Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Tight binding analysis

Because of the difficulties that have already been noted with respect to the transferability of empirical potentials for Si, there has been tremendous pressure to seek alternative schemes which are at once more accurate and still represent a reduction in the computational burden associated with first-principles calculations. In the context of Si in particular, a powerful alternative is offered by tight-binding analysis. Like in the case of the empirical potentials, there are a number of different schemes and fits, each with its own particular patriots and warriors. On the other hand, the basic ideas don t really differ from what has been spelled out in chaps. 3 and 4. [Pg.342]

Murphy (2004) has reported an in-depth analysis of simulations for various assay conditions using Morrison s equation for tight binding inhibitors. From these studies several recommendations emerge for optimizing conditions for the determination... [Pg.187]

Comparison with (3.156) shows that F(NBO) is intrinsically of significantly higher accuracy than h(HMO) for describing the actual pi interactions of benzene. Because F(nbo) js tjje fundamental starting point for localized NBO analysis of conjugafive interactions, we can conclude that the NBO donor-acceptor picture is inherently more accurate than that based on the Hiickel tight-binding approximation. [Pg.214]

Some inhibitors interact very slowly with the enzyme protein, and onset of inhibition thus exhibits time-dependence. These inhibitors are generally referred to as slow-binding inhibitors, and as slow tight-binding inhihitors if the potency of inhibition is extremely high. Analysis of these inhibitory mechanisms is complex because binding and dissociation rate constants may be determined in addition to values. Indeed, a complete analysis may require extensive use of specialized computer software, and the complexities of such analyses preclude their discussion in this chapter. However, the reader is directed to several publications from Morrison s laboratory if a slow-binding mechanism is suspected for an inhibitor of interest (Morrison, 1982 Morrison and Stone, 1985 Sculley and Morrison, 1986 Morrison and Walsh, 1988). [Pg.127]

Morrison JF, Stone SR. 1985. Approaches to the study and analysis of the inhibition of enzymes by slow- and tight-binding inhibitors. Comments Mol Cell Biophys 2 347. Morrison JF, Walsh CT. 1988. The behavior and significance of slow-binding enzyme inhibitors. Adv Enzymol Relat Areas Mol Biol 61 201. [Pg.132]

A graphical protocol for the analysis of tight-binding inhibitors of enzyme-catalyzed reactions (see figure) . ... [Pg.336]

Inhibition of enzyme activity by a chemical species that binds slowly and is tight-binding as well has a low dissociation constant). Such inhibitors require special kinetic analysis . The most common method of obtaining the inhibition parameters is by nonlinear regression analysis of the progress curves. [Pg.641]

For the tight binding of the transition state the binding surface of the enzyme must be complementary to the structure of the transition state, so that optimal interactions between the enzyme and the transition state are possible. This demand imphes that enzymes display a high affinity to molecules which are chemically similar to the transition state of the reaction. Complexes of such transition state analogues with enzymes are well suited for X-ray structure analysis to elucidate the structural principles of the active site and the catalytic mechanism. [Pg.90]

The formation and transport properties of a large polaron in DNA are discussed in detail by Conwell in a separate chapter of this volume. Further information about the competition of quantum charge delocalization and their localization due to solvation forces can be found in Sect. 10.1. In Sect. 10.1 we also compare a theoretical description of localization/delocalization processes with an approach used to study large polaron formation. Here we focus on the theoretical framework appropriate for analysis of the influence of solvent polarization on charge transport. A convenient method to treat this effect is based on the combination of a tight-binding model for electronic motion and linear response theory for polarization of the water surroundings. To be more specific, let us consider a sequence... [Pg.13]


See other pages where Tight binding analysis is mentioned: [Pg.73]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.231]    [Pg.354]    [Pg.360]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.1470]    [Pg.429]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.231]    [Pg.354]    [Pg.360]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.1470]    [Pg.429]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.188]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.190]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.283]    [Pg.252]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.575]    [Pg.677]    [Pg.232]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.331]    [Pg.331]    [Pg.100]   


SEARCH



Analysis binding

Tight-binding

© 2024 chempedia.info