Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Amphiphiles interfacial tension

Amphiphile Interfacial tension y(Dodecane)/mN/m Interfacial tension y (Isooctane)/mN/m... [Pg.330]

These are molecules which contain both hydrophilic and hydrophobic units (usually one or several hydrocarbon chains), such that they love and hate water at the same time. Familiar examples are lipids and alcohols. The effect of amphiphiles on interfaces between water and nonpolar phases can be quite dramatic. For example, tiny additions of good amphiphiles reduce the interfacial tension by several orders of magnitude. Amphiphiles are thus very efficient in promoting the dispersion of organic fluids in water and vice versa. Added in larger amounts, they associate into a variety of structures, filhng the material with internal interfaces which shield the oil molecules—or in the absence of oil the hydrophobic parts of the amphiphiles—from the water [3]. Some of the possible structures are depicted in Fig. 1. A very rich phase... [Pg.632]

The influence of amphiphiles on interfacial properties interfacial tension, wetting behavior, dynamical aspects such as the question of how small amounts of surfactant influence the kinetics of phase separation. [Pg.636]

Lattice models for bulk mixtures have mostly been designed to describe features which are characteristic of systems with low amphiphile content. In particular, models for ternary oil/water/amphiphile systems are challenged to reproduce the reduction of the interfacial tension between water and oil in the presence of amphiphiles, and the existence of a structured disordered phase (a microemulsion) which coexists with an oil-rich and a water-rich phase. We recall that a structured phase is one in which correlation functions show oscillating behavior. Ordered lamellar phases have also been studied, but they are much more influenced by lattice artefacts here than in the case of the chain models. [Pg.656]

Even though the basic idea of the Widom model is certainly very appealing, the fact that it ignores the possibihty that oil/water interfaces are not saturated with amphiphiles is a disadvantage in some respect. The influence of the amphiphiles on interfacial properties cannot be studied in principle in particular, the reduction of the interfacial tension cannot be calculated. In a sense, the Widom model is not only the first microscopic lattice model, but also the first random interface model configurations are described entirely by the conformations of their amphiphilic sheets. [Pg.657]

The phase separation process at late times t is usually governed by a law of the type R t) oc f, where R t) is the characteristic domain size at time t, and n an exponent which depends on the universality class of the model and on the conservation laws in the dynamics. At the presence of amphiphiles, however, the situation is somewhat complicated by the fact that the amphiphiles aggregate at the interfaces and reduce the interfacial tension during the coarsening process, i.e., the interfacial tension depends on the time. This leads to a pronounced slowing down at late times. In order to quantify this effect, Laradji et al. [217,222] have proposed the scaling ansatz... [Pg.667]

Petroleum recovery typically deals with conjugate fluid phases, that is, with two or more fluids that are in thermodynamic equilibrium. Conjugate phases are also encountered when amphiphiles fe.g.. surfactants or alcohols) are used in enhanced oil recovery, whether the amphiphiles are added to lower interfacial tensions, or to create dispersions to improve mobility control in miscible flooding 11.21. [Pg.292]

At a given NaCI concentration, an increase in temperature resulted in an increase in interfacial tension. In contrast, for a narrow range of CaCI concentrations, interfacial tensions decreased with increasing temperatures. Changes of the amphiphile at the oil/water interface accounted for some of the experimental observations. Since the extent of oil desaturation is dependent on interfacial tension, the tension data could be used to assess the ability of surfactants to reduce oil saturations in the reservoir for application of surfactants and foams to thermal recovery processes. [Pg.327]

For results where comparisons could be made, the interfacial tension behavior was practically independent of the type of heavy oil used. Interfacial tensions strongly depended on the surfactant type, temperature, and NaCI and CaCI2 concentrations. Changes in the structure of the amphiphile at the oil/water interface is affected by these variables and accounted for some of the experimental observations. [Pg.343]

The rheological properties of a fluid interface may be characterized by four parameters surface shear viscosity and elasticity, and surface dilational viscosity and elasticity. When polymer monolayers are present at such interfaces, viscoelastic behavior has been observed (1,2), but theoretical progress has been slow. The adsorption of amphiphilic polymers at the interface in liquid emulsions stabilizes the particles mainly through osmotic pressure developed upon close approach. This has become known as steric stabilization (3,4.5). In this paper, the dynamic behavior of amphiphilic, hydrophobically modified hydroxyethyl celluloses (HM-HEC), was studied. In previous studies HM-HEC s were found to greatly reduce liquid/liquid interfacial tensions even at very low polymer concentrations, and were extremely effective emulsifiers for organic liquids in water (6). [Pg.185]

Low-molecular-weight surfactants ( emulsifiers ) are important ingredients in food products. The types of surfactants most commonly studied in food colloids research are phospholipids (lecithin), mono/diglycerides (particularly glycerol monostearate), polysorbates (Tweens), sorbitan monostearate or monooleate (Spans), and sucrose esters. These small lipid-based amphiphiles can typically lower the interfacial tension to a greater extent than the macromolecular amphiphiles such as proteins and certain gums (Bos and van Vliet, 2001). [Pg.323]

It is now time to reconsider the simple case of a two-phase system that contains two different types of molecules. If molecules of phase a are polar and molecules of phase [3 are nonpolar, the introduction of amphiphilic molecules that are capable of associating with either one of the two bulk phase molecules will result in an accumulation at the interface. Hence, these molecules will have a true excess concentration at the interface. Figure D3.5.4 illustrates that once surfactants adsorb at interfaces, the concentration within the interface may be larger than in any of the other phases. In order to predict the influence that these adsorbed surfactant molecules can have on the properties of the bulk system, interfacial chemists must be able to quantify the number of molecules that are adsorbed at the interface, that is, they must be able to measure the interfacial coverage. Unfortunately, it is extremely difficult, if not impossible, to directly measure the concentration of surface-active molecules adsorbed in a two-dimensional plane. This is where the thermodynamic concepts discussed earlier prove to be very useful, because a relationship between the interfacial coverage (G) and the interfacial tension (y) can be derived. [Pg.618]

Additives are usually amphiphilic in nature, and thus are either ionic or neutral surfactants or even polymers. The role of surfactants in solvent extraction is ambiguous. Usually, they should be avoided as they lower the interfacial tension, which may lead to emulsion formation in an agitated extractor. However, every metal-loaded ion exchanger is amphiphilic, and can adsorb at the interface or aggregate in the bulk phase. This occurrence is well known with sodium or other metals [17], and above a critical surfactant concentration (cmc, critical micelle concentration) micellar aggregates are formed. A dimensionless geometric parameter is decisive for the structure of the associates, according to Fig. 10.6 ... [Pg.319]

Cosurfactants are molecules with weak amphiphilic properties that are mixed with the surfactant(s) to enhance their ability to reduce the interfacial tension of a system and promote the formation of a ME [3]. Cosolvents have also been described as weak amphiphilic molecules that tend to distribute between the aqueous phase, the... [Pg.772]


See other pages where Amphiphiles interfacial tension is mentioned: [Pg.2363]    [Pg.2376]    [Pg.2376]    [Pg.2377]    [Pg.2381]    [Pg.2574]    [Pg.657]    [Pg.659]    [Pg.660]    [Pg.538]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.427]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.190]    [Pg.461]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.285]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.631]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.264]    [Pg.505]    [Pg.385]    [Pg.386]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.245]    [Pg.247]    [Pg.324]    [Pg.326]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.771]    [Pg.780]    [Pg.11]   


SEARCH



Effects of amphiphiles on surface and interfacial tension

Interfacial tension

© 2024 chempedia.info