Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Yield value static

These could consist of a whole range of Mo(VI) and Mo(IV) mixed oxygen/ sulfur compounds. There is no evidence for the presence of MoOi, except in one case. Simulation of the static powder lineshapes allowed the deconvolution of the various components, thus yielding values of quadrupole parameters as well as relative intensity data. From the spikelet experiments it was ascertained that all species are present as both static adsorbed and dynamically active phases. The Mo spectrum of the used catalyst shows the presence of the tetrahedral molybdenum-oxo species, along with a much reduced MoSt resonance (relative to the fresh system), perhaps suggesting that MoSt is the active site in the... [Pg.281]

The data thus obtained fit those reported by Summers et al. [22] and those yielded by static methods [84] (Table 5.6). One can conclude that in the absence of support or surface effects the gas chromatographic method produces sufficiently precise data for the thermodynamic properties of polymer solutions. The differences between "yj and Xi2 values given by static methods and GLC with dimethylsiloxanes as solvents stem from experimental skills rather than principle [11]. [Pg.144]

Flow. The approach given in eqs. (13-34) to (13-36) may be used to compute the yield values for a static mixer reactor. Following Baldyga et al. (1997), the pipe radius divided by 2 was assumed as an approximation of the mixing scale, Ls. The method may easily be modified to compute conversions and yields as a function of distance downstream for any turbulent plug flow reactor and set of chemical reactions if realistic feed conditions can be given. [Pg.841]

In contrast to the static elongation, the creep strain is time dependent. The standard creep test is to apply a stress constant with time and measure the resulting creep strain as a function of time as shown in Figure 2.7. If no plastic strains occur (the stress applied o is less than a yield value which may be less than S y), the material is said to be viscoelastic and the total strain can be represented as... [Pg.38]

It has been a persistent characteristic of shock-compression science that the first-order picture of the processes yields readily to solution whereas second-order descriptions fail to confirm material models. For example, the high-pressure, pressure-volume relations and equation-of-state data yield pressure values close to that expected at a given volume compression. Mechanical yielding behavior is observed to follow behaviors that can be modeled on concepts developed to describe solids under less severe loadings. Phase transformations are observed to occur at pressures reasonably close to those obtained in static compression. [Pg.51]

In this case, each site can have many identical outputs but receives only a single input. There are four possible Boolean functions with one input two yield fixed values of 0 or 1, independent of input (these two static functions, and Fi are always among the 2 possible Boolean functions), the third inverts the input T = —) and the fourth is the identity = +). We will discuss behavior arising only ft om the latter two active functions. Exact results for the analytically tractable case of allowing a distribution of all four Boolean functions have been derived by Flyvbjerg and Kjaer [flyvb88]. [Pg.430]

The conhned liquid is found to exhibit both viscous and elastic response, which demonstrates that a transition from the liquid to solid state may occur in thin hlms. The solidihed liquid in the him deforms under shear, and hnally yields when the shear stress exceeds a critical value, which results in the static friction force required to initiate the motion. [Pg.18]

There is evidence to suggest that the yield stress of thin hlms grows with the time of experiments, over a remarkably long duration—minutes to hours, depending on the liquid involved. Figure 9 gives the critical shear stress of OMCTS, measured by Alsten and Granick [26], as a function of experiment time. The yield stress on the hrst measurement was 3.5 MPa, comparable to the result presented in Ref. [8], but this value nearly tripled over a 10-min interval and then became stabilized as the time went on. This observation provides a possible explanation for the phenomenon that static friction increases with contact time. [Pg.85]

The solidihed layer yields and returns to the liquid phase if the shear stress excesses the critical value, which initiates the sliding. When the stress is relaxed as a result of slip, the solid phase resumes again. The periodic transition between the solid and liquid states has been interpreted in the literature as a major cause of the stick-slip motion in lubricated sliding. Understanding the stick-slip and static friction in terms of solid-liquid transitions in thin films makes a re-... [Pg.85]

The classical theory predicts values for the dynamic exponents of s = 0 and z = 3. Since s = 0, the viscosity diverges at most logarithmically at the gel point. Using Eq. 1-14, a relaxation exponent of n = 1 can be attributed to classical theory [34], Dynamic scaling based on percolation theory [34,40] does not yield unique results for the dynamic exponents as it does for the static exponents. Several models can be found that result in different values for n, s and z. These models use either Rouse and Zimm limits of hydrodynamic interactions or Electrical Network analogies. The following values were reported [34,39] (Rouse, no hydrodynamic interactions) n = 0.66, s = 1.35, and z = 2.7, (Zimm, hydrodynamic interactions accounted for) n = 1, s = 0, and z = 2.7, and (Electrical Network) n = 0.71, s = 0.75 and z = 1.94. [Pg.184]

By equating the vertical component of the yield stress over the surface of the sphere to the weight of the particle, a critical value of = 0.17 is obtained (Chhabra, 1992). Experimentally, however, the results appear to fall into groups one for which F(i fa 0.2 and one for which F(i fa 0.04—0.08. There seems to be no consensus as to the correct value, and the difference may well be due to the fact that the yield stress is not an unambiguous empirical parameter, inasmuch as values determined from static measurements can differ significantly from the values determined from dynamic measurements. [Pg.359]


See other pages where Yield value static is mentioned: [Pg.100]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.188]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.367]    [Pg.494]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.255]    [Pg.454]    [Pg.1889]    [Pg.522]    [Pg.459]    [Pg.359]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.521]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.379]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.281]    [Pg.459]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.348]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.1224]    [Pg.289]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.465]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.357]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.268]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.216 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info