Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Waste interactions

United States Environmental Protection Agency, EPA (Hatayama et al., 1980) has provided a matrix for determining the compatibility of hazardous wastes. Interactivity of substances has been presented with the consequences of the reaction such as heat formation, fire, rapid polymerization, formation of flammable gases etc. Also other similar matrices exist e.g. Chempat (Leggett, 1997). [Pg.52]

Water-Waste Interactions. It is appropriate to examine the water-waste interactions first since this is an extension of our previous interests in the high temperature solubility and mass transfer of corrosion products in power plants (2) and our perceptions in this area are therefore well developed. [Pg.338]

In the final section of the book, Part V, Water-Waste Interaction, various approaches to describe and predict the interaction between waste and water are presented. This part of the book does not only deal with landfills containing different types of municipal waste forms, but also with different nuclear waste forms. Of special interest are laboratory experiments on waste form corrosion and element speciation in aqueous media that represent realistic disposal... [Pg.4]

Chiellini, E., Cinelli, P., D Antone, S., Ilieva, V.I., Magni, S., Miele, S., and Pampana, S., 2003, Hybrid Liquid Mulch Based on Poly(Vinyl Alcohol) and Agroindustrial Waste. Interaction with the Soil. Macromol. Symp. in press. [Pg.209]

Helium from Natural Gas. Recovery of helium from a given natural-gas stream depends almost entirely on the total economic picture of the stream. In the United States, the lowest practical helium level that is recovered is most frequendy 0.3 vol %, although helium is frequendy ignored, and hence wasted, in streams containing somewhat high concentrations. In other parts of the wodd where political considerations sometimes interact with the economic, the use of helium concentrations lower than 0.3 vol % maybe dictated. [Pg.10]

The overall requirement is 1.0—2.0 s for low energy waste compared to typical design standards of 2.0 s for RCRA ha2ardous waste units. The most important, ie, rate limiting steps are droplet evaporation and chemical reaction. The calculated time requirements for these steps are only approximations and subject to error. For example, formation of a skin on the evaporating droplet may inhibit evaporation compared to the theory, whereas secondary atomization may accelerate it. Errors in estimates of the activation energy can significantly alter the chemical reaction rate constant, and the pre-exponential factor from equation 36 is only approximate. Also, interactions with free-radical species may accelerate the rate of chemical reaction over that estimated solely as a result of thermal excitation therefore, measurements of the time requirements are desirable. [Pg.56]

Polymerization and depolymerization of sihcate anions and their interactions with other ions and complexing agents are of great interest in sol—gel and catalyst manufacture, detergency, oil and gas production, waste management, and limnology (45—50). The complex silanol condensation process may be represented empirically by... [Pg.6]

Sulfur Polymer Cement. SPC has been proven effective in reducing leach rates of reactive heavy metals to the extent that some wastes can be managed solely as low level waste (LLW). When SPC is combined with mercury and lead oxides (both toxic metals), it interacts chemically to form mercury sulfide, HgS, and lead sulfide, PbS, both of which are insoluble in water. A dried sulfur residue from petroleum refining that contained 600-ppm vanadium (a carcinogen) was chemically modified using dicyclopentadiene and oligomer of cyclopentadiene and used to make SC (58). This material was examined by the California Department of Health Services (Cal EPA) and the leachable level of vanadium had been reduced to 8.3 ppm, well below the soluble threshold limit concentration of 24 ppm (59). [Pg.126]

Based upon the above-mentioned species interactions, pilot-scale testing is generally recommended to accurately size a biofilter bed for a multicomponent waste gas stream. [Pg.2193]

This discussion of offsites is subdivided into Utilities and Other Offsites. The utility portion interacts with the process area, while the other offsites have minor interaction w ith the process area, if any. In addition, the process area may have utility generation, such as waste heat boilers. It is convenient to discuss all utility generation as one package pointing out special considerations for the process area units along the way. The goal for this study phase is the same as for battery limits specification complete major material list and process specification sheets. [Pg.226]

As noted for the other chemieals, the preeeding reactions are merely approximations to the more eomplex interactions which actually occur in waste waters. The lime demand of a given wastewater is a funetion of the buffer eapaeity or alkalinity of the wastewater. [Pg.104]

How does the system interact widi die enviromiient (e.g., hazardous waste streams, to.xic releases, etc.)... [Pg.438]

First, handling of highly concentrated acids, including hydrofluoric acid, especially at elevated temperatures, is very dangerous and requires use of special equipment and appropriate training of personnel. Second, the required amount of fluorine (or HF) is well above the amount needed based on the interaction stoichiometry. This results in large amounts of liquid waste, the treatment of which is very expensive. [Pg.263]

The mobile phase is interesting in that the water is buffered appropriately to complement the dissociation constants of the solutes. A mixture of methanol and acetonitrile is employed, the acetonitrile being used to increase the dispersive interactions in the mobile phase. The reason for the particular solvent mixture is not clear and it would appear that the separation might be achieved equally well by using a stronger solution of methanol alone or a more dilute solution acetonitrile alone. There is no particular advantage to one solvent mixture over another except for the fact that waste acetonitrile produces greater solvent disposal problems than methanol. [Pg.302]


See other pages where Waste interactions is mentioned: [Pg.813]    [Pg.813]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.625]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.813]    [Pg.813]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.625]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.411]    [Pg.194]    [Pg.478]    [Pg.394]    [Pg.400]    [Pg.459]    [Pg.2171]    [Pg.206]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.454]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.286]    [Pg.428]    [Pg.504]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.313]    [Pg.342]    [Pg.392]    [Pg.732]    [Pg.275]    [Pg.316]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.448]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.247]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.7 ]




SEARCH



Near field waste-water interactions

Waste geologic environment interaction

Waste rock interactions

Waste salt interactions

Waste with geologic material, interactions

Waste-reservoir interactions

Waste-water interactions

Water-waste interactions, radioactive

© 2024 chempedia.info