Fugacity pressure

As the behavior or water vapor is generally assumed to be ideal (fugacity = pressure), x is the activity of water. 

Structural metals become more susceptible to hydrogen embrittlement as the materials are exposed to higher gas pressures. Thermodynamic equilibrium between hydrogen gas and dissolved atomic hydrogen is expressed by the general form of Sievert s Law, i.e. C = Sf [16]. This relationship shows that as fugacity (pressure) increases, the quantity of atomic hydrogen dissolved in the material increases consequently, embrittlement becomes more severe. 

Fugacity pressure dependence. Sometimes we know the fugacity of a component at one pressure and we need to evaluate it at another pressure. We start with the standard relation... 

In vapor-liquid equilibria, it is relatively easy to start the iteration because assumption of ideal behavior (Raoult s law) provides a reasonable zeroth approximation. By contrast, there is no obvious corresponding method to start the iteration calculation for liquid-liquid equilibria. Further, when two liquid phases are present, we must calculate for each component activity coefficients in two phases since these are often strongly nonlinear functions of compositions, liquid-liquid equilibrium calculations are highly sensitive to small changes in composition. In vapor-liquid equilibria at modest pressures, this sensitivity is lower because vapor-phase fugacity coefficients are usually close to unity and only weak functions of composition. For liquid-liquid equilibria, it is therefore more difficult to construct a numerical iteration procedure that converges both rapidly and consistently. 

In Chapter 2 we discuss briefly the thermodynamic functions whereby the abstract fugacities are related to the measurable, real quantities temperature, pressure, and composition. This formulation is then given more completely in Chapters 3 and 4, which present detailed material on vapor-phase and liquid-phase fugacities, respectively. 

Equation (1) is of little practical use unless the fuga-cities can be related to the experimentally accessible quantities X, y, T, and P, where x stands for the composition (expressed in mole fraction) of the liquid phase, y for the composition (also expressed in mole fraction) of the vapor phase, T for the absolute temperature, and P for the total pressure, assumed to be the same for both phases. The desired relationship between fugacities and experimentally accessible quantities is facilitated by two auxiliary functions which are given the symbols (f... 

It is strictly for convenience that certain conventions have been adopted in the choice of a standard-state fugacity. These conventions, in turn, result from two important considerations (a) the necessity for an unambiguous thermodynamic treatment of noncondensable components in liquid solutions, and (b) the relation between activity coefficients given by the Gibbs-Duhem equation. The first of these considerations leads to a normalization for activity coefficients for nonoondensable components which is different from that used for condensable components, and the second leads to the definition and use of adjusted or pressure-independent activity coefficients. These considerations and their consequences are discussed in the following paragraphs. 

The standard-state fugacity of any component must be evaluated at the same temperature as that of the solution, regardless of whether the symmetric or unsymmetric convention is used for activity-coefficient normalization. But what about the pressure At low pressures, the effect of pressure on the thermodynamic properties of condensed phases is negligible and under such con-... 

The pressure at which standard-state fugacities are most conveniently evaluated is suggested by considerations based on the Gibbs-Duhem equation which says that at constant temperature and pressure... 

We find that the standard-state fugacity fV is the fugacity of pure liquid i at the temperature of the solution and at the reference pressure P. ... 

At pressures to a few bars, the vapor phase is at a relatively low density, i.e., on the average, the molecules interact with one another less strongly than do the molecules in the much denser liquid phase. It is therefore a common simplification to assume that all the nonideality in vapor-liquid systems exist in the liquid phase and that the vapor phase can be treated as an ideal gas. This leads to the simple result that the fugacity of component i is given by its partial pressure, i.e. the product of y, the mole fraction of i in the vapor, and P, the total pressure. A somewhat less restrictive simplification is the Lewis fugacity rule which sets the fugacity of i in the vapor mixture proportional to its mole fraction in the vapor phase the constant of proportionality is the fugacity of pure i vapor at the temperature and pressure of the mixture. These simplifications are attractive because they make the calculation of vapor-liquid equilibria much easier the K factors = i i ... 

Unfortunately, the ideal-gas assumption can sometimes lead to serious error. While errors in the Lewis rule are often less, that rule has inherent in it the problem of evaluating the fugacity of a fictitious substance since at least one of the condensable components cannot, in general, exist as pure vapor at the temperature and pressure of the mixture. 

