Acid-base strength thermodynamic measurement

By measuring the position of the equilibrium, the relative strengths of acids and bases can be determined and a sequence of acid-base strengths can be established. Such measurements give the so-called thermodynamic acidity. Acid strengths (relative to water) of some important acids are presented in Table 1 with their pl a values listing the acids in decreasing order of acidity (7). 

The thermodynamic and analytical aspects of acid-base reactions in aprotic solvents are surveyed in reviews by Davis [1, 2]. The correlation of acid-base strength in water and aprotic solvents is of major importance. Early kinetic work by Bell and co-workers on the acid catalysis of (i) the ethyldiazoacetate-phenol interaction [3] (ii) the rearrangement of N-bromoacetanilide [4] and (iii) the inversion of /-menthone [5] established an order of acid strengths in aprotic media and the importance of intra-molecular hydrogen bonds e.g in picric acid). A thermodynamic method using reference acids and bases is more direct, and Bell and Bayles [6] employed the indicator acid Bromophenol Blue to obtain a basicity order for weak amine bases. Kinetic measurements on these systems have recently been made, and are considered in detail in Section 7. 

Directions for Future Work. The measurement of rates of proton transfer from a single acid to more bases differing only in thermodynamic base strength should allow the construction of BrjSnsted plots of kinetic versus thermodynamic acidity. The bases we have used at this early stage of development of the subject have involved different proton acceptor atoms and cannot be so used (although comparison of the Et N transfer rates of... 

The thermodynamic tendency of a substance to act as a Lewis acid. The strength of a Lewis acid depends on the nature of the base with which the Lewis acid forms a Lewis adduct. Hence, comparative measures of Lewis acidities are given by equilibrium constants for the formation of the adducts by a common reference base. See Lewis Acid Electrophilicity Hard Acids Soft Acids Acceptor Number... 

Since solid acid catalysts are used extensively in chemical industry, particularly in the petroleum field, a reliable method for measuring the acidity of solids would be extremely useful. The main difficulty to start with is that the activity coefficients for solid species are unknown and thus no thermodynamic acidity function can be properly defined. On the other hand, because the solid by definition is heterogeneous, acidic and basic sites can coexist with variable strength. The surface area available for colorimetric determinations may have widely different acidic properties from the bulk material this is especially true for well-structured solids like zeolites. It is also not possible to establish a true acid-base equilibrium. 

Overall the polymers investigated were predominantly basic since they interacted most strongly with the acidic probes. Nitromethane, which is slightly basic but has the same acid strength as methylene chloride, had an enthalpy of interaction lower than that for the methylene chloride. This indicated that the basicity of nitromethane resulted in a less favorable interaction with the basic polymer surfaces. The non-dispersive interactions were not determined for polyetherimide since all of these probes resulted in nonsymetric, tailing peaks. Perhaps the polyetherimide is quite a strong base and attracted the acidic probes sufficiently to prevent equilibrium thermodynamic measurements. 

If an acid is added to water, Eq. 5.5 describes the reaction, because the base in solution is water. Further, if a base is added to water, Eq. 5.6 describes the reaction, because now water is the acid. These acid-base reactions are critical to life itself, since nature s solvent is water. Having a good understanding of the thermodynamics of these reactions is not only important for understanding organic reactions in water, but is of the upper most importance in understanding biochemical reactions, almost all of which have acid-base dependencies. The factors that control the thermodynamics of acid-base reactions are the strengths of the acids or bases and the pH of the solution, so these measurements of acidity need to be examined in detail. 

The small difference between the successive pK values (cf. values below) of tungstic acid was previously explained in terms of an anomalously high value for the first protonation constant, assumed to be effected by an increase in the coordination number of tungsten in the first protonation step (2, 3, 55). As shown by the values of the thermodynamic parameters for the protonation of molybdate it is actually the second protonation constant which has an abnormally high value (54, 58). An equilibrium constant and thermodynamic quantities calculated for the first protonation of [WO, - pertaining to 25°C and zero ionic strength (based on measurements from 95° to 300°C), namely log K = 3.62 0.53, AH = 6 13 kJ/mol, and AS = 90 33 J, are also consistent with a normal first protonation (131) (cf. values for molydate, Table V). 

