Abbreviated reviews

H25. Hinshaw, L. B., Sepsis/septic shock Participation of the microcirculation An abbreviated review. Crit. Care Med. 24, 1072-1078 (1996). 

As this abbreviated review has indicated there is no universally accepted interpretation of Cl shifts in iron compounds, and most of the empirical correlations that have been found are limited to either one spin state, or to one or two valence states. In most cases it is clear that the failure to find extended agreement between data and theory is because the theory has been forced to a limit where its approximations are no longer valid. Probably the main reason for the limited success of empirical correlations—e.g., the Cl shift with the nepheleuxetic and spectrochemical series or with electronegativity differences—is that the Cl shift depends on electron density distributions while the other quantities by-and-large depend on, or are measures of, electronic energy level differences. Since there is usually no simple relationship between the two quantities, the limited agreement is not surprising. It is clear that the... 

EPA s review process will include some or all of the elements described in the following paragraphs and depicted in Figure 1. As the Agency builds a baseline of risk assessment data atxi gains more experience in evaluating these products, certain steps may no longer be necessary. In certain cases, an abbreviated review process may be appropriate (e.q., review of a proposal that is similar to an already reviewed case). Such a determination will be made on a case-by-case basis. 

The function of this chapter is to review these methods with emphasis on the types of phenomenology involved and information obtained. Many of the effects are complicated, and full theoretical descriptions are still lacking. The wide variety of methods and derivative techniques has resulted in a veritable alphabet soup of acronyms. A short list is given in Table VIII-1 (see pp. 313-318) the lUPAC recommendations for the abbreviations are found in Ref. 1. 

Bioinformatics is a relatively new discipline that is concerned with the collection, organisatic and analysis of biological data. It is beyond our scope to provide a comprehensive overvie of this discipline a few textbooks and reviews that serve this purpose are now available (s the suggestions for further reading). However, we will discuss some of the main rnethoc that are particularly useful when trying to predict the three-dimensional structure and fum tion of a protein. To help with this. Appendix 10.1 contains a limited selection of some of tf common abbreviations and acronyms used in bioinformatics and Appendix 10.2 lists sorr of the most widely used databases and other resources. 

Our reviewer felt the molecule builder was easy to use. It is set up for organic molecules. Specialized building modes are available for peptides, nucleotides, and carbohydrates. It is also possible to impose constraints on the molecular geometry. Functions are accessed via a separate window with buttons labeled with abbreviated names. This layout is convenient to use, but not completely self-explanatory. The program is capable of good-quality rendering. At the time of this book s publication, a new three-dimensional graphic user interface called Maestro was under development. 

Note this is the same derivation that yields the important results V = (3G/3p)y and S = (3G/3T)p when no elastic work is considered. It would be inappropriate for a book like this to digress into thermodynamics any further than this. The two relationships cited above are derived in almost every thermodynamics text the student is advised to consult a suitable reference and review this material if the treatment above is too abbreviated. 

Catalysis. Kistler explored the catalytic appHcations of aerogels ia the 1930s because of the unique pore characteristics of aerogels (24), but this area of research stayed dormant for about three decades until less tedious procedures to produce the materials were introduced (25,26). Three recent review articles summarize the flurry of research activities since then (63—65). Table 3 is a much abbreviated Hst of what has been cited in these three articles to demonstrate simply the wide range of catalytic materials and reactions that have been studied. 

Poly(viaylidene fluoride) [24937-79-9] is the addition polymer of 1,1-difluoroethene [73-38-7], commonly known as vinylidene fluoride and abbreviated VDF or VF2. The formula of the repeat unit in the polymer is —CH2—CF2—. The preferred acronym for the polymer is PVDF, but the abbreviation PVF2 is also frequently used. The history and development of poly(vinyhdene fluoride) technology has been reviewed (1 3). 

Microscopy is an unusual scientific discipline, involving as it does a wide variety of microscopes and techniques. All have in common the abiUty to image and enlarge tiny objects to macroscopic size for study, comparison, evaluation, and identification. Few industries or research laboratories can afford to ignore microscopy, although each may use only a small fraction of the various types. Microscopy review articles appear every two years m. Jinalytical Chemistty (1,2). Whereas the style of the Enclyclopedia employs lower case abbreviations for analytical techniques and instmments, eg, sem for scanning electron microscope, in this article capital letters will be used, eg, SEM. 

For dmgs approved originally between 1938 and 1962, the FDA has utilized the Abbreviated New Dmg AppHcation (ANDA) for review of generic products that are pharmaceutical equivalents of the initially approved products. In this way, costiy dupHcation of animal and human experimentation is avoided. The new manufacturer has to show only that its manufacturing methodology, specifications, quaUty control, and labeling are acceptable. In some cases, the FDA does require proof of bioequivalence. 

Poly(propylene oxide) [25322-69-4] may be abbreviated PPO and copolymers of PO and ethylene oxide (EO) are referred to as EOPO. Diol poly(propylene oxide) is commonly referred to by the common name poly(propylene glycol) (PPG). Propylene oxide [75-56-9] and poly(propylene oxide) and its copolymers, with ethylene oxide, have by far the largest volume and importance in the polyurethane (PUR) and surfactant industry compared to all other polyepoxides. Articles reviewing propylene oxide (1), poly(propylene oxide) (2—4), other poly(aIkylene oxides) (4), and polyurethanes (5—7) are cited to lead the interested reader to additional detail not in the scope of this article. 

Table 1 Hsts a number of chelating agents, grouped according to recognized stmctural classes. Because systematic nomenclature of chelating agents is frequently cumbersome, chelants are commonly referred to by common names and abbreviations. For the macrocyclic complexing agents, special systems of abbreviated nomenclature have been devised and are widely used. Some of the donor atoms involved ia chelation and the many forms ia which they can occur have been reviewed (5).

To use the volume effectively, the reader should first review the Glossary of Terms section immediately preceding the first chemical entry. This section contains precise definitions used for certain parameters where data have been obtained for each chemical. A review of these terms will help the reader interpret certain information. In addition, a list of abbreviations used throughout the volume is also provided in the front section of the handbook. 

The FDA are allowed 90 days to review a Traditional or Abbreviated 510(k) notification, and just 30 days for a Special 510(k). With the introduction of the Medical Device User Fee and Modernization Act of2002, provision was made for the participation of third-party organisations in the review process. This represents a partial adoption of the concept of Notified Bodies, which prevails in Europe. The FDA have accredited a number of commercial organisations to conduct primary 510(k) reviews of670 types of device. The FDA must then give a final determination within 30 days of receipt of the recommendation of a third-party reviewer. Because they are commercial, third-party reviewers will seek to offer faster review times in return for their review fee. If using a third-party reviewer, the FDA user fee does not apply. The outcome of a successful 510(k) notification is a letter from the FDA clearing the device for commercial sale. 

Recent work on thermoplastic vulcanizates (TPVs) will not be included in this chapter since it is being reviewed elsewhere in the book. Abbreviations for some mbbers and accelerators will be used throughout in place of their full names as shown in Table 11.1. Acronyms for other polymers and additives wUl be provided in the text as required. A short discussion of polymer miscibility and compatibUization of polymer blends will be provided for better appreciation of the subject. 

---