Functional representation

Functional representation uses the parameter of a functional curve for the detection of similarities. In the 1970s, the programming of graphical methods required the expenditure of much effort, whereas functional representations were easy to program. AN- 

DREWS [1972], for example, uses a FOURIER curve /(/) to demonstrate u-dimen-sional observations  

The argument / varies in the interval -n to +n, the parameters xb x2. x5 are the values of the different features of one object, so that one object vector is represented by /(/). Curves close to each other represent similar objects. 

The resulting function also possesses other interesting properties. The function preserves the total mean of the features from one object because the values of the features change the amplitudes, whereas only the number of features changes the frequencies. Also variances for one object are maintained. Distances between two functions reflect dissimilarities between the objects. The example of the circle, square, and triangle in Section 5.2.2 demonstrates the quality of this method. Eight features are included in each FOURIER curve. The circle and the square resemble each other more than the triangle (Fig. 5-9). 

A problem with the ANDREWS plot is that if variables of one object are permuted, a quite different picture arises because the amplitudes of the different harmonic oscillations change. It is, therefore, better if the functions are associated with principal components (see Section 5.4) of the set of features. Principal components are linear combinations of the features and explain the total variance of the data in descending order. In this manner the sequence of features, i.e. the sequence of the single principal components, should not be permuted in the ANDREWS plot. 

---

Truhlar D G and Horowitz C J 1978 Functional representation of Liu and Siegbahn s accurate ab initio potential energy calculations for H + H2 J. Chem. Phys. 68 2466... 

The transfer function representation of a time delay discussed in Sec. 2.1.3 is given by... 

The representation of tp(x, t) by the sine function is completely equivalent to the cosine-function representation the only difference is a shift by A/4 in the value of X when t = 0. Moreover, any linear combination of sine and cosine representations is also an equivalent description of the simple harmonic wave. The most general representation of the harmonic wave is the complex function... 

For convenience of argumentation, we from now on use the function representation of our formalism, which restrains the generality of the results only in the sense that the L2 space is a particular example of separable Hilbert space the generalization to any separable Hilbert space is, however, straightforward. 

The limitation of transfer function representation becomes plain obvious as we tackle more complex problems. For complex systems with multiple inputs and outputs, transfer function matrices can become very clumsy. In the so-called modem control, the method of choice is state space or state variables in time domain—essentially a matrix representation of the model equations. The formulation allows us to make use of theories in linear algebra and differential equations. It is always a mistake to tackle modem control without a firm background in these mathematical topics. For this reason, we will not overreach by doing both the mathematical background and the control together. Without a formal mathematical framework, we will put the explanation in examples as much as possible. The actual state space control has to be delayed until after tackling classical transfer function feedback systems. 

Understand the how a state space representation is related to the transfer function representation. 

If we interpret the weights and abscissas as a delta-function representation of the NDF ... 

For the moment estimates, we have seen that the composition PDF, /, (delta functions (i.e., the empirical PDF in (6.210)). However, it should be intuitively apparent that this representation is unsatisfactory for understanding the behavior of fyiir) as a function of fj. In practice, the delta-function representation is replaced by a histogram using finite-sized bins in composition space (see Fig. 6.5). The histogram h, (k) for the /ctli cell in composition space is defined by... 

A functional representation of the approximate form of the universal function F has been obtained by Huang and Nickerson as (Huang, 1979)... 

We will use this matrix of transfer function representation extensively in the rest of our work with multivariable processes. 

The time-domain differential equation description of systems can be used instead of the Laplace-domain transfer function description. Naturally the two are related, and we will derive these relationships later in this chapter. State variables are very popular in electrical and mechanical engineering control problems which tend to be of lower order (fewer differential equations) than chemical engineering control problems. Transfer function representations are more useful in practical process control problems because the matrices are of lower order than would be required by a state variable representation. 

OPENLOOP AND CLOSEDLOOP SYSTEMS 15.4.1 Transfer Function Representation... 

Marshall, G.R., Barry, C.D. Functional representation of molecular volume for computer-aided drug design. Abstr. Amer. Cryst. Assoc., Honolulu, Hawaii 1979. 