The p/<, of a base is actually that of its conjugate acid. As the numeric value of the dissociation constant increases (i.e., pKa decreases), the acid strength increases. Conversely, as the acid dissociation constant of a base (that of its conjugate acid) increases, the strength of the base decreases. For a more accurate definition of dissociation constants, each concentration term must be replaced by thermodynamic activity. In dilute solutions, concentration of each species is taken to be equal to activity. Activity-based dissociation constants are true equilibrium constants and depend only on temperature. Dissociation constants measured by spectroscopy are concentration dissociation constants." Most piCa values in the pharmaceutical literature are measured by ignoring activity effects and therefore are actually concentration dissociation constants or apparent dissociation constants. It is customary to report dissociation constant values at 25°C. 

These methods suffer from the lack of complementarity, and thus the significance of results provided by any of them is limited. A standard practice to detect the Bronsted or Lewis character of surface sites is pyridine adsorption combined with FTIR measurements the number of Lewis or Bronsted sites is more difficult to count, however. Other titration methods use either color indicators and acid or base titrants in nonpolar solvents or the adsorption of gaseous acidic or basic probes. They do not, in general, give consistent quantitative information about the number of acid or base sites even when applied to the same sample. There are several reasons the applicability of titration methods is limited Either the state of the surface is different for different methods or adsorption equilibrium is not always achieved. Another more serious source of discrepancies between titration methods is that probe molecules of different basicities "see" different surface sites. The lack of a uniquely defined thermodynamic scale of acid strength of surface sites makes difficult any correlation between results obtained with different probe molecules. The use of standard catalytic tests for probing the so-called catalytic acidity is not always a better approach, because the mechanistic assumptions involved are neither straightforward nor subject to experimental proof. 

When measuring the strength of a solid acid or base, it should be recognized that activity coefficients for species on the solid are unknown. Therefore, acidity and basicity functions for the solid are not properly defined thermodynamically. Nevertheless, the acidity and basicity functions are clearly valuable in a relative sense, while the absolute values are also useful provided the above limitations are recognized and numerical accuracy is not overstated. 

QM calculations (on nucieobase dimers) reveal the binding energy between two bases in the gas phase, i.e., in complete isolation. They thus describe the intrinsic interactions of the systems with no perturbation by external effects such as solvent. The intrinsic intermolecular stabilities are directly linked to moiecuiar structures and can be derived in any selected geometry. However, the gas phase interaction energies do not correspond to the stability of the interactions in nucleic acids, as measured by thermodynamics experiments. It is not possible to easily correlate the QM calculations with measured base pairing and stacking stabilities in nucleic acids. The apparent (measured) strength of the base-base interactions in nucleic acids in various experiments is determined by a complex interplay of many factors and the intrinsic base-base term is only one of them. Many researchers incorrectly believe that the experiments reflect the true stabilities of base-base interactions and vice versa. 

The terms Ca and Ct are defined by equations (3 9a) and (3-9) respectively. The hydrogen and hydroxyl ion activity terms have been placed in the equation to emphasize that these are assumed to be the measured quantities derived from the pH measurements. Whilst it is correct to use the hydrogen ion activity in equation (3-22), the hydrogen ion concentration is required for equation (3-22a). It is apparent, therefore that mixed constants would result from the solution of equation (3 -22). A further complication is the ionic strength which, in this case, cannot be calculated directly from the stoicheiometric concentration used, for example, in equation (3-19). To obtain the thermodynamic values, K and KI, the activity functions must be calculated from estimates of the ionic strength. How this can be achieved will now be described for dibasic acids followed by a similar method for ampholytes and diacidic bases. 

---