The Types of Molecular Interactions

The classification of pores is also based on the difference in the types of molecular interactions controlling adsorption in the different groups. That is, in micropores, the overlapping surface forces of opposing pore walls are predominant in mesopores, surface forces and capillary forces are significant, while for the macropores, the contribution of the pore walls to surface forces is very small [15,19],... 

It has been shown that the free energy of adhesion can be positive, negative, or zero, implying that van der Waals interactions can be attractive as well as repulsive [130,133,134]. While Eq. (14) can, strictly speaking, be expected to hold only for systems that interact by means of dispersion forces only, there are no restrictions on Eq. (15). Since this equation describes very well the fundamental patterns of the behavior of particles, including macromolecules, independent of the type of molecular interactions present, it was found to be convenient to define an "effective Hamaker coefficient that reflects the free energy of adhesion [130],... 

The coefficients Bn(T) are functions of temperature and depend on the type of molecular interaction between species i and /. They can be determined from molecular theory or by experiments on gas mixtures. If only pure-gas data are available, we may assume B, to be of the form... 

The following is a summary, based on Ref. 1, of the types of molecular interactions that are important in understanding the structure and phase behavior of surfaces and interfaces. Because they are multicomponent, the interactions in systems with surfaces and interfaces are often related to the interactions between molecules in a particular type of medium. This is particularly important for self-assembling systems composed of surfactants or polymers, where the interactions and the subsequent equilibrium structures are strongly influenced by the type of solvent. 

Weber and JoseP have proposed a detailed classification which takes account of host-guest species, the type of molecular interactions, the topology of the structure, and the host to guest ratio. This has enjoyed a measure of success, but there has not been universal acceptance. 

Lobmann et al. (2011) prepared co-amorphous binary blends of the two BCS class 2 drugs indomethacin and naproxen with the main aim to further investigate the type of molecular interactions in co-amorphous blends and their influence on recrystallization, dissolution and physicochemical properties. They were able to successfully produce co-amorphous blends at the molar ratios 2 1, 1 1, and 1 2 using quench cooling. Similar to the results obtained by Allespet al. (2009), naproxen showed poor physical stability in its pure amorphous form. However, in combination with indomethacin, stable co-amorphous single-phase systems could be obtained. 

For the design, however is imperative to evaluate the fundamental physical-chemical properties before trying to evolve a given IL structure for a piarticular application. For instance, the type of molecular interaction between cation and anion is determinant for physical-chemical properties such as melting temperature, glass transition temperature or conductivity. (Yoshida et al., 2007) Thus, numerous works have published about the... 

Table 3.4 Summary and Examples of the Types of Molecular Interactions... 

There are two ways in which the volume occupied by a sample can influence the Gibbs free energy of the system. One of these involves the average distance of separation between the molecules and therefore influences G through the energetics of molecular interactions. The second volume effect on G arises from the contribution of free-volume considerations. In Chap. 2 we described the molecular texture of the liquid state in terms of a model which allowed for vacancies or holes. The number and size of the holes influence G through entropy considerations. Each of these volume effects varies differently with changing temperature and each behaves differently on opposite sides of Tg. We shall call free volume that volume which makes the second type of contribution to G. 

Equation (1) can be viewed in an over-simplistic manner and it might be assumed that it would be relatively easy to calculate the retention volume of a solute from the distribution coefficient, which, in turn, could be calculated from a knowledge of the standard enthalpy and standard entropy of distribution. Unfortunately, these properties of a distribution system are bulk properties. They represent, in a single measurement, the net effect of a large number of different types of molecular interactions which, individually, are almost impossible to separately identify and assess quantitatively. 

The standard free energy can be divided up in two ways to explain the mechanism of retention. First, the portions of free energy can be allotted to specific types of molecular interaction that can occur between the solute molecules and the two phases. This approach will be considered later after the subject of molecular interactions has been discussed. The second requires that the molecule is divided into different parts and each part allotted a portion of the standard free energy. With this approach, the contributions made by different parts of the solvent molecule to retention can often be explained. This concept was suggested by Martin [4] many years ago, and can be used to relate molecular structure to solute retention. Initially, it is necessary to choose a molecular group that would be fairly ubiquitous and that could be used as the first building block to develop the correlation. The methylene group (CH2) is the... 

The theory of molecular interactions can become extremely involved and the mathematical manipulations very unwieldy. To facilitate the discussion, certain simplifying assumptions will be made. These assumptions will be inexact and the expressions given for both dispersive and polar forces will not be precise. However, they will be reasonably accurate and sufficiently so, to reveal those variables that control the different types of interaction. At a first approximation, the interaction energy, (Ud), involved with dispersive forces has been calculated to be... 

