Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Affinity interactions

In principle all studies to measure interaction between two molecules are affinity interactions. What is described imder this heading could also be described as traditional cell biological or biochemical approaches to measure binding between two systems. It was historically started with the observation of whole cells interacting, before more sophisticated methods of cell fractionation and artificial reconstruction have progressed to the point that almost any molecule can be isolated and packed into a de novo assembly to test for its role in the intact system. [Pg.1079]


Inflammation. Figure 1 Sequence of events in the recruitment of leukocytes in postcapillary venules adjacent to injured tissue. At the site of lesion, diverse reactive substances stimulate the endothelium to produce inflammatory cytokines, chemoattractants and other inflammatory mediators. The cytokine-activated endothelium expresses adhesion molecules that lead to the low affinity interactions between leukocytes and endothelium, which is mediated by selectins and described as rolling. Subsequently integrins mediate the firm adhesion of leukocytes, which allows emigration of the cells from venules into the interstitial compartment. Activated mast cells, PMNs and macrophages secrete cytokines (TNFa), lipid mediators (LTB4) and other inflammatory players (histamine, NO). [Pg.628]

The structures of enzyme active sites, and other ligand binding pockets on enzymes, are ideally suited for high-affinity interactions with drug-like inhibitors. [Pg.1]

Each of these individual conformational states represents a unique opportunity for high-affinity interactions with drug molecules. [Pg.21]

Figure 5.6 Biphasic concentration-response plot for an enzyme displaying a high- and low-affinity binding interaction with an inhibitor. In panel A, the data are fit to Equation (5.4) and the best fit suggests a Hill coefficient of about 0.46. In panel B, the data are fitted to an equation that accounts for two, nonidentical binding interactions Vj/v0 = (a/(l + ([/]/ICs0))) + ((1 - a)/(l+([t]/IC(o)))> where a is an amplitude term for the population with high binding affinity, reflected by IC , and IC 0 is the IC50 for the lower affinity interaction. (See Copeland, 2000, for further details.)... Figure 5.6 Biphasic concentration-response plot for an enzyme displaying a high- and low-affinity binding interaction with an inhibitor. In panel A, the data are fit to Equation (5.4) and the best fit suggests a Hill coefficient of about 0.46. In panel B, the data are fitted to an equation that accounts for two, nonidentical binding interactions Vj/v0 = (a/(l + ([/]/ICs0))) + ((1 - a)/(l+([t]/IC(o)))> where a is an amplitude term for the population with high binding affinity, reflected by IC , and IC 0 is the IC50 for the lower affinity interaction. (See Copeland, 2000, for further details.)...
The affinity (interaction strength), multiple interactions, and the changes in concentration can be also monitored from those studies. To deliver data in real time, the natural phenomenon of surface plasmon resonance (SPR) is employed. Since the refractive index (r ) at the interface changes as molecules are immobilized on the sensor surface, instant measure of r provides real-time assessment. The Tlcxchip platform exploits grating-coupled SPR (GC-SPR) for this purpose. [Pg.235]

A convenient molecule from which to build trifunctionals is the amino acid, L-lysine. Its three functional groups, a-carboxy, a-amino, and e-amino, can be derivatized independently to contain three arms. Each arm can be designed to terminate in a complexing group able to participate in a particular type of conjugation reaction or affinity interaction. [Pg.336]

Coupling of affinity molecules to surfaces also can be enhanced by the use of discrete PEG linkers. Nishimura et al. (2005) modified an amino surface with a NHS-PEG -maleimide crosslinker to create a hydrophilic self-assembled monolayer (SAM) surface that was thiol reactive for the conjugation of sulfhydryl-modified RNAs. This array then was used to investigate the binding specificity of synthetic kanamycins with selected RNA sequences to prove the specific interaction of ribosomal RNA with this molecule. The PEG linkers on surfaces provide lower nonspecific binding character than alkyl linkers, when preparing SAM surfaces for affinity interactions. [Pg.709]

Yoon, H.C., Lee, D., and Kim, H.-S. (2002) Reversible affinity interactions of antibody molecules at functionalized dendrimer monolayer affinity-sensing surface with reusability. Anal. Chim. Acta 456, 209-218. [Pg.1130]

Another potential mechanism for protein retention is that ER proteins bind to each other to form large complexes that cannot be recruited in transport vesicles [27], This mechanism is known as kin recognition. Because the concentration of resident ER proteins can be very high (some had been estimated in the millimolar range), it can be achieved even with low-affinity interactions among resident proteins. [Pg.146]

Barker, E. L. and Blakely, R. D. (1996) Identification of a single amino acid, phenylalanine 586, that is responsible for high affinity interactions of tricyclic antidepressants with the human serotonin transporter. Mol. Pharmacol. 50, 957-965. [Pg.208]

The fundamental behaviour of stationary phase materials is related to their solubility-interaction properties. A hydrophobic phase acts as a partner to a hydrophobic interaction. An ionic phase acts as a partner for ion-ion interactions, and surface metal ions as a partner for ligand complex formation. A chiral phase partners chiral recognition, and specific three-dimensional phases partner affinity interactions. [Pg.31]

Hanakahi LA, Sun H, Maizels N (1999) High affinity interactions of nucleolin with G-G-paired rDNA. J Biol Chem 274 15908-15912... [Pg.141]

For immunoprecipitations from native tissues, one requires antibodies directed against both the fish and the bait proteins. Further, these antibodies should not bind to epitopes within the putative protein-protein BDs. It is technically difficult to determine low affinity or transient association among proteins by immunoprecipitation because low-affinity interactions may be lost by washing immune pellets to remove nonspecifically bound proteins. Also, one cannot manipulate protein concentrations to favor protein association as one can in a pull-down assay. Under these circumstances, probably the best method to use would be FRFT. [Pg.418]


See other pages where Affinity interactions is mentioned: [Pg.2061]    [Pg.2063]    [Pg.277]    [Pg.1304]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.247]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.367]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.213]    [Pg.366]    [Pg.508]    [Pg.577]    [Pg.678]    [Pg.1006]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.366]    [Pg.727]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.206]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.151 , Pg.156 ]




SEARCH



Affinity capillary electrophoresis analyte interactions

Affinity-interaction methods

Antigen-antibody affinity interactions

Carbohydrate affinity interactions

Chromatography metal-interaction affinity

Electron affinity interaction

Electron affinity, charge transfer interactions

Engineering Interactions and Predicting Affinity

Enzymes high-affinity interaction

Immunosensors affinity interactions

Interactions, analyte-ligand affinity chromatography

Ligand-receptor interactions affinity

Metal interaction chromatography affinity tags

Multireference configuration interaction affinity

Protein affinity chromatography molecular interaction

Protein-ligand interactions affinity measurements

Protein-ligand interactions binding affinity

Receptor-ligand interactions, affinity capillary electrophoresis

Solution, affinity interaction energy

Specific affinity interactions

© 2024 chempedia.info