As we pass to F2, with a minimal basis the amount of flexibility remaining is small. The only unpaired orbital in the atom is a 2/ one, and these are expeeted to form a o electron pair bond and a S+ molecular state. In fact, with 14 electrons and 8 orbitals (outside the core) there can be, at most, one unpaired orbital set in any structure. Therefore, in this case there is no distinction between the standard tableaux and HLSP function representations of the wave functions, and we give only one set of tables. As is seen from Table 11.21, there is oifly one configuration present at asymptotic distances. That shown is one of the combinations of two P atoms. 

The standard tableaux function representation is similar. The principal term is the same as the only term at i = oo, and together with the fourth term (the other standard tableau of the constellation) represents the two electron pair bonds of the double bond. The second and third terms are the same as those in the HLSP function representation and even have the same coefficients, since there is only one function of this sort. 

Methods that have been developed for the solution of the Fredholm equation sometimes rely on continuous functional representations of s(x — x ) and i(x). These methods are limited in usefulness for the experimentalist, who wishes to apply deconvolution techniques by computer to digitized spectra. 

Existence and uniqueness of solutions to the b.v.p. analogous to (2.2.1) has been proved in numerous contexts (see, e.g., [2]—[6]) and can be easily inferred for (2.2.1). We shall not do it here. Instead we shall assume the existence and uniqueness for (2.2.1) and similar formulations and, based on this assumption, we shall discuss some simple properties of the appropriate solutions. These properties will follow from those of the solution of the one-dimensional Poisson-Boltzmann equation, combined with two elementary comparison theorems for the nonlinear Poisson equation. These theorems follow from the Green s function representation for the solution of the nonlinear Poisson equation with a monotonic right-hand side (or from the maximum principle arguments [20]) and may be stated as follows. 

The results of this section, even with their limitations, are the punch line of our story, the particularly beautiful goal promised in the preface. Now is a perfect time for the reader to take a few moments to reflect on the journey. We have studied a significant amount of mathematics, including approximations in vector spaces of functions, representations, invariance, isomorphism, irreducibility and tensor products. We have used some big theorems, such as the Stone-Weierstrass Theorem, Fubini s Theorem and the Spectral Theorem. Was it worth it And, putting aside any aesthetic pleasure the reader may have experienced, was it worth it from the experimental point of view In other words, are the predictions of this section worth the effort of building the mathematical machinery ... 

The range parameter was used in an exponential function representation of the initial distribution of distance, w(r0) = exp — r0/ /47rr2b, together with the scavenging probability of an ion-pair of separation, rn,p(r0, es) in eqn. (173). 

A) =0. The functional representation of the other blocks from Table 6.15... 

Precession continues until the next exchange point (f ) as shown in Figure 14B. At this point, the special role of the eigentransitions is lost therefore the vectors should be converted to the basis function representation. This is done according to Equation (66) p is the short form for Pab(t(r))) ... 

In summary then, we have shown that the construction of an exact density functional representation of one-dimensional Fermions with Newtonian kinetic energy can be carried out via the expansion of the control space to an infinite set of densities. The variational character of the formulation allows for the insertion of reasonable forms for the control fields, reducing their effective number to only a few. A very similar formulation has been proposed in three dimensions, whose utility is now under intense investigation. 

The expressions eqs. (1.197), (1.199), (1.200), (1.201) are completely general. From them it is clear that the reduced density matrices are much more economical tools for representing the electronic structure than the wave functions. The two-electron density (more demanding quantity of the two) depends only on two pairs of electronic variables (either continuous or discrete) instead of N electronic variables required by the wave function representation. The one-electron density is even simpler since it depends only on one pair of such coordinates. That means that in the density matrix representation only about (2M)4 numbers are necessary to describe the system (in fact - less due to antisymmetry), whereas the description in terms of the wave function requires, as we know n 2m-n) numbers (FCI expansion amplitudes). However, the density matrices are rarely used directly in quantum chemistry procedures. The reason is the serious problem which appears when one is trying to construct the adequate representation for the left hand sides of the above definitions without addressing any wave functions in the right hand sides. This is known as the (V-representability problem, unsolved until now [51] for the two-electron density matrices. The second is that the symmetry conditions for the electronic states are much easier formulated and controlled in terms of the wave functions (Density matrices are the entities of the second power with respect to the wave functions so their symmetries are described by the second tensor powers of those of the wave functions). 

---