Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Test samples preparations

Test Preparation Prepare a solution from the test sample preparation such that 1 mL of the final dilution will contain between 0.15 and 0.65 lactase unit. Weigh, and quantitatively transfer the enzyme to a volumetric flask of appropriate size. Dissolve the enzyme in water, swirling gently, and dilute with water if necessary. [Pg.913]

No difference in Tg was found between test samples prepared from method A and B materials after opening the mould. Additional post-curing, i.e. 2 hours at 190°C, plus 2 hours at 210°C, plus 2 hours at 220°C causes the Tg rise shown in Table I. [Pg.411]

Cracks can be initiated during shrinkage, mechanical testing, sample preparation or SEM analysis. Therefore, all samples were prepared and handled in the same way. It is observed that the polymer strengthens the cement matrix and increases the internal cohesion. Similar observations are made by Muller using ultrasonic auscultation technique [10]. [Pg.27]

EN 302-6 (2004) [11] deals with determination of the conventional pressing time. Single lap test samples prepared with various pressing times at different temperature levels are tested according to EN 302-1 [2] until a failure strength exceeding 4 N/mm is found. [Pg.454]

Drug Purity Determination Stability Testing Dissolution Testing Sample Preparation Plant Extracts... [Pg.3594]

Figure 5.34 Infusion chromatograms covering the LC/MS assay time (2.5 minutes), obtained using the post-column infusion method shown in Figure 5.33, comparing the ability of different sample preparation methods to remove endogenous sample matrix components that interfere with the ionization of phenacetin. Panels (a) - (f) show the variation with time of the MS signed specific for the infused standard (phenacitin) following on-column injection of 10 p,L of a blank plasma sample prepared by one of the tested sample preparation methods, (a) Protein precipitation, (b) Oasis SPE. (c) Methyl-tertbutyl ether (MTBE) hquid-liquid extraction, (d) Empore C2 disk SPE. (e) Empore C8 disk SPE. (f) Empore Cl 8 disk SPE. Reproduced from Bonfigho, Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 13,1175 (1999), with permission of John Wiley Sons, Ltd. Figure 5.34 Infusion chromatograms covering the LC/MS assay time (2.5 minutes), obtained using the post-column infusion method shown in Figure 5.33, comparing the ability of different sample preparation methods to remove endogenous sample matrix components that interfere with the ionization of phenacetin. Panels (a) - (f) show the variation with time of the MS signed specific for the infused standard (phenacitin) following on-column injection of 10 p,L of a blank plasma sample prepared by one of the tested sample preparation methods, (a) Protein precipitation, (b) Oasis SPE. (c) Methyl-tertbutyl ether (MTBE) hquid-liquid extraction, (d) Empore C2 disk SPE. (e) Empore C8 disk SPE. (f) Empore Cl 8 disk SPE. Reproduced from Bonfigho, Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 13,1175 (1999), with permission of John Wiley Sons, Ltd.
Since the oxidation of thiols at mercury electrodes is facile and specific, it should be adaptable to HPLC detection. Rabenstein and Saetre" first reported this and so gave rise to a significant improvement in the assay of thiols in complex mixtures. Cysteine and other amino-thiols were separated on a cation-exchange column and detected at a mercury-pool EC detector (-1-0.05 V vs SCE) with a sensitivity of < 1 nmol for most of the thiols tested. Sample preparation consisted of little more than diluting a protein-free extract of a biolluid. These authors subsequently detailed many applications of this assay, e.g. D-penicillamine in blood and urine, cysteine and homocysteine in plasma and urine" and cysteine and glutathione in... [Pg.85]

In accordance with the Commission s 1995 Budget (Annex to PC-VIII/AAVP.7) the cost of participation, to include sample analysis, as well as, where applicable, the costs of sample preparation and evaluation of test results, will be borne by the participating laboratory or its Member State. The Secretariat may be able to offer some financial assistance in this regard in 1995, but it will be extremely limited. Test samples preparation and evaluation of test results will be the responsibility of the Secretariat, but may either be contracted out or provided by a Member State on a cost-free basis. If the sample preparation and the evaluation of test results are contracted out or are provided by a Member State, the relationship between the participating laboratories and the laboratories preparing samples and carrying out the evaluation of results should be open and transparent. [Pg.236]

An examination of the particle morphology in the test samples as a function of the flow direction in the injection molder in relation to the transverse direction indicated that the particles are longer in the flow direction when the polymer nanocomposites were prepared with the Werner and Pfleider extruders. This observation is commensurate with the preferred morphology of montmorillonite as an ellipsoid rather than a disk in the modeling studies above. The opposite orientation was observed with test samples prepared from the Haake and the DSM extruders. The difference in the shear elements of the three different extruders could be responsible for the differences in the anisotropic orientations of the montmorillonite particles in the polymer. [Pg.74]

A superior strategy to the above approach is provided by Cui and Paul [18]. The quality of this work is enhanced by the full description of the polymers that were utilized and the complete characterization of the composites that were prepared. The PP that was employed in this study was Pro-Fax PH020 manufactured by Basell. MAPP (PP-g-MA) was PB3200 provided by Cromption with a MA content of 1.0 wt.%. The diamine and montmorillonite (Cloisite Na) were identical to the ones utilized in the above study. Cloisite 20A was utilized as a control organomontmorillonite. This is a superior choice to the organomontmorillonite employed in the studies above. The composites were prepared with a DSM Micro 5 compounder. The test samples were prepared with a DSM microinjection molder. This is a superior protocol in relation to the compression-molded test samples prepared above. PP-g-MA was reacted directly with the diamine in a Brabender at 195°C and 50 r/min for 5.5 min. The amine... [Pg.110]

Undrained shear strength testing of cohesive material (e.g. clay) can be realised in the laboratory by means of the vane shear test or the triaxial test, type UU (Unconsolidated Undrained) or UCS (Unconfined Compression Strength) on undisturbed samples. In such triaxial tests, sample preparation and sample size may influence the results. [Pg.219]


See other pages where Test samples preparations is mentioned: [Pg.267]    [Pg.440]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.484]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.253]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.454]    [Pg.4327]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.223]    [Pg.818]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.117]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.222 ]




SEARCH



Designated laboratories test samples, preparation

Genetic testing sample preparation

Leaching test sample preparation

Preparation of samples for testing

Preparation of the Soil Sample Ready for Ecotoxicity Testing

Proficiency-testing sample preparation

Sample Preparation for Tests

Sample preparation for testing

Sample preparation water testing

Sample testing

Sampling testing

Test preparation

Test sample

Testing retrieved biotextile implants harvesting, test planning, sample preparation and cleaning

© 2024 chempedia.info