Abatement equipment

Prescriibbing (vessel containing scrubber solution between vacuum source and batch vessel). High concentration of off-gases resulting in overpowering abatement equipment. 

It has been proposed that a set of scheduled works may be assigned to local authorities. This class of works has been discussed in documents published by the Department of the Environment Air Quality Division and legislation came into force on 1 April 1991. It is proposed that these schedule (B) works will be licensed in much the same way as the existing scheduled works and that prior consent will be needed before operations of this type commence. This will give local authorities a much stronger hand in pollution abatement, and they will be able to avoid the establishment of premises in unsuitable areas or without adequate pollution-abatement equipment. At present, local authorities rely on planning conditions or nuisance provisions. 

The composition of trace element emissions during coal combustion is described by Bolton et al. in Chapter 13. The actual quantities are somewhat variable depending upon the coal source, the combustion process, the pollution abatement equipment, and the assay itself. Much less is known about important local concentrations of emissions in and around the source, their chemical and physical characteristics, and their fate in the environment. 

Emissions from the prilling and granulation sections of AN and CAN plants can be treated by a range of abatement equipment. Particulate material from some granulation plants is relatively coarse in particle size, whereas the prill tower emissions contain very fine particles. Candle filters are normally required for a prill tower emission. They can abate particulate emissions down to 15 mg/m3 of air. For coarser material dry devices such as bag filters or dry cyclones are used. Particulate emissions can be of higher concentration, perhaps up to 30 to 50 mg/m3, but the recovered material is a solid that can more readily be recycled to the process. 

Recent tests provide an excellent example of the control of PCDD/F emissions from MSW combustion facilities.46 Tables 4 and 5 reproduce the results of a multiple regression analysis on operating variables relevant to the combustion system (i.e. before the combustion gases enter the pollution abatement equipment). 

GCP alone will permit consistent achievement of PCDD/F emissions of 0.5-10 ng I-TEQ m 3, as confirmed by the NITEP trials on the modified Quebec Urban Community MSW incinerator. Maintenance of GCP and operation of the pollution abatement equipment below 200 °C will help achieve further reductions to 0.1 ng I-TEQ m 3 and below. Catalytic oxidation or treatment with activated carbon enables the emission range to be maintained below 0.1 ng I-TEQ m-3 with greater consistency. 

More specifically, a 1000-MWe coal plant with optimal pollution abatement equipment will annually emit into the atmosphere 900 tonnes of SOj, 4500 tonnes of NO,j, 1300 tonnes of particulates, and 6.5 million tonnes of CO2. Depending on the quality of the coal, up to 1 million tonnes of ashes containing hundreds of tonnes of toxic heavy metals (arsenic, cadmium, lead, and mercury) will have to be disposed of. 

The cost of the pollution abatement equipment already installed in DuPont s plants totaled 14,808,000. But this fell far short of what was needed—the Engineering Department s rough estimate of the expenditure needed to comply with the intent of the laws on stream and atmospheric pollution was an additional 20,500,000. The reason that achievement fell so far short was stated with clarity ... 

Fixed auxiliary equipment for general purpose stirred vessels (sized accordingly) condensers, decanters, receivers, weighing tanks, solids charging devices, sampling devices, pumps and piping, connectivity to the tank farm and to pollution abatement equipment, connectivity among each other, vacuum sources, vent trim condensers, overhead catch tanks, in-line filters, flow splitters, etc. 

A cost estimate for an extreme (worst case) scenario, i.e. needing to capture all the dusts from charging and tapping, was made by CTI. Table 4.45 summarises this financial data for an average foundry with the costs depreciated over a presumed 10 year lifespan of the extraction and abatement equipment. This estimation however, can broadly vary, depending on the foundry layout and the techniques used. 

The table below summarises the financial data for an average foundry , with the costs amortised over the presumed 10 year lifespan of the extraction and abatement equipment. 

Another potential environmental risk aspect is that pollution-abatement equipment such as pumps and filters often depend on electricity. Power outages might hence have environmental effects. 

The cost of pollution abatement equipment added to the existing plants can be 10%-20% of the total cost of the fertilizer plants. The operating and maintenance costs relating to environmental protection can be 10%-20% of the total production cost. 

Papasavva et al. [36] showed diagrams of auto paint lines that indicated abatement on the solvent-borne primer/surfacer ovens, on the heated flashed zone after waterborne basecoat application, and on the solvent-bome clearcoat oven. The abatement equipment included a carbon concentrator, which is likely a device for solvent vapor adsorption on activated carbon. A collection efficiency of 90% was reported. The abatement equipment also included a system for oxidizing the vapors to form water and carbon dioxide. These units were called reactive thermal oxidizers (RTOs) [36], and their destruction efficiency was reported to be 95%. For the various scenarios discussed in Section 6.7.2, the abatement efficiencies were reported to range from 52.3 to 62.5%. Emissions from powder coatings ovens are expected to be so low that abatement is not needed, and calculations with and without powder coating oven abatement gave the same results for VOC emission [36]. 

The main aims of environmental protection are to prevent the pollution in the first instance or to reduce the pollution at source before an environmental effect occurs. If, having taken all steps to reduce pollution at source and still not achieving the target levels, it may be necessary to employ end of pipe techniques as well. Such technologies do not result in an intrinsically cleaner process, but rather reduce to an acceptable level the emissions to atmosphere from the process. There are a number of different types of abatement equipment available on the market, and their application to a specific process is a matter for advice from an expert consultant or contracting company. Such abatement equipment includes ... 

VOC-removal efficiencies as high as 95 percent have been achieved with biofilters. Biofilters typically have low operating costs with minimal emissions of other pollutants, such as NOx and CO. However, space requirements are higher and capital costs are moderate to higher compared to other VOC-abatement equipment. A number of factors must be considered in selection of a biofilter, including the following ... 

---