Wave functions representation

The expressions eqs. (1.197), (1.199), (1.200), (1.201) are completely general. From them it is clear that the reduced density matrices are much more economical tools for representing the electronic structure than the wave functions. The two-electron density (more demanding quantity of the two) depends only on two pairs of electronic variables (either continuous or discrete) instead of N electronic variables required by the wave function representation. The one-electron density is even simpler since it depends only on one pair of such coordinates. That means that in the density matrix representation only about (2M)4 numbers are necessary to describe the system (in fact - less due to antisymmetry), whereas the description in terms of the wave function requires, as we know n 2m-n) numbers (FCI expansion amplitudes). However, the density matrices are rarely used directly in quantum chemistry procedures. The reason is the serious problem which appears when one is trying to construct the adequate representation for the left hand sides of the above definitions without addressing any wave functions in the right hand sides. This is known as the (V-representability problem, unsolved until now [51] for the two-electron density matrices. The second is that the symmetry conditions for the electronic states are much easier formulated and controlled in terms of the wave functions (Density matrices are the entities of the second power with respect to the wave functions so their symmetries are described by the second tensor powers of those of the wave functions). 

However, the solution given by Eq. (4.277) is based on the form of effective independent-electron Hamiltonians that can be quite empirically constructed - as in Extended Huckel Theory (Hoffmann, 1963) such arbitrariness can be nevertheless avoided by the so-called self-consistentfield (SCF) in which the one-electron effective Hamiltonian is considered such that to depend by the solution of Eq. (4.266) itself, i.e., by the matrix of coefficients (C) this way we identify the resulted Hamiltonian as the Fock operator, while the associated eigen-problem rewrites the Hartree-Fock equation (4.267) under the mono-electronic wave-function representation ... 

This rather modest number of carefully selected electrons allows an accurate wave-function representation of the complex system involved, thus lending itself to the use of QMC to account accurately for electron correlation. To our knowledge, this is the first time that QMC will have been used to study a reaction taking place on a surface. 

Single surface calculations with a vector potential in the adiabatic representation and two surface calculations in the diabatic representation with or without shifting the conical intersection from the origin are performed using Cartesian coordinates. As in the asymptotic region the two coordinates of the model represent a translational and a vibrational mode, respectively, the initial wave function for the ground state can be represented as. 

It is important to note that the two surface calculations will be carried out in the diabatic representation. One can get the initial diabatic wave function matrix for the two surface calculations using the above adiabatic initial wave function by the following orthogonal transformation,... 

Single surface calculations with proper phase treatment in the adiabatic representation with shifted conical intersection has been performed in polai coordinates. For this calculation, the initial adiabatic wave function tad(9, 4 > o) is obtained by mapping t, to) ittlo polai space using the relations,... 

The projection on the final channel is done in the following manner. We let the trajectory decide on the channel—just as in an ordinary classical trajectory program. Once the channel is detemrined we project the wave function (in the DVR representation) on the appropriate wave function for that channel... 

This section attempts a brief review of several areas of research on the significance of phases, mainly for quantum phenomena in molecular systems. Evidently, due to limitation of space, one cannot do justice to the breadth of the subject and numerous important works will go unmentioned. It is hoped that the several cited papers (some of which have been chosen from quite recent publications) will lead the reader to other, related and earlier, publications. It is essential to state at the outset that the overall phase of the wave function is arbitrary and only the relative phases of its components are observable in any meaningful sense. Throughout, we concentrate on the relative phases of the components. (In a coordinate representation of the state function, the phases of the components are none other than the coordinate-dependent parts of the phase, so it is also true that this part is susceptible to measurement. Similar statements can be made in momentum, energy, etc., representations.)... 

A time-varying wave function is also obtained with a time-independent Hamiltonian by placing the system initially into a superposition of energy eigenstates ( n)), or forming a wavepacket. Frequently, a coordinate representation is used for the wave function, which then may be written as... 

This makes it desirable to define other representations in addition to the electronically adiabatic one [Eqs. (9)-(12)], in which the adiabatic electronic wave function basis set used in the Bom-Huang expansion (12) is replaced by another basis set of functions of the electronic coordinates. Such a different electronic basis set can be chosen so as to minimize the above mentioned gradient term. This term can initially be neglected in the solution of the / -electionic-state nuclear motion Schrodinger equation and reintroduced later using perturbative or other methods, if desired. This new basis set of electronic wave functions can also be made to depend parametrically, like their adiabatic counterparts, on the internal nuclear coordinates q that were defined after Eq. (8). This new electronic basis set is henceforth refened to as diabatic and, as is obvious, leads to an electronically diabatic representation that is not unique unlike the adiabatic one, which is unique by definition. 

U(qJ is referred to as an adiabatic-to-diabatic transformation (ADT) matrix. Its mathematical sbucture is discussed in detail in Section in.C. If the electronic wave functions in the adiabatic and diabatic representations are chosen to be real, as is normally the case, U(q ) is orthogonal and therefore has n n — l)/2 independent elements (or degrees of freedom). This transformation mabix U(qO can be chosen so as to yield a diabatic electronic basis set with desired properties, which can then be used to derive the diabatic nuclear motion Schrodinger equation. By using Eqs. (27) and (28) and the orthonormality of the diabatic and adiabatic electronic basis sets, we can relate the adiabatic and diabatic nuclear wave functions through the same n-dimensional unitary transformation matrix U(qx) according to... 

In the -electronic-state adiabatic representation involving real electronic wave functions, the skew-symmetiic first-derivative coupling vector mahix... 

In the two-adiabatic-electronic-state Bom-Huang description of the total orbital wave function, we wish to solve the corresponding nuclear motion Schrodinger equation in the diabatic representation... 

A number of procedures have been proposed to map a wave function onto a function that has the form of a phase-space distribution. Of these, the oldest and best known is the Wigner function [137,138]. (See [139] for an exposition using Louiville space.) For a review of this, and other distributions, see [140]. The quantum mechanical density matrix is a matrix representation of the density operator... 

To deal with the problem of using a superposition of functions, Heller also tried using Gaussian wave packets with a fixed width as a time-dependent basis set for the representation of the evolving nuclear wave function [23]. Each frozen Gaussian function evolves under classical equations of motion, and the phase is provided by the classical action along the path... 

In a diabatic representation, the electronic wave functions are no longer eigenfunctions of the electronic Hamiltonian. The aim is instead that the functions are so chosen that the (nonlocal) non-adiabatic coupling operator matrix, A in Eq. (52), vanishes, and the couplings are represented by (local) potential operators. The nuclear Schrddinger equation is then written... 

Making use of the polar representation of a complex number, the nuclear wave function can be written as a product of a real amplitude, A, and a real phase, S,... 

It is useful to represent the polyelectronic wave function of a compound by a valence bond (VB) structure that represents the bonding between the atoms. Frequently, a single VB structure suffices, sometimes it is necessary to use several. We assume for simplicity that a single VB stiucture provides a faithful representation. A common way to write down a VB structure is by the spin-paired determinant, that ensures the compliance with Pauli s principle (It is assumed that there are 2n paired electrons in the system)... 

For molecules with an even number of electrons, the spin function has only single-valued representations just as the spatial wave function. For these molecules, any degenerate spin-orbit state is unstable in the symmetric conformation since there is always a nontotally symmetric normal coordinate along which the potential energy depends linearly. For example, for an - state of a C3 molecule, the spin function has species da and E that upon... 

---