Unities

In vapor-liquid equilibria, it is relatively easy to start the iteration because assumption of ideal behavior (Raoult s law) provides a reasonable zeroth approximation. By contrast, there is no obvious corresponding method to start the iteration calculation for liquid-liquid equilibria. Further, when two liquid phases are present, we must calculate for each component activity coefficients in two phases since these are often strongly nonlinear functions of compositions, liquid-liquid equilibrium calculations are highly sensitive to small changes in composition. In vapor-liquid equilibria at modest pressures, this sensitivity is lower because vapor-phase fugacity coefficients are usually close to unity and only weak functions of composition. For liquid-liquid equilibria, it is therefore more difficult to construct a numerical iteration procedure that converges both rapidly and consistently. 

If the vapor mixture contains only ideal gases, the integrals in Equations (3) and (6) are zero, z is unity for all compositions, and ()i equals 1 for each component i. At low pressures, typically less than 1 bar, it is frequently a good assumption to set ( ) = 1, but even at moderately low pressures, say in the vicinity of 1 to 10 bars, (f) is often significantly different from unity, especially if i is a polar component. 

The virial equation is appropriate for describing deviations from ideality in those systems where moderate attractive forces yield fugacity coefficients not far removed from unity. The systems shown in Figures 2, 3, and 4 are of this type. However, in systems containing carboxylic acids, there prevails an entirely different physical situation since two acid molecules tend to form a pair of stable hydrogen bonds, large negative... 

By contrast, in the system propionic acid d) - methyl isobutyl ketone (2), (fi and are very much different when y 1, Propionic acid has a strong tendency to dimerize with itself and only a weak tendency to dimerize with ketone also,the ketone has only a weak tendency to dimerize with itself. At acid-rich compositions, therefore, many acid molecules have dimerized but most ketone molecules are monomers. Acid-acid dimerization lowers the fugacity of acid and thus is well below unity. Because of acid-acid dimerization, the true mole fraction of ketone is signi-... 

A component in a vapor mixture exhibits nonideal behavior as a result of molecular interactions only when these interactions are very wea)c or very infrequent is ideal behavior approached. The fugacity coefficient (fi is a measure of nonideality and a departure of < ) from unity is a measure of the extent to which a molecule i interacts with its neighbors. The fugacity coefficient depends on pressure, temperature, and vapor composition this dependence, in the moderate pressure region covered by the truncated virial equation, is usually as follows ... 

P the other terms provide corrections which at low or moderate pressure are close to unity. To use Equation (2), we require vapor-pressure data and liquid-density data as a function of temperature. We also require fugacity coefficients, as discussed in Chapter 3. 

As discussed in Chapter 3, at moderate pressures, vapor-phase nonideality is usually small in comparison to liquid-phase nonideality. However, when associating carboxylic acids are present, vapor-phase nonideality may dominate. These acids dimerize appreciably in the vapor phase even at low pressures fugacity coefficients are well removed from unity. To illustrate. Figures 8 and 9 show observed and calculated vapor-liquid equilibria for two systems containing an associating component. 

Finally, Table 2 shows enthalpy calculations for the system nitrogen-water at 100 atm. in the range 313.5-584.7°K. [See also Figure (4-13).] The mole fraction of nitrogen in the liquid phase is small throughout, but that in the vapor phase varies from essentially unity at the low-temperature end to zero at the high-temperature end. In the liquid phase, the enthalpy is determined primarily by the temperature, but in the vapor phase it is determined by both temperature and composition. 

If the data are correlated assuming an ideal vapor, the reference fugacity is just the vapor pressure, P , the Poynting correction is neglected, and fugacity coefficient is assumed to be unity. Equation (2) then becomes... 

After the primary step in a photochemical reaction, the secondary processes may be quite complicated, e.g. when atoms and free radicals are fcrnied. Consequently the quantum yield, i.e. the number of molecules which are caused to react for a single quantum of light absorbed, is only exceptionally equal to exactly unity. E.g. the quantum yield of the decomposition of methyl iodide by u.v. light is only about 10" because some of the free radicals formed re-combine. The quantum yield of the reaction of H2 -f- CI2 is 10 to 10 (and the mixture may explode) because this is a chain reaction. 

The formation volume factor for water (B, reservoir volume per stock tank volume), is close to unity (typically between 1.00 and 1.07 rb/stb, depending on amount of dissolved gas, and reservoir conditions), and is greater than unity due to the thermal contraction and evolution of gas from reservoir to stock tank conditions. 

If the mobility ratio is greater than 1.0, then there will be a tendency for the water to move preferentially through the reservoir, and give rise to an unfavourable displacement front which is described as viscous fingering. If the mobility ratio is less than unity, then one would expect stable displacement, as shown in Figure 8.16. The mobility ratio may be influenced by altering the fluid viscosities, and this is further discussed in Section 8.8, when enhanced oil recovery is introduced. 

Figure 2 Flow diagram of the DHT with N=8, P=3. Broken lines represent transfer factors -1 while full lines represent unity transfer factor. The crossover boxes perform the sign reversal called for by the shift theorem which also requires the sine and cosine factors Sn, Cn.

The deviation of Gibbs monolayers from the ideal two-dimensional gas law may be treated by plotting xA// 7 versus x, as shown in Fig. III-15c. Here, for a series of straight-chain alcohols, one finds deviations from ideality increasing with increasing film pressure at low x values, however, the limiting value of unity for irAfRT is approached. 

Derive the equation of state, that is, the relationship between t and a, of the adsorbed film for the case of a surface active electrolyte. Assume that the activity coefficient for the electrolyte is unity, that the solution is dilute enough so that surface tension is a linear function of the concentration of the electrolyte, and that the electrolyte itself (and not some hydrolyzed form) is the surface-adsorbed species. Do this for the case of a strong 1 1 electrolyte and a strong 1 3 electrolyte. 

Customarily, it is assumed that e is unity and that ]l = p,cos 9, where 0 is the angle of inclination of the dipoles to the normal. Harkins and Fischer [86] point out the empirical nature of this interpretation and prefer to consider only that AV is proportional to the surface concentration F and that the proportionality constant is some quantity characteristic of the film. This was properly cautious as there are many indications that the surface of water is structured and that the structure is altered by the film (see Ref. 37). Accompanying any such structural rearrangement of the substrate at the surface should be a change in its contribution to the surface potential so that AV should not be assigned too literally to the film molecules. 

---