Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Transport processes direct effects

While it is inherently probable that product formation will be most readily initiated at sites of effective contact between reactants (A IB), it is improbable that this process alone is capable of permitting continued product formation at low temperature for two related reasons. Firstly (as discussed in detail in Sect. 2.1.1) the area available for chemical contact in a mixture of particles is a very small fraction of the total surface (and, indeed, this total surface constitutes only a small proportion of the reactant present). Secondly, bulk diffusion across a barrier layer is usually an activated process, so that interposition of product between the points of initial contact reduces the ease, and therefore the rate, of interaction. On completion of the first step in the reaction, the restricted zones of direct contact have undergone chemical modification and the continuation of reaction necessitates a transport process to maintain the migration of material from one solid to a reactive surface of the other. On increasing the temperature, surface migration usually becomes appreciable at temperatures significantly below those required for the onset of bulk diffusion within a product phase. It is to be expected that components of the less refractory constituent will migrate onto the surfaces of the other solid present. These ions are chemisorbed as the first step in product formation and, in a subsequent process, penetrate the outer layers of the... [Pg.254]

The assessment of clearance is complicated by the numerous mechanisms by which compounds may be cleared from the body. These mechanisms include oxidative metabolism, most commonly by CYP enzymes, but also in some cases by other enzymes including but not limited to monoamine oxidases (MAO), flavin-containing monooxygenases (FMO), and aldehyde oxidase [45, 46], Non-oxidative metabolism such as conjugation or hydrolysis may be effected by enzymes such as glucuronyl transferases (UGT), glutathione transferases (GST), amidases, esterases, or ketone reductases, as well as other enzymes [47, 48], In addition to metabolic pathways, parent compound may be excreted directly via passive or active transport processes, most commonly into the urine or bile. [Pg.155]

There are three types of mass transport processes within a microfluidic system convection, diffusion, and immigration. Much more common are mixtures of three types of mass transport. It is essential to design a well-controlled transport scheme for the microsystem. Convection can be generated by different forces, such as capillary effect, thermal difference, gravity, a pressurized air bladder, the centripetal forces in a spinning disk, mechanical and electroosmotic pumps, in the microsystem. The mechanical and electroosmotic pumps are often used for transport in a microfluidic system due to their convenience, and will be further discussed in section 11.5.2. The migration is a direct transport of molecules in response to an electric field. In most cases, the moving... [Pg.386]

Since diffusional effects are most important, we wish to emphasize these processes in the gas phase. For the control volume selected in Figure 9.7, the bold assumption is made that transport processes across the lateral faces in the x direction do not change - or change very slowly. Thus we only consider changes in the y direction. This approximation is known as the stagnant layer model since the direct effect of the main flow velocity (it) is not expressed. A differential control volume Ay x Ax x unity is selected. [Pg.235]

Because biomagnification and other transport processes take time, the harmful effect of many compoimds may not become evident for decades. This makes direct causal relationships between specific pollutants and environmental change difficult to establish. Substantiating such relationships is further complicated by the complex network of positive and negative feedbacks that occur among most parts of the crustal-ocean-atmosphere fectory. [Pg.773]

This review has highlighted the important effects that should be modeled. These include two-phase flow of liquid water and gas in the fuel-cell sandwich, a robust membrane model that accounts for the different membrane transport modes, nonisothermal effects, especially in the directions perpendicular to the sandwich, and multidimensional effects such as changing gas composition along the channel, among others. For any model, a balance must be struck between the complexity required to describe the physical reality and the additional costs of such complexity. In other words, while more complex models more accurately describe the physics of the transport processes, they are more computationally costly and may have so many unknown parameters that their results are not as meaningful. Hopefully, this review has shown and broken down for the reader the vast complexities of transport within polymer-electrolyte fuel cells and the various ways they have been and can be modeled. [Pg.483]

Most endothelial cell membranes are ordinarily impermeable to proteins. Transport across these barriers occurs only with the aid of receptor-mediated or other transport processes. However, many active sites (receptors) are located on cell surfaces and there is no need to permeate the cell. To achieve an adequate intracellular concentration, relatively large amounts of protein must be administered. Proteins administered by nonparenteral means and intended for systemic effects, such as intranasally and directly into the lungs. [Pg.346]

In PEMFC systems, water is transported in both transversal and lateral direction in the cells. A polymer electrolyte membrane (PEM) separates the anode and the cathode compartments, however water is inherently transported between these two electrodes by absorption, desorption and diffusion of water in the membrane.5,6 In operational fuel cells, water is also transported by an electro-osmotic effect and thus transversal water content distribution in the membrane is determined as a result of coupled water transport processes including diffusion, electro-osmosis, pressure-driven convection and interfacial mass transfer. To establish water management method in PEMFCs, it is strongly needed to obtain fundamental understandings on water transport in the cells. [Pg.202]

However, the interplay between electrolyte and polymer layer needs to be considered when optimizing the performances of polymer-modified electrodes. Structural factors will influence the interfacial ion transport and this will have a direct effect on the mechanism and location within the polymer layer of the mediation process. The following discussion will show that the nature of the mediation process can be changed dramatically by changing the electrolyte, from a situation where an electrochemical sensor with good sensitivity is obtained, to a situation where the sensitivity obtained is not much better than that observed for the bare electrode. [Pg.250]

An important problem which arises when quantifying transport processes in membranes is the fact that they typically possess a composite structure. Although one layer is usually the main resistor to transport, effects caused by other layers can generally not be completely neglected (e.g., Ref. [33]). For this reason, integral descriptions of composite membranes should be applied carefully, as they cannot explain observed direction-dependences of fluxes [34]. [Pg.367]

Thus, under equilibrium conditions, the emf of the double electrode-pair system is determined solely by electric potential differences developed at the two liquid junctions that involve KC1 salt bridges. The two Ej may differ because of the effect of soil colloids. Thus the fact that this emf can develop is known as the suspension effect.40 Only ionic transport processes across the liquid junctions need be taken into account in order to evaluate E. Ionic transport processes across the semipermeable membrane between the suspension and the solution are not germane. Moreover, since neither Ej nor Ej can be calculated by strictly thermodynamic methods, the interpretation of E must be made in terms of specific models of ionic transport across salt bridges contacting suspensions and solutions. Thus the relation between E and the behavior of ions in soil suspensions is not direct. [Pg.84]


See other pages where Transport processes direct effects is mentioned: [Pg.297]    [Pg.451]    [Pg.928]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.488]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.290]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.425]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.445]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.244]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.436]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.508]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.276]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.331]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.282]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.372]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.206]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.386]    [Pg.495]   


SEARCH



Direct Process

Direct effects

Directed processes

Directing effect

Directing process

Directional effect

Directive effects

Effective transport

Transport effects

Transport processes

Transportation processes

© 2024 chempedia.info