Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

About the Model Parameters

Another approach is to develop a global model that contains plausible models as special cases, defined by alternative values of particular parameters. This converts model uncertainty into uncertainty about the model parameters. Again this can be done using either Bayesian or non-Bayesian approaches. This approach is favored by Morgan and Henrion (1990), who describe how it can be applied to uncertainty about dose-response functions (threshold versus nonthreshold, linear versus exponential). [Pg.26]

With linear models, exact inferential procedures are available for any sample size. The reason is that as a result of the linearity of the model parameters, the parameter estimates are unbiased with minimum variance when the assumption of independent, normally distributed residuals with constant variance holds. The same is not true with nonlinear models because even if the residuals assumption is true, the parameter estimates do not necessarily have minimum variance or are unbiased. Thus, inferences about the model parameter estimates are usually based on large sample sizes because the properties of these estimators are asymptotic, i.e., are true as n —> oo. Thus, when n is large and the residuals assumption is true, only then will nonlinear regression parameter estimates have estimates that are normally distributed and almost unbiased with minimum variance. As n increases, the degree of unbiasedness and estimation variability will increase. [Pg.104]

In cases where the pharmacokineticist has input on when samples can be collected, samples should be obtained at times that maximize the pharmacokinetic information about the model parameters while collecting as few as samples as possible. This section will focus on the experimental design considerations to maxi-... [Pg.290]

The design allows checking the reliabihty of the model fitted to the data, typically by statistical tests about the model parameters and the model adequacy (lack-of-fit), and by cross validation. [Pg.100]

Since the prior variances will always be greater than the posterior variances if the data provide any information about the model parameters in the model class Cj, all the terms in the first summation in Equation (6.15) will be positive and so will the terms in the second summation unless the posterior most probable value 6 just happens to coincide with the prior most probable value O . Thus, one might expect that the log-Ockham factor In Oj will decrease if the number of parameters Nj for the model class Cj is increased. This expectation is confirmed by noting that the posterior variances are inversely proportional to the number of data points N in V, so the dependence of the log-Ockham factor is ... [Pg.222]

A comparison of this equation and Equation (6.11) shows that the Ockham factor is approximately equal to the ratio p 9 Cj)/p 9 VXj) which is always less than unity if the data provide any information about the model parameters in the model class Cj. Indeed, for large N, the negative logarithm of this ratio is an asymptotic approximation of the information about 0 provided by data V [147]. Therefore, the log-Ockham factor In Oj removes the amount of information about 9 provided by T> from the log-likelihood In p T> 9, Cj) to give the log-evidence, In p(V Cj). [Pg.223]

The semibatch model GASPP is consistent with most of the data published by Wisseroth on gas phase propylene polymerization. The data are too scattered to make quantitative statements about the model discrepancies. There are essentially three catalysts used in his tests. These BASF catalysts are characterized by the parameters listed in Table I. The high solubles for BASF are expected at 80 C and without modifiers in the recipe. The fact that the BASF catalyst parameters are so similar to those evaluated earlier in slurry systems lends credence to the kinetic model. [Pg.211]

Computer simulations have been useful for validating a kinetic model that Is not easily tested. The model was equally capable of describing multi-site polymerizations which can undergo either first or second order deactivation. The model parameters provided reasonably accurate kinetic information about the Initial active site distribution. Simulation results were also used as aids for Interpretation of experimental data with encouraging results. [Pg.413]

A series of rules describing the breaking, / B,and joining, J, probabilities must be selected to operate the cellular automata model. The study of Kier was driven by the rules shown in Table 6.6, where Si and S2 are the two solutes, B, the stationary cells, and W, the solvent (water). The boundary cells, E, of the grid are parameterized to be noninteractive with the water and solutes, i.e., / b(WE) = F b(SE) = 1.0 and J(WE) = J(SE) = 0. The information about the gravity parameters is found in Chapter 2. The characteristics of Si, S2, and B relative to each other and to water, W, can be interpreted from the entries in Table 6.6. [Pg.96]

Measurement—Much uncertainty about release rates could be reduced by markedly increasing the number and variety of measurements made. Releases during use, if not clearly 100% of use or nearly so, are especially needed. We can clearly use many more model-measurement comparisons to calibrate our source term assumptions, as well as the model parameters. [Pg.23]

Parameters subject to calibration within SWAT were selected after a preliminary sensitivity analysis and literature review, to partially compensate for the inadequacy of the initial values assumed for some of them (especially those related to soil type), model structure and other sources of uncertainty. A detailed description about the SWAT parameters can be found in [5, 6], while a brief description of the selected parameters is provided next ... [Pg.65]

