Wastewater treatment tertiary

Alonso E, Santos A, Solis GJ, Riesco P (2001) On the feasibility or urban wastewater tertiary treatment by membranes a comparative assessment. Desalination 141 39-51... 

Variables under consideration Drinking water treatment Wastewater (tertiary) treatment... 

Process water streams from vinyl chloride manufacture are typically steam-stripped to remove volatile organics, neutralized, and then treated in an activated sludge system to remove any nonvolatile organics. If fluidized-bed oxychlorination is used, the process wastewater may also contain suspended catalyst fines and dissolved metals. The former can easily be removed by sedimentation, and the latter by precipitation. Depending on the specific catalyst formulation and outfall limitations, tertiary treatment may be needed to reduce dissolved metals to acceptable levels. 

Fluidized-bed powdered activated carbon systems represent another important process. The use of activated carbon for the tertiary treatment of secondary sewage effluents has been used extensively. Powdered carbon is as effective as granular activated carbon for removing the organic impurities from the wastewater. 

AOPs are valuable tertiary treatments allowing not only inactivation of a wide spectrum of pathogens but also the removal of a great number of the so-called emerging pollutants (pharmaceutical, personal care products). These are not totally removed during conventional treatment, but remain in the wastewater effluents [33]. Among different alternatives electrochemical oxidation with bom doped diamond electrodes (BDD) has been reported to be effective on eliminating... 

The viability of producing regenerated water for industrial reuse purposes by means of tertiary treatment of WWTP effluents is illustrated in this section, through examples in N Spain. The demonstration has been performed in Spain. The industrial activities in the selected region showed that the potential industrial demand of regenerated wastewater accounted for 5.2 Hm yr which could be obtained from WWTP facilities located 5 km away of the industrial consumers,... 

Inputs from WWTP effluents can also affect the hydrologic and nutrient concentration regimes of recipient streams at different temporal scales. Daily variations of these parameters may be exacerbated in streams below the WWTP input by the diel patterns of the effluent discharge associated with plant operation [46]. In contrast, at the annual scale, seasonal variations of physical and chemical parameters upstream of the WWTP may be dampened by the constant input of additional water and nutrients from the WWTP. At its extreme, naturally intermittent or ephemeral streams may turn into permanent streams downstream of WWTPs [28, 30]. In these effluent-dominated streams, the relative contribution of WWTP inputs may vary widely on an annual basis, as shown by the 3-100% range measured in a Mediterranean stream [47]. Finally, WWTP inputs also cause shifts in the relative availability of N and P as well as in the relative importance of reduced and oxidized forms of N in the stream [30, 47]. The magnitude of these shifts depends on the level of wastewater treatment (i.e., primary, secondary, or tertiary treatment), the type of WWTP infrastructure (e.g., activated sludge reactor. 

Vourch et al49 studied the applicability of the RO process for the dairy industry wastewater. The treated wastewater total organic carbon (TOC) was <7 mg/L. It was found that in order to treat a flow of 100 m3/d, 540 m2 of the RO unit is required with 95% water recovery. Dead-end NF and RO were studied for the treatment of dairy wastewater.50 Permeate COD, monovalent ion rejection, and multivalent ion rejection for the dead-end NF were reported as 173-1095 mg/L, 50-84%, and 92.4-99.9%, respectively. When it comes to the dead-end RO membranes, the values for permeate COD, monovalent ion removal, and multivalent ion removal were 45-120 mg/L, >93.8%, and 99.6%, respectively. Membrane filtration technology can be better utilized as a tertiary treatment technology and the resultant effluent quality will be high. There can be situations where the treated effluents can be reused (especially if RO is used for the treatment). 

Advanced wastewater treatment techniques, for example oxidation processes, can achieve up to 100% removal for diclofenac [52,53], Reverse osmosis, activated carbon and ozonation have been shown to significantly reduce or eliminate antibiotics from wastewater effluents [32], The efficiency of two tertiary treatments, chlorination and UV disinfection, was compared and chlorination led to lower quantities of antibiotics [54],... 

TABLE 1 Comparative Operating Costs of Snowfluent versus Secondary and Tertiary Treatment of Wastewaters... 

---