Electron affinity interaction

It is now well established that a variety of organic molecules such as polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons with low ionization energies act as electron donors with the formation of radical cations when adsorbed on oxide surfaces. Conversely, electron-acceptor molecules with high electron affinity interact with donor sites on oxide surfaces and are converted to anion radicals. These surface species can either be detected by their electronic spectra (90-93, 308-310) or by ESR. The ESR results have recently been reviewed by Flockhart (311). Radical cation-producing substances have only scarcely been applied as poisons in catalytic reactions. Conclusions on the nature of catalytically active sites have preferentially been drawn by qualitative comparison of the surface spin concentration and the catalytic activity as a function of, for example, the pretreatment temperature of the catalyst. Only phenothiazine has been used as a specific poison for the butene-1 isomerization on alumina [Ghorbel et al. (312)). Tetra-cyaonoethylene, on the contrary, has found wide application as a poison during catalytic reactions for the detection of active sites with basic or electron-donor character. This is probably due to the lack of other suitable acidic probe or poison molecules. 

The metallic electrode materials are characterized by their Fermi levels. The position of the Fermi level relative to the eneigetic levels of the organic layer determines the potential barrier for charge carrier injection. The workfunction of most metal electrodes relative to vacuum are tabulated [103]. However, this nominal value will usually strongly differ from the effective workfunction in the device due to interactions of the metallic- with the organic material, which can be of physical or chemical nature [104-106]. Therefore, to calculate the potential barrier height at the interface, the effective work function of the metal and the effective ionization potential and electron affinity of the organic material at the interface have to be measured [55, 107],... 

Basically, the first approach to correlate the polyimide chain organization to the monomer structure was to take into consideration the electron affinity of the anhydride and the ionization potential of the diamine,10 as shown in Fig. 5.3. The strongest interactions between the polymeric chain are expected when the polyimide is prepared with the dianhydride having the highest electron affinity and die diamine with the lowest ionization potential. The strongest interchain interaction leads to high Tg and low solubility. 

In more detail, the interaction energy between donor and acceptor is determined by the ionisation potential of the donor and the electron affinity of the acceptor. The interaction energy increases with lowering of the former and raising of the latter. In the Mulliken picture (Scheme 2) it refers to a raising of the HOMO (highest occupied molecular orbital) and lowering of the LUMO (lowest unoccupied molecular orbital). Alternatively to this picture donor-acceptor formation can be viewed in a Born-Haber cycle, within two different steps (Scheme 3). 

The recent interest in the exploration of electrocatalytic phenomena from first principles can be traced to the early cluster calculations of Anderson [1990] and Anderson and Debnath [1983]. These studies considered the interaction of adsorbates with model metal clusters and related the potential to the electronegativity determined as the average of the ionization potential and electron affinity—quantities that are easily obtained from molecular orbital calculations. In some iterations of this model, changes in reaction chemistry induced by the electrochemical environment... 

Even in reactions involving excited states or in reactions between two radicals, the primary interaction which determines the reactivity is thought to proceed adiabatically. The probability of nonadiabatic charge transfer also may not be ignored between a molecular specie with small ionization potential and a specie with large electron affinity, in particular in the form of free, gaseous, or nonsolvated state. In that... 

Attempts were made at explaining the trends in reactivity through the use of both an electron-transfer model85 and a resonance interaction model,86,87 but without success. It seems that the trends in reactivity on a fine scale cannot be easily explained by such simple models, but instead depend on a multitude of factors, which may include the ionization potential of the metal, the electron affinity of the oxidant molecule, the energy gap between dns2 and dn+1s1 states, the M-O bond strength, and the thermodynamics of the reaction.57-81... 

After cocondensation of SiO (1226 cm 1) with alkali metal atoms like Na or K, new bands are detected at 1014 cm 1 (Na) or 1025 cm 1 (K). They can only be attributed to an SiO" anion because of the red shift of the SiO stretching vibration (with respect to that of uncoordinated SiO) and because of different isotopic splittings (28/29/30SiO, Si16/180) [21]. The formation of an ionic species M+(SiO) (M = Na, K) is in line with the results of quantum chemical calculations for the SiO anion (SiO d = 1.49 A, SiO" d = 1.55 A, "electron affinity" SiO + e + 1.06 eV —> SiO") [20]. Taking simple Coulomb interactions into consideration this species is very likely to have a strongly bent structure. The same situation occurs in gaseous NaCN (<(NaNC) = 81.2°) [22],... 

When parameters of the Pariser-Parr-Pople configuration interaction molecular orbital (PPP-CI MO) method were modified so as to reproduce the Aol)s values for l,3-di(5-aryl-l,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)benzenes 16 and 17, the calculated HOMO and LUMO energy levels corresponded with the experimental ionization potential and electron affinity values. The relationships between the electrical properties and molecular structures for the dyes were investigated. The absorption maximum wavelengths for amorphous films were found to be nearly equal to those for solution samples <1997PCA2350>. 

Fig. 10 Electrochemical energy level model for orbital mediated tunneling. Ap and Ac are the gas-and crystalline-phase electron affinities, 1/2(SCE) is the electrochemical potential referenced to the saturated calomel electrode, and provides the solution-phase electron affinity. Ev, is the Fermi level of the substrate (Au here). The corresponding positions in the OMT spectrum are shown by Ar and A0 and correspond to the electron affinity and ionization potential of the adsorbate film modified by interaction with the supporting metal, At. The spectrum is that of nickel(II) tetraphenyl-porphyrin on Au (111). (Reprinted with permission from [26])...

In addition to the enthalpy and polar interaction, the following factors influence the activation energy of these reactions triplet repulsion, electron affinity of atoms C and O in the TS, radii of C and O atoms, and n-bonds in the vicinity of the reaction center. These factors were discussed in Chapter 6 in application to the reaction of peroxyl radicals with hydrocarbons. 

---