Addition reactions facial selectivity

Addition of osmium tetroxide to norbornene 2 followed by reductive cleavage with sodium sulfite gives the exo,exo diol 3. The same reaction sequence carried out on 7,7-dimethylnorbornene 4 gives endo,endo diol 5. From these results deduce the mechanism of the addition and facial selectivity for these two substrates. 

A series of (2+2) photocycloaddition reactions have been carried out using (5R)-5-menthyloxy-2(5H)-furanone (32) as the substrate. Photoaddition of cyclopentenone to this substrate gives the four products (33)-(36) with some level of regioselectivity but no facial selectivity. Interestingly, cyclohexenone, cyclohepten-one and cyclooctenone fail to undergo the mixed addition. High facial selectivity is observed when more complex enones such as the 3,5,5-trimethylcyclohexenone and isophorone, (37) are used. The reaction affords adducts of the type illustrated... 

This reviews contends that, throughout the known examples of facial selections, from classical to recently discovered ones, a key role is played by the unsymmetri-zation of the orbital phase environments of n reaction centers arising from first-order perturbation, that is, the unsymmetrization of the orbital phase environment of the relevant n orbitals. This asymmetry of the n orbitals, if it occurs along the trajectory of addition, is proposed to be generally involved in facial selection in sterically unbiased systems. Experimentally, carbonyl and related olefin compounds, which bear a similar structural motif, exhibit the same facial preference in most cases, particularly in the cases of adamantanes. This feature seems to be compatible with the Cieplak model. However, this is not always the case for other types of molecules, or in reactions such as Diels-Alder cycloaddition. In contrast, unsymmetrization of orbital phase environment, including SOI in Diels-Alder reactions, is a general concept as a contributor to facial selectivity. Other interpretations of facial selectivities have also been reviewed [174-180]. 

Ab initio calculation of Diels-Alder reactions of a series of 5-heteroatom substituted cyclopentadienes Cp-X (65 X = NH, 50 X = NH, 64 X = NH3, 67 X = O", 54 X = OH, 68 X = OH3% 69 X = PH, 51 X = PH, 70 X = PH3% 71 X = S, 55 X = SH, 72 X = SH/) with ethylene at HF/6-31++G(d)//HF/6-31-i i-G(d) level by BumeU and coworkers [37] provided counterexamples of the Cieplak effect. The calculation showed that ionization of substituents has a profound effect on the n facial selectivity deprotonation enhances syn addition and protonation enhances anti addition. The transition states for syn addition to the deprotonated dienes are stabilized relative to those of the neutral dienes, while those for anti addition are destabilized relative to those of the neutral dienes. On the other hand, activation energies for syn addition to the protonated dienes are similar to those of the neutral dienes, but those for anti addition are very much lowered relative to neutral dienes (Table 6). 

Diels-Alder reaction between isodicyclopentadiene 79 and a variety of dienophiles takes place from the bottom [40], This facial selectivity is contrastive with well known exo (top) facial selectivity in the additions to norbomene 80 [41] (Scheme 32). 

In contrast with exo (top) facial selectivity in the additions to norbomene 80 [41], Diels-Alder reaction between isodicyclopentadiene 79 takes place from the bottom [40] (see Scheme 32). To solve this problem, Honk and Brown calculated the transition state of the parent Diels-Alder reaction of butadiene with ethylene [47], They pointed ont that of particular note for isodicyclopentadiene selectivity issue is the 14.9° out-of-plane bending of the hydrogens at C2 and C3 of butadiene. The bending is derived from Cl and C4 pyramidalization and rotation inwardly to achieve overlap of p-orbitals on these carbons with the ethylene termini. To keep the tr-bonding between C1-C2 and C3-C4, the p-orbitals at C2 and C3 rotate inwardly on the side of the diene nearest to ethylene. This is necessarily accompanied by C2 and C3 hydrogen movanent toward the attacking dienophile. They proposed that when norbomene is fused at C2 and C3, the tendency of endo bending of the norbomene framework will be manifested in the preference for bottom attack in Diels-Alder reactions (Schane 38). 

Summary of the Relationship between Diastereoselectivity and the Transition Structure. In this section we considered simple diastereoselection in aldol reactions of ketone enolates. Numerous observations on the reactions of enolates of ketones and related compounds are consistent with the general concept of a chairlike TS.35 These reactions show a consistent E - anti Z - syn relationship. Noncyclic TSs have more variable diastereoselectivity. The prediction or interpretation of the specific ratio of syn and anti product from any given reaction requires assessment of several variables (1) What is the stereochemical composition of the enolate (2) Does the Lewis acid promote tight coordination with both the carbonyl and enolate oxygen atoms and thereby favor a cyclic TS (3) Does the TS have a chairlike conformation (4) Are there additional Lewis base coordination sites in either reactant that can lead to reaction through a chelated TS Another factor comes into play if either the aldehyde or the enolate, or both, are chiral. In that case, facial selectivity becomes an issue and this is considered in Section 2.1.5. 

Among the most useful carbonyl derivatives are (V-acyloxazolidinones, and as we shall see in Section 2.3.4, they provide facial selectivity in aldol addition reactions. l,3-Thiazoline-2-thiones constitute another useful type of chiral auxiliary, and they can be used in conjunction with Bu2B03SCF3,44 Sn(03SCF3)2,45 or TiCl446 for generation of enolates. The stereoselectivity of the reactions is consistent with formation of a Z-enolate and reaction through a cyclic TS. 

