Failure strength

Strength (N) Wood failure (%) Strength (N) Wood failure (%) Strength (N) Wood failure (%)... 

The failure strength parameters F, G, H, L, M, and N were related to the usual failure strengths X, Y, and S for a lamina by Tsai [2-21]. If only x- 2 acts on the body, then, because its maximum value is S,... 

Considerable interaction exists between the failure strengths X, Y, S in the Tsai-Hili criterion, but none exists in the previous criteria where axial, transverse, and shear failures are presumed to occur independently. 

Strength can be measured in compression, in tension, in shear and transversely (flexural strength). However, if we exclude plastic flow as a means of failure, then materials can only fracture in one of two ways (1) by the pulling apart of planes of atoms, i.e. tensile failure, or (2) by the slippage of planes of atoms, i.e. shear failure. Strength is essentially a measure of fracture stress, which is the point of catastrophic and imcontrolled failure because the initiation of a crack takes place at excessive stress values. 

As expected, the residual extensibility of the fiber decreases at higher draw ratios. What is not so predictable is that the true stress at failure increases as the draw ratio increases fiber failure strength is improved by drawing the yarn. If a curve is drawn to connect the end points of the stress-strain curves, it is seen that there is an inverse relationship between tenacity and elongation to break (eb). The form of this relationship is as follows ... 

Polymerized epoxy adhesives are amorphous and highly crosslinked materials. This microstructure results in many useful properties such as high modulus and failure strength, low creep, and good chemical and heat resistance. However, the structure of epoxy resins also leads to one undesirable property—they are relatively brittle materials. As such, epoxy adhesives tend to have poor resistance to crack initiation and growth, which results in poor impact and peel properties. In sealant formulations, epoxy resins do not often provide the degree of elongation or movement that is required for many applications. 

The field boundaries (the heavy lines) are the loci of points at which two mechanisms have equal failure strength. 

We will discuss these fracture properties of disordered solids, modelled by the random percolation models, and concentrate on their statistics, given by the cumulative failure strength distribution F a) under stress a, and the most probable fracture strength erf of such samples. We will discuss separately the cases for weak disorder p 1) and strong disorder p Pc)-The scaling properties of <7f near p pc and the nature of the competition between the percolation and extreme statistics here, will be discussed in detail. 

The validity of these fracture strength distributions (3.18a) and (3.186) has not been checked yet extensively in experiments, as the above two forms differ very little numerically and require very accurate data for the failure strength distribution F a) for the analysis (see however the next subsection). Various accurate numerical simulation experiments have however been performed. 

The mechanical strength of highly porous ceramics like cylindrical silica extrudates were studied by van den Born et al. (1991). They measured the failure strength distribution F cr) for (four) different series of samples produced under different conditions, resulting in different porosity and other porometric parameters. The failure strength distribution F a) (for normalised constant sample volume) is shown in Fig. 3.13(a). The plot of A, as defined above in (3.23), against In a (in Fig. 3.13b) and 1/a (in Fig. 3.13c) shows that the fit with the Gumbel distribution (3.18b), with 1,... 

In this book, we try to present the basic concepts in order to understand the mechanical and electrical failures of solid materials containing inherent defects or disorders. Our emphasis has been on the question why , rather than on the question when , and we concentrate mainly on the statistical aspects of their failure strength distribution. 

Fig. 34.12 Variation of failure strength of single lap joints with respect to the weight fraction of thermally expansive particles.

Creep is the result of materials deforming when undergoing elevated temperatures and constant stress. Creep becomes a problem when the stress intensity is approaching the fracture failure strength. If the creep rate increases rapidly, the strain becomes so large that it could result in failure. The creep rate is controlled by minimizing the stress and temperature of a material. 

This criterion has been used widely and quite successfully in many cases but it is important to note that (1) it is more of a curve fit than a model accounting for acmal failure mechanisms in a composite and (2) it does not differentiate between tension and compression failure strength, which, in a composite, can have very different magnitudes. 

---