibiotics, which usually concerns controlling their level in many complicated matrices such as blood, urine, dietary products, and pharmaceuticals. Thus, TLC can be a very useful screening method preceding HPLC analysis. Nevertheless, there are also many examples of analytical applications of TLC, which can achieve selectivity and sensitivity comparable with those characteristic of HPLC. The future of the analytical option in antibiotic analysis is connected with progress in detection and the development of FFPC methods. [Pg.95]

In general all labware used for clean-up procedures or other sample pretreatments must be acid-washed to remove nickel contamination. Therefore analytical methods should be preferably used with minimum expenditure in chemicals, labware, and handling because each analytical procedure can add to the contamination. If digestion procedures using mineral acids cannot be omitted, e.g., in the case of tissue analysis, it is not possible to minimize contamination below the lower ppb range even if the chemicals have been further purified. Because of the omnipresence of nickel it is irrevocably necessary to analyze blank values within each series of analyses. [Pg.513]

The small inner diameter of the separation capillary used in CE implies a short optical pathway, and the consequent poor concentration sensitivity when conventional UV detectiOTi is used. To overcome this drawback several techniques have been developed some of them consist in application of general approaches that are not specifically addressed to CE analysis of alkaloids. One is the use of LIF detector for analysis of alkaloids with native fluorescence [68, 69] or after their off-line derivatization [64, 88, 112]. Sample pretreatment, a second major approach, is popularly employed in combination with sample extraction and can be conveniently applied in analysis of alkaloids because they can be easily retained in cationic-exchange sorbents in solid-phase extraction (SPE) mode [113, 114]. It may be interesting to focus on more specific aspects to detect very low levels of analytes using limited amoimts of samples to this regard chemiluminescence reactions and the use of online preconcentration methods will be considered. [Pg.1185]

Conventional rubber compound analysis requires several instrumental techniques, in addition to considerable pretreatment of the sample to isolate classes of components, before these selected tests can be definitive. Table 2.5 lists some general analytical tools. Spectroscopic methods such as FTIR and NMR often encounter difficulties in the analysis of vulcanised rubbers since they are insoluble and usually contain many kinds of additives such as a curing agent, plasticisers, stabilisers and fillers. Pyrolysis is advantageous for the practical analysis of insoluble polymeric materials. [Pg.33]


See other pages where Analytical methods, general Sample pretreatment is mentioned: [Pg.432]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.291]    [Pg.312]    [Pg.349]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.947]    [Pg.2966]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.1534]    [Pg.264]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.893]    [Pg.689]    [Pg.691]    [Pg.2645]    [Pg.387]    [Pg.210]    [Pg.394]    [Pg.343]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.298]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.86]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.504]    [Pg.210]    [Pg.217]    [Pg.365]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.61 ]




SEARCH



General Analytes

Sample methods

Sample pretreatment

Sampling methods

Sampling methods pretreatments

© 2024 chempedia.info