Toxicity drinking water

State of California Health and Welfare Agency Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986. 

Rats showed no adverse effects from 5.0% dipropylene glycol in their drinking water for 77 days, but at a dose of 10.0% in the drinking water, kidney and Hver injury and some deaths occurred (35). A sufficient number of studies have not been carried out on tripropylene glycol to permit conclusions to be drawn regarding its chronic oral toxicity. 

Health and Safety Aspects. The U.S. EPA has significantly reduced the aHowed levels of antimony compounds in drinking water causing a toxicity cloud over the viabHity of this class of stabilizers. Presently, antimony products are no longer aHowed for use as potable water pipe stabilizers pending completion of NSE International s review (28). Eor these reasons, the future of this stabilizer technology appears limited. 

All the PMBs are Hsted on the U.S. EPA s Toxic Substances Control Act NonConfidential Chemical Substances Inventory (Table 8). In the early to mid-1980s, pseudocumene, mesitylene, hemimellitene, and trimethylbenzene were coveted by TSCA Section 8(a) Preliminary Assessment Information Rule (PAIR) reporting requirements (22) and by TSCA Section 8(d) for health and safety data (23). Mesitylene is the subject of a test rule subacute oral toxicity and subchtonic oral toxicity in tats were underway in 1994 (24). The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) allows monitoring for pseudocumene and mesitylene at the discretion of the State (25). Of the PMBs, only pseudocumene is subject to SARA Tide III section 313 annual release reporting (26). 

Because the aminophenols are oxidized easily, they tend to remove oxygen from solutions. Hence, if they are released from industrial waste waters into streams and rivers, they will deplete the capacity of these environments to sustain aquatic life. Concern has also been raised that chlorination of drinking water may enhance the toxicity of aminophenols present as pollutants (138) chlorinated aminophenols are known to be more toxic (139). 

Avitrol [504-24-5] (4-anHnopyridine) (24), mp 155—158°C, bp 273°C, has repeUent—toxicant properties for birds and is classed as a severe poison and irritant. This secondary bird repeUent can be used as a broadcast bait, causing uncoordinated flight and distress caUs and escape responses in nearby birds (57). A reevaluation shows lack of effectiveness of 1% baits but better control of blackbirds with 3% baits (58). Suspected contamination of drinking water with 4-aminopyridine has been reported in toxicosis of Brahman catde and horses (59). 

Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Hazardous Materials Transportation Act (HMTA) Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA)... 

Administration of 5 ppm barium, the acetate, to mice in the drinking water in a life-time study had no observable effects on longevity, mortality, and body weights, or on the incidence of tumors (53). Long-term studies in rats exposed to Ba " in drinking water containing 5 mg/L, as acetate, or 10—250 mg/L, as chloride, resulted in no measurable toxic effects (47). 

Potable Water Treatment. Treatment of drinking water accounts for about 24% of the total activated carbon used in Hquid-phase apphcations (74). Rivers, lakes, and groundwater from weUs, the most common drinking water sources, are often contaminated with bacteria, vimses, natural vegetation decay products, halogenated materials, and volatile organic compounds. Normal water disinfection and filtration treatment steps remove or destroy the bulk of these materials (75). However, treatment by activated carbon is an important additional step in many plants to remove toxic and other organic materials (76—78) for safety and palatability. 

The United States has the most laws regarding environmental safety and health. The National Environmental PoHcy Act (NEPA) of 1969 has resulted in the following acts Eederal Insecticides, Eungicide and Rodenticide (EIERA), Resource Conservation and Recovery (RCRA), Superfund (CERCLA), Superfund Amendments and Reauthori2ation Act (SARA) Plus Tide III, Toxic Substance Control Act (TSCA), Clean Water (CWA), Water Quahty, Safe Drinking Water (SDWA), and Waste Minimi2ation and Control. 

States have made substantial recent progress in the adoption, and EPA approval, of toxic pollutant water-quahty standards. Furthermore, virtually all states have at least proposed new toxics criteria for priority toxic pollutants since Section 303 (c) (2) (B) was added to the CWA in February of 1987. Unfortunately, not all such state proposals address, in a comprehensive manner, the requirements or Section 303 (c) (2) (B). For example, some states have proposed to adopt criteria to protect aquatic hfe, but not human health other states have proposed human health criteria that do not address major exposure pathways (such as the combination of both fish consumption and drinking water). In addition, in some cases final adoption or proposed state toxics criteria that would be approved by EPA has been substantially delayed due to controversial and difficult issues associated with the toxic pollutant criteria adoption process. 

Cationic flocculants are widely used in clearing oil-water, waste, natural and drinking water. At the sarue time they ar e moderately toxic substances which have cumulative properties. For the majority of flocculants, prodused and used in Ukraine, limit admission concentration is 0,l-t-0,4 mg/dm for drinking water and 0,01 mg/dm and less - for natural waters. 

Prepai ative isolation of nonvolatile and semivolatile organic compounds fractions (hydrophobic weak acids, hydrophobic weak bases, hydrophobic neutrals, humic and fulvic acids) from natural and drinking waters in optimal conditions was systematically investigated by solid-phase extraction method with porous polymer sorbents followed by isolation from general concentrate of antropogenic and/or toxic semivolatile compounds produced in chlorination and ozonation processes. 

If yourfacility has a permit to inject a waste containing the toxic chemical into Class 1 deep wells, enter the 12-digit Underground Injection Well Code (UlC) identification number assigned by EPA or by the State under the authority of the Sate Drinking Water Act. If your facility does not hold such a p>ermit(s), enter not applicable, NA, in Section 3.1 la. You are only required to provide the UlC number for wells that receive the toxic chemical being reported. 

---