The transition probability

Second, the product of the two potentials is zero throughout the entire space, 

The reference point of energy, the vacuum level, is well defined in the STM problem. The entire system is neutral. Therefore, at infinity, there is a well-defined vacuum potential. In the vicinity of the apex of the tip, the potential barrier in the gap is substantially lowered. However, the barrier lowering is confined in a small region near the tip end. Outside the interaction region, the potential in the space equals the vacuum level. This condition, Eq. (2.22), minimizes the error estimation term of Oppenheimer (1928). 

seen from Fig. 2.8, the potentials Us and Ut are different from the potentials of the free tip, t/m, and the free sample, Uso, respectively. The effect of the differences (Fi = f/so — Us and F, = Usa — Us), can be taken into account by time-independent perturbation methods. 

At t 0, Ur is turned off. The Schrodinger equation gives the stationary states of the sample  

On the other hand, the modified wavefunctions of the tip are defined by the following Schrodinger equation. 

---

This is the one dimensional version of what is usually called the Bom approximation in scattering theory. The transition probability obtained from equation A3.11.43() is... 

Typically, the ratio of this to the incident flux detennines the transition probability. This infonnation will be averaged over the energy range of the initial wavepacket, unless one wants to project out specific energies from the solution. This projection procedure is accomplished using the following expression for the energy resolved (tune-independent) wavefunction in tenns in tenns of its time-dependent counterpart ... 

The transition probability for absorption of two photons can be described in tenns of a two-photon cross section 5 by... 

It is only during an evolution (perhaps between sampling points in an FID) that these totals need be divided amongst the various lines in the spectmni. Therefore, one of the factors in the transition probability represents the conversion from preparation to evolution the other factor represents the conversion back from evolution to detection. 

Bain A D and Duns G J 1996 A unified approach to dynamic NMR based on a physical interpretation of the transition probability Can. J. Chem. 74 819-24... 

A consideration of the transition probabilities allows us to prove that microscopic reversibility holds, and that canonical ensemble averages are generated. This approach has greatly extended the range of simulations that can be perfonned. An early example was the preferential sampling of molecules near solutes [77], but more recently, as we shall see, polymer simulations have been greatly accelerated by tiiis method. 

The transition probabilities obtained due to the above two modified beat-ments of single-surface calculations need to be compared with those riansition probabilities obtained by two surface calculations that confirms the validity of these former heatments. 

The transition probability at a particular total energy (E ) from vibrational level i to / may be expressed as the ratio between the coiresponding outgoing and incoming quantities [71]... 

Stueckelberg derived a similar fomiula, but assumed that the energy gap is quadratic. As a result, electronic coherence effects enter the picture, and the transition probability oscillates (known as Stueckelberg oscillations) as the particle passes through the non-adiabatic region (see [204] for details). 

The transition probability R is related to selection mles in spectroscopy it is zero for a forbidden transition and non-zero for an allowed transition. By forbidden or allowed we shall mostly be referring to electric dipole selection mles (i.e. to transitions occurring through interaction with the electric vector of the radiation). 

As first shown by Caldeira and Leggett [1981], in the tunneling regime friction reduces the transition probability by the factor... 

For this reason these vibrations influence tunneling in an entirely different way. For a model in which the reactant and product valleys are represented by paraboloids with frequencies coq and transition probability has been found to be [Benderskii et al. 1991a, b]... 

In the time-dependent perturbation theory [Landau and Lifshitz 1981] the transition probability from the state 1 to 2 is related with the perturbation by the golden rule,... 

Jaquet and Miller [1985] have studied the transfer of hydrogen atom between neighbouring equilibrium positions on the (100) face of W by using a model two-dimensional chemosorption PES [McGreery and Wolken 1975]. In that calculation, performed for fairly high temperatures (T> rj the flux-flux formalism along with the vibrationally adiabatic approximation (section 3.6) were used. It has been noted that the increase of the coupling to the lattice vibrations and decrease of the frequency of the latter increase the transition probability. 

To proceed it is convenient to define the transition probability per time interval Tc as... 

Because A is held constant the transition probability associated with this step is... 

To specify these transition probabilities we make the further assumption that the residence time of a particle in a given adsorption site is much longer than the time of an individual transition to or from that state, either in exchange with the gas phase in adsorption and desorption or for hopping across the surface in diffusion. In such situtations there will be only one individual transition at any instant of time and the transition probabilities can be summed, one at a time, over all possible processes (adsorption, desorption, diffusion) and over all adsorption sites on the surface. To implement this we first write... 

The fact that detailed balance provides only half the number of constraints to fix the unknown coefficients in the transition probabilities is not really surprising considering that, if it would fix them all, then the static (lattice gas) Hamiltonian would dictate the kind of kinetics possible in the system. Again, this cannot be so because this Hamiltonian does not include the energy exchange dynamics between adsorbate and substrate. As a result, any functional relation between the A and D coefficients in (44) must be postulated ad hoc (or calculated from a microscopic Hamiltonian that accounts for couphng of the adsorbate to the lattice or electronic degrees of freedom of the substrate). Several scenarios have been discussed in the literature [57]. 

At each Monte Carlo step (MCS), either a dimer is formed from two adjacent monomers or a monomer is added or deleted from the chain end. The transition probabilities are... 

The transition probability —S)) represents the rate of state-change... 

Concerning the choice of the transition probabilities W, one has ample freedom to select the most appropriate one for a specific physical process. 

---