Figure 6.19 shows the concentration profiles of O2, Fe +,NH4+ and N03 near a root calculated with this model for realistic flooded soil conditions and realistic rates of O2 release (last section) Figure 6.20 shows the corresponding fluxes of O2 out of the root and NH4+ and NO3 in. The amount of N denitrified in 10 days in the calculations corresponds to about 10% of the NH4+ initially in the volume of soil influenced by the root. This is of the order of maximum rates of denitrification reported in the literature for rice in flooded soil, indicating that the model parameter values are indeed realistic. [Pg.196]

This screen gives all of the model parameters for the 2n3904 model. To distinguish the new model we are about to create from the original model, we will rename the model to Q2N3904-X. This new model will be saved in file SECTION 7AJI0. [Pg.439]

In the literature, QPPRs are represented with varying details about the model derivation process. Statistical parameters, training and evaluation set information, and specification of the applicability range differ from publication to publication. Although guidelines for the application of QPPRs and QSPRs have been proposed [26], they are not always followed consistently. In this book, QPPRs are presented in the following form ... [Pg.12]

For thin film samples the analysis of the RBS spectra is generally straightforward, especially when the peaks are well separated. For bulk samples and samples with layers of different compositions the spectrum will be a complicated sum of the individual element spectra. For analysis, a model spectrum is generated based on assumptions about the elemental composition and element distribution in the sample. The model parameters are (manually or by a minimisation routine) adjusted until a satisfactory agreement with the measured spectrum is obtained. [Pg.90]

In order to correlate the results obtained, a modified SRK equation of state with Huron-Vidal mixing rules was used. Details about the model are reported in the paper by Soave et al. [16]. This approach is particularly adequated when experimental values of the critical temperature and pressure are not available as it was the case for limonene and linalool. Note that the flexibility of the thermodynamic model to reproduce high-pressure vapor-liquid equilibrium data is ensured by the use of the Huron-Vidal mixing rules and a NRTL activity coefficient model at infinite pressures. Calculation results are reported as continuous curves in figure 2 for the C02-linalool system and in figure 3 for C02-limonene. Note that the same parameters values were used to correlated the data of C02-limonene at 45, 50 e 60 °C. [Pg.415]

If the data contain enough evidence to reliably extract all of the model parameters, then (6.40b) and (6.40c) can be used to estimate the mechanical and chemical rate constants, the reaction temperature, and the rate ratio at each operating point. Figure 6.6 shows the extracted rate information for the current example, and Fig. 6.4(b) shows the reaction temperature. The mechanical rate increases nearly linearly with pV, deviations from perfect linearity being due to fluctuations in the COF. Similarly, the chemical rate generally increases with pV but drops when an increase in velocity decreases the fraction of heat transferred to the pad asperities. The process has about equal chemical and mechanical rate constants at low frictional power density but becomes more chemically limited as the power density increases. Since ki and the rate ratio are not functions of pV alone, it is sometimes more illuminating to display them using a contour plot similar to the one in Fig. 6.5. [Pg.189]

The user must pre-inquire about the basic parameters of microwave apparatus being used, which may include the model no., year of manufacturing, serial no.,... [Pg.6]

A great future challenge for modeling the Baltic Sea ecosystem is related to the task of conceptual and numerical ecosystem model formulation. Before a numerical ecosystem model can be implemented and simulations are carried out, a conceptual view on the ecosystem must be developed and formulated. This includes the determination of the major links in the biogeochemical cycles, identification of the leading players in these cycles, and to find estimates for their activity in the transport and transformation of matter. This requires accomplishing the difficult task of a far-reaching simplification of a complex conceptual ecosystem model, the formulation as mathematical equations and the numerical implementation of suitable solution methods. Little is known about many model parameters. [Pg.617]

In order to obtain information about the binding parameter for the intercalation process, the absorption spectra of solutions containing a constant concentration of PF and varing amounts of DNA were measured by using a spectrophotometer (Perkin-Elmer, Model 552). [Pg.178]


See other pages where About the Model Parameters is mentioned: [Pg.704]    [Pg.448]    [Pg.704]    [Pg.448]    [Pg.887]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.394]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.231]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.159]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.795]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.2115]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.349]    [Pg.2423]    [Pg.314]   


SEARCH



Model parameter

The parameters

© 2024 chempedia.info