The fugacity fT of a component i in the vapor phase is related to its mole fraction y in the vapor phase and the total pressure P by the fugacity coefficient ... 

The fugacity coefficient is a function of temperature, total pressure, and composition of the vapor phase it can be calculated from volumetric data for the vapor mixture. For a mixture containing m components, such data are often expressed in the form of an equation of state explicit in the pressure... 

Figures 3 and 4 show fugacity coefficients for two binary systems calculated with Equation (10b). Although the pressure is not large, deviations from ideality and from the Lewis rule are not negligible.

Two additional illustrations are given in Figures 6 and 7 which show fugacity coefficients for two binary systems along the vapor-liquid saturation curve at a total pressure of 1 atm. These results are based on the chemical theory of vapor-phase imperfection and on experimental vapor-liquid equilibrium data for the binary systems. In the system formic acid (1) - acetic acid (2), <() (for y = 1) is lower than formic acid at 100.5°C has a stronger tendency to dimerize than does acetic acid at 118.2°C. Since strong dimerization occurs between all three possible pairs, (fij and not... 

A component in a vapor mixture exhibits nonideal behavior as a result of molecular interactions only when these interactions are very wea)c or very infrequent is ideal behavior approached. The fugacity coefficient (fi is a measure of nonideality and a departure of < ) from unity is a measure of the extent to which a molecule i interacts with its neighbors. The fugacity coefficient depends on pressure, temperature, and vapor composition this dependence, in the moderate pressure region covered by the truncated virial equation, is usually as follows ... 

To predict vapor-liquid or liquid-liquid equilibria in multicomponent systems, we require a method for calculating the fugacity of a component i in a liquid mixture. At system temperature T and system pressure P, this fugacity is written as a product of three terms... 

For condensable components, we use the symmetric normaliza-L as x - 1 therefore, the quantity in brackets is the fugacity of pure liquid i at system temperature and pressure. 

P the other terms provide corrections which at low or moderate pressure are close to unity. To use Equation (2), we require vapor-pressure data and liquid-density data as a function of temperature. We also require fugacity coefficients, as discussed in Chapter 3. 

As discussed in Chapter 3, at moderate pressures, vapor-phase nonideality is usually small in comparison to liquid-phase nonideality. However, when associating carboxylic acids are present, vapor-phase nonideality may dominate. These acids dimerize appreciably in the vapor phase even at low pressures fugacity coefficients are well removed from unity. To illustrate. Figures 8 and 9 show observed and calculated vapor-liquid equilibria for two systems containing an associating component. 

To illustrate calculations for a binary system containing a supercritical, condensable component. Figure 12 shows isobaric equilibria for ethane-n-heptane. Using the virial equation for vapor-phase fugacity coefficients, and the UNIQUAC equation for liquid-phase activity coefficients, calculated results give an excellent representation of the data of Kay (1938). In this case,the total pressure is not large and therefore, the mixture is at all times remote from critical conditions. For this binary system, the particular method of calculation used here would not be successful at appreciably higher pressures. 

Enthalpies are referred to the ideal vapor. The enthalpy of the real vapor is found from zero-pressure heat capacities and from the virial equation of state for non-associated species or, for vapors containing highly dimerized vapors (e.g. organic acids), from the chemical theory of vapor imperfections, as discussed in Chapter 3. For pure components, liquid-phase enthalpies (relative to the ideal vapor) are found from differentiation of the zero-pressure standard-state fugacities these, in turn, are determined from vapor-pressure data, from vapor-phase corrections and liquid-phase densities. If good experimental data are used to determine the standard-state fugacity, the derivative gives enthalpies of liquids to nearly the same precision as that obtained with calorimetric data, and provides reliable heats of vaporization. 

Correlations for standard-state fugacities at 2ero pressure, for the temperature range 200° to 600°K, were generated for pure fluids using the best available vapor-pressure data. 

These were converted from vapor pressure P to fugacity using the vapor-phase corrections (for pure components), discussed in Chapter 3 then the Poynting correction was applied to adjust to zero pressure ... 

At temperatures above those corresponding to the highest experimental pressures, data were generated using the Lyckman correlation all of these were assigned an uncertainty of 5% of the standard-state fugacity at zero pressure. Frequently, this uncertainty amounts to one half or more atmosphere for the lowest point, and to 1 to 5 atmospheres for the highest point. 

---