In the discussion of the stereochemistry of aldol and Mukaiyama reactions, the most important factors in determining the syn or anti diastereoselectivity were identified as the nature of the TS (cyclic, open, or chelated) and the configuration (E or Z) of the enolate. If either the aldehyde or enolate is chiral, an additional factor enters the picture. The aldehyde or enolate then has two nonidentical faces and the stereochemical outcome will depend on facial selectivity. In principle, this applies to any stereocenter in the molecule, but the strongest and most studied effects are those of a- and (3-substituents. If the aldehyde is chiral, particularly when the stereogenic center is adjacent to the carbonyl group, the competition between the two diastereotopic faces of the carbonyl group determines the stereochemical outcome of the reaction. 

The stereogenic centers may be integral parts of the reactants, but chiral auxiliaries can also be used to impart facial diastereoselectivity and permit eventual isolation of enantiomerically enriched product. Alternatively, use of chiral Lewis acids as catalysts can also achieve facial selectivity. Although the general principles of control of the stereochemistry of aldol addition reactions have been well developed for simple molecules, the application of the principles to more complex molecules and the... 

Stereochemical Control by the Enolate or Enolate Equivalent. The facial selectivity of aldol addition reactions can also be controlled by stereogenic centers in the nucleophile. A stereocenter can be located at any of the adjacent positions on an enolate or enolate equivalent. The configuration of the substituent can influence the direction of approach of the aldehyde. 

Scheme 2.5 gives some additional examples of double stereodifferentiation. Entry 1 combines the steric (Felkin) facial selectivity of the aldehyde with the facial selectivity of the enolate, which is derived from chelation. In reaction with the racemic aldehyde, the (R)-enantiomer is preferred. 

Summary of Facial Stereoselectivity in Aldol and Mukaiyama Reactions. The examples provided in this section show that there are several approaches to controlling the facial selectivity of aldol additions and related reactions. The E- or Z-configuration of the enolate and the open, cyclic, or chelated nature of the TS are the departure points for prediction and analysis of stereoselectivity. The Lewis acid catalyst and the donor strength of potentially chelating ligands affect the structure of the TS. Whereas dialkyl boron enolates and BF3 complexes are tetracoordinate, titanium and tin can be... 

Control of Facial Selectivity in Conjugate Addition Reactions... 

Scheme 6.1 gives some additional examples of application of thermal D-A reactions in syntheses. The reaction in Entry 1 was eventually used to construct an aromatic ring by decarboxylation and aromatization. The reaction did not exhibit much facial selectivity, but this was irrelevant for the particular application. Entry... 

In Entry 11 the dienophile is an a-methylene lactam. As noted for this class of dienophiles, the stereoselectivity results from preferred exo addition (see p. 471). The reaction in Entry 12 was used in an enantiospecific synthesis of estrone. The dienophile was used in enantiomerically pure form and the dioxolane ring imparts a high facial selectivity to the dienophile. The reaction occurs through an endo TS. 

Kitamura and Noyori have reported mechanistic studies on the highly diastere-omeric dialkylzinc addition to aryl aldehydes in the presence of (-)-i-exo-(dimethylamino)isoborneol (DAIB) [33]. They stated that DAIB (a chiral (i-amino alcohol) formed a dimeric complex 57 with dialkylzinc. The dimeric complex is not reactive toward aldehydes but a monomeric complex 58, which exists through equilibrium with the dimer 57, reacts with aldehydes via bimetallic complex 59. The initially formed adduct 60 is transformed into tetramer 61 by reaction with either dialkylzinc or aldehydes and regenerates active intermediates. The high enantiomeric excess is attributed to the facial selectivity achieved by clear steric differentiation of complex 59, as shown in Scheme 1.22. 

A wide range of catalysts is now known that will bring about B H addition to simple terminal alkenes. For group 9 complexes, catalytic activity follows the order [(dppe)Rh (nbd)]+ > [Rh(PPh3)3Cl] > [(COD)Ir(PCy3)(C5H5N)]+ (where dppe = 2-bis(diphenylphosphino) ethane and nbd = norbornadiene).19 Different facial selectivity is found for catalytic hydroboration reactions of these compounds with chiral alkenes (Equation (1)). Thus, [(dppe)Rh(nbd)]+ gives... 

In a related publication, Kobayashi and his team reported on Zr-catalyzed asymmetric Mannich reactions that utilize the more electron-rich oxygenated ketene acetals shown in Scheme 6.28 [93], A noteworthy aspect of this study was that the levels of syn/anti diaste-reocontrol proved to be dependent on the nature of the alkoxide substituent whereas the (3-TBS acetals predominantly afforded the syn isomer, the OBn derivatives afforded a larger amount of the anti isomer. As before, the presence of an additive, this time 1,2-dimeth-ylimidazole (DMI), proved to be important with regard to the level of Ti-facial selectivity. The phenol activating group can be removed by the same procedure as reported previously, with essentially identical degrees of efficiency (see Scheme 6.27). 

The glycals are easily converted into the 1,2-dihalo-derivatives, which in principle can act as glycosyl donors. However, these derivatives have not found wide application in glycoside synthesis, mainly because of the low facial selectivity in the initial addition of the electrophilic species [143-145]. In an example of a successful application, 2-deoxy-2-bromo-a-D-glucopyranosyl bromide [146] has been shown to give predominantly the 2-deoxy-P-D-glucopyranosides in silver-triflate-promoted reactions with alcohols. 

Aratani et al. (21) subsequently found that the use of chiral menthyl diazoacetate esters led to higher trans/cis ratios and improved facial selectivity. A number of bulky diazoesters provided high enantioselectivity in the cyclopropanation reaction, but trans selectivity was highest with /-menthyl esters, Eq. 6. It seems clear from these and subsequent studies that the menthyl group is used because of its bulk and ready availability. The chirality present in the ester has a negligible effect on facial selectivity in the cyclopropanation reaction. Slow addition of diazoester is required (7 h at ambient temperature) for high yields presumably to suppress the formation of fumarate byproducts. 

---