Tight binding model

The general description of a metal is in terms of orbitals, which are eigenfunctions of energy and momentum. The total wave function is, in principle, a Slater determinant. The Swiss physicist Felix Bloch developed the general band model. 

To describe the band structure of metals, we use the approach employed above to describe the bonding in molecules. First, we consider a chain of two atoms. The result is the same as that obtained for a homonuclear diatomic molecule we find two energy levels, the lower one bonding and the upper one antibonding. Upon adding additional atoms, we obtain an additional energy level per added electron, until a continuous band arises (Fig. 6.9). To describe the electron band of a metal in a 

Each atom in the chain has an outer electron at an energy Eq and a number of deeper lying core levels, which we neglect in this approximation (Fig. 6.15). 

The total potential of the chain of atoms with mutual distances a can be described as the sum of the individual potentials from the atom as 

The total wave function of the chain is now constructed by forming a Linear Combination of the wave functions of the individual Atomic Orbitals as 

Neglecting edge effects at the end of the chain we have n(x) = n(x + fa), implying 

---

Flaas FI, Wang C Z, Fahnie M, Elsasser C and Flo K M 1998 Environment-dependent tight-binding model for molybdenum Phys. Rev. B 57 1461... 

Mercer J L Jr and Chou M Y 1994 Tight-binding model with intra-atomic matrix elements Phys. Rev. B 49 8506... 

Table 1 Relative energies per atom of several structures for each of the metals examined by the tight-binding model discussed in the text. The energy of the experimental ground state structure is arbitrarily set to zero. All energies are calculated at the equihbrium volume found by the tight-binding fit, and are expressed in mRy. Below the common name of eacli phase is its Struldtirberirht designation.

W. M. C. Foulkes and R. Haydock, Tight-Binding Models and Density Functional Theory, Phys. Rev. B 39 12520 (1989)... 

V. M. Rosato, M. Guillope and B. Legrand, Thermodynamical and Structural Properties of FCC Transition Metals using a Simple Tight-Binding Model, Phil. Mag. A 59 321 (1989)... 

By combining the results of the Newns-Andersons model and the considerations from the tight binding model it is now possible to explain a number of trends in surface reactivity. This has been done extensively by Norskov and coworkers and for a thorough review of this work we refer to B. Hammer and J.K. Norskov, Adv. Catal. 45 (2000) 71. We will discuss the adsorption of atoms and molecules in separate sections. 

Fig. 24 (a) 1,5-Dinitro-anthracene connected to two monoatomic gold electrodes. The Tight Binding model used to study this system is represented underneath, (b) Modifications of the MO induced by the rotation of the nitro groups... 

Fig. 3. The transmittance function and its variation with length for the tight binding model. For the two-site case, the exact result demonstrates the transmittance as a Lorentzian. However, for longer chains the transmittance (as in Fig. 2) varies weakly within the band, and drops quite sharply outside the band - this latter dependence dominates the overall transport in this region.

Chapter 2 introduces the band theory of solids. The main approach is via the tight binding model, seen as an extension of the molecular orbital theory familiar to chemists. Physicists more often develop the band model via the free electron theory, which is included here for completeness. This chapter also discusses electronic condnctivity in solids and in particular properties and applications of semiconductors. 

The formation and transport properties of a large polaron in DNA are discussed in detail by Conwell in a separate chapter of this volume. Further information about the competition of quantum charge delocalization and their localization due to solvation forces can be found in Sect. 10.1. In Sect. 10.1 we also compare a theoretical description of localization/delocalization processes with an approach used to study large polaron formation. Here we focus on the theoretical framework appropriate for analysis of the influence of solvent polarization on charge transport. A convenient method to treat this effect is based on the combination of a tight-binding model for electronic motion and linear response theory for polarization of the water surroundings. To be more specific, let us consider a sequence... 

A second concern for quantum mechanical models of electron-transfer is the level at which the model is constructed. There is a wide-range of possibilities, ranging from Hiickel and tight binding models which can be used for qualitative reasoning, to sophisticated ab initio methods. Likewise, time-dependent studies can be made with classical molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, or time-dependent quantum mechanical calculations. 

Rene Fournier is studying atomic clusters238 and transition metal complexes.239 He is using a combination of density functional methods, tight-binding models, and molecular simulations with empirical interaction potentials, as part of a research program designed to study materials by computations on simple model systems. 

Now let us consider the case, when the system of interest is coupled to two contacts (Fig. 2). We assume here that the contacts are also described by the tight-binding model and by the matrix GFs. Actually, the semi-infinite contacts should be described by the matrix of infinite dimension. We shall consider the semi-infinite contacts in the next section. 

Pi(t) are the electrical potentials of the leads, the index k is the wave vector, but can be considered as representing an other conserved quantum number, a is the spin index, but can be considered as a generalized channel number, describing e.g. different bands or subbands in semiconductors. Alternatively, the tight-binding model can be used also for the leads, then (186) should be considered as a result of the Fourier transformation. The leads are assumed to be noninteracting and equilibrium. 

The theoretical formalism for dealing with such a molecular device is the NEGF-DFT which has two different kinds of implementations. The implementation in [27,32,33] adopts a cluster approach in which the device scattering region (called extended molecule ) is calculated within DFT while the device leads are treated within tight-binding models. The main... 

Preliminary models of the surface topography, for example, can be determined by atomic-probe methods, ion-scattering, electron diffraction, or Auger spectroscopy. The chemical bonds of adsorbates can be estimated from infrared spectroscopy. The surface electronic structure is accessible by photoelectron emission techniques. In case the surface structure is known, its electronic structure has to be computed with sophisticated methods, where existing codes more and more rely on first principles density functional theory (DFT) [16-18], or, in case of tight-binding models [19], they obtain their parameters from a fit to DFT data [20]. The fit is not without ambiguities, since it is unknown whether the density of states used for the fit is really unique. 

The VP rate is calculated by a restricted (to vdW modes) RRKM theory. By assuming a tight binding model for the cluster transition state, the resulting expression for the VP rate constant is (Forst 1973 Gilbert and Smith 1990 Kelley and Bernstein 1986 Levine and Bernstein 1987 Pritchard 1984 Robinson and Holbrook 1972 Steinfeld et al. 1989),... 

Tight-Binding Model for Graphite Intercalation Compounds.228... 

The simplest model of the electronic structure of GICs can be obtained from the Jt-band structure of graphite on the basis of the Slonczewski-Weiss-McClure tight-binding model with the rigid band scheme. Here, the intercalate bands are superimposed on the graphite rc-bands, their relative... 

---