The effect of molecular interactions on the distribution coefficient of a solute has already been mentioned in Chapter 1. Molecular interactions are the direct effect of intermolecular forces between the solute and solvent molecules and the nature of these molecular forces will now be discussed in some detail. There are basically four types of molecular forces that can control the distribution coefficient of a solute between two phases. They are chemical forces, ionic forces, polar forces and dispersive forces. Hydrogen bonding is another type of molecular force that has been proposed, but for simplicity in this discussion, hydrogen bonding will be considered as the result of very strong polar forces. These four types of molecular forces that can occur between the solute and the two phases are those that the analyst must modify by choice of the phase system to achieve the necessary separation. Consequently, each type of molecular force enjoins some discussion. 

It was explained in the previous chapter that solute retention and, consequently, solute selectivity is accomplished in an LC column by exploiting three basic and different types of molecular interactions in the stationary phase those interactions were described as ionic, polar and dispersive. 

Thus, by careful choice of solvents, evoked by an understanding of the essential role played by the different types of molecular interactions in the chromatographic process, the solutes of interest cannot only be separated, but also eluted in a reasonable time. 

Interactive LC systems are those where solute retention is predominantly controlled by the relative strengths of the molecular interactions between solute molecules with those of the two phases. In such systems, exclusion and entropically driven interactions will be minor contributions to retention. The three basically different types of molecular interaction, dispersive, polar and ionic give rise to three subgroups, each subgroup representing a separation where one specific type of interaction dominates in the stationary phase and thus governs solute retention. The subgroups are as follows ... 

One important parameter in the solvent characterization is the solvent polarity, which can be defined in different ways [24]. Polarity is connected with solute-solvent interactions, and these depend on the solute. Thus, there are five types of molecular interactions ... 

The above discussion is not only appropriate to 1,2-difluoroethylene and 2-butene but to other systems as well. Indeed, the sigma orbital interaction patterns discussed above obtain in diverse molecules. These and other patterns, as well as the types of molecular systems to which they apply, are pictured in Scheme 1. 

In Section 3.1., we shall show that the dynamic model leads to an unambiguous determination of the type of nonbonded interactions involved while the static model may lead to erroneous predictions as a result of an ambiguous definition of the nature of a nonbonded interaction. The superiority of the dynamic model is due to the fact that nonbonded interactions affect bonded interactions and, thus, the change in an overall overlap population rather than the change of a specific overlap population between nonbonded atoms or groups is the most appropriate index of a nonbonded interaction. Accordingly, we shall employ the dynamic model in all subsequent discussions of molecular structure, unless otherwise stated. 

Binding of C02 takes place in aqueous medium by the carboxylation reaction of ribulose-diphosphate (RuDP) with the formation of 3-phospho-glycerine acid (PGA) - table 5. Water molecule and radical C=0 at the distances of molecular interaction have quite similar values of PE-parameters for forming the general structural grouping of dimeric composite type. Total PE-parameter of water molecule and radical C=0 hearly equals PE-parameter of C02 and therefore the molecules of C02 and H20 join RuBP with the formation of two radicals COOH b PGA (table 5). In ferment RuDP- carboxylase, Mg atoms and 0" ions (5.4867 eV and 4.755 eV) play an active role, their PE-parameters similar to PE-parameter of radical COOH. 

The theory of molecular interactions has been reviewed extensively in the past and many monographs and contributed volumes are available in this field. Three of them45-47) are especially recommended because they give the same kind of insight into the problems that is needed here. We do not intend to present an extensive discussion on the methods applied to intermolecular forces in this paper. The interested reader will be referred to some selected articles. Nevertheless it seems necessary at least to introduce the type of notation we prefer here and to stress some points that we feel to be important for a critical evaluation of the calculated results. 

Dimension of mechanism space also the number of steps (types of molecular interaction) in chemical system. 

Owing to the diverse chemical nature of functional groups in proteins and polysaccharides, they are prone to a variety of types of molecular interactions, both in bulk aqueous media and at air-water or oil-water interfaces. To a first approximation one may consider an adsorbed layer of biopolymers at the interface as simply a special type of highly concentrated biopolymer solution. Thus, the same variety of interactions that are typically found for biopolymers in a bulk aqueous media also occur in biopolymer adsorbed layers at the interfaces in food colloids. Moreover, these same molecular interactions are also involved in the close encounters between pairs of colloidal particles covered by adsorbed biopolymer layers. In the rest of this chapter we shall briefly remind ourselves of the main basic types of intermolecular interactions readers requiring more detailed background information are directed to other sources (Cantor and Schimmel, 1980 Lehninger, 1982 Israelachvili, 1992 Dickinson, 1998 Finkelstein and Ptitsyn, 2002 McClements, 2005, 2006 Min et al., 2008). 

---