Test rules limitations

Early experimentation exploits new freedom that rebellion has grudgingly been granted. At least occasionally, the active and passive resistance have caused weary parents to relax their rules or back off their demands. With this success in mind, the early adolescent begins to test other limits and seeks to satisfy a growing curiosity about the world, particularly activities allowed to adults but forbidden to the young. 

Table 9.6 compares the residues from thermal waste treatment with respect to their long-term behavior. This assessment is usually made using leach tests in Table 9.6, the Swiss Technical Rule limits for residuals requiring a leach strength of pH 4 were used (Anonymous 1990 see Section 9.5.3). Tests have shown that the untreated and even the scrubbed electrostatic precipitator (ESP) filter residues do not meet these limits, and even the zinc content of ESP filter residue solidified with cement is only slightly below the limit at which landfilling would be permitted at a... 

However, in order to reliably ensure very long service lives of one hundred or even some hundred of years, extensive experience with the plastic material and results of various special long-term tests are needed as a rule. Limited field experience and pure model considerations alone are not sufficient in view of the complexity of the processes in order to obtain more than mere speculative considerations on long-term behaviour. 

This rule is justified by the need to limit the benzene emissions from evaporation (Tims, 1983) Figure 5.25 shows that emissions increase linearly with the benzene content of the fuel. It is noteworthy that current legislation limits the measured evaporation to 2 g per test conducted in accordance with a standard procedure (Sealed Housing for Evaporative Determination, or SHED). Yet for a fuel containing 5% benzene, an evaporation of 0.7 g benzene /test is observed. 

As part of TSCA, EPA can require the testing of any chemical if there is the possibiUty of an unreasonable risk to health or environment or if there is significant human or environmental exposure. If the substance poses an unreasonable risk, EPA can prohibit the manufacture, processing, or distribution of the substance limit the amount of the substance that can be manufactured, processed, or distributed prohibit a particular use for the substance limit the concentration of the substance during manufacture, processing, or distribution regulate disposal methods for the substance and require manufacturers to maintain records of process and to conduct tests to assure compliance with EPA rules. 

Hair colorants, the fourth class of color additives, may be used only to color scalp hair and may not be used in the area of the eye. Use of these colorants is exempt, that is, coal-tar hair dyes may be sold with cautionary labeling, directions for preliminary (patch) testing, and restrictions against use in or near the eye. The EDA diligently enforces the rules governing color additives and limits the use of, or even dehsts colorants deemed unsafe. The Hst of substances specifically prohibited for use in cosmetics is short. 

The principal limitation to using these rules is that the true process parameters are often unknown. Steady-state gain K can be calculated from a process model or determined from the steady-state results of a step test as Ac/Au, as shown in Fig. 8-28. The test will not be viable, however, if the time constant of the process is longer than a few... 

The development vehicle used to create and test the rule base must be as flexible as possible, allowing easy alterations and expansion of the rule base with whatever displays can convey the most information. The delivery vehicle, however, should be virtually transparent to the user, conveying only as much information as needed to solve the problem at hand. Self-tuning controllers can perform their task without explicitlv informing users, but their output and status is available on demanci, and their operation may be easily limited or interrupted. 

This knowledge is also important in order to determine if air tests conducted by OSHA compliance officers are valid. For example, if threshold limit value in the health standard is an 8-hour time-weighted average, the air sample should be obtained by sampling over the entire shift in the employee s breathing zone. It cannot be measured by a few short term samples, even if spaced over the full shift unless the worker is in a relatively fixed location with no variation in his work procedure or in the process. Such an event is generally the exception rather than the rule. 

The following information is presented as an aid when ehoosing a eon-traetor. This information was field tested and proven to be sueeessful over a period of several years. The reader may find that the following information needs to be adjusted in one or more ways to be eflfeetive. Number values and limitations eertainly vary from organization to organization. We do not believe that the information offered provides hard and fast rules but should be used as guiding general prineiples. 

Assuming the 1% limit was set down in full cognizance of the statistics involved, the system suitability test must be regarded as failed because 2.43 > 1.74. This would be the legalistic interpretation under GMP rules. Statistically it would have made more sense to select the criterion as St <0.01 Xmean VFc 0.05,ft, °°) for acceptance and demanding, say, u > 5 in this particular case, s, could have been as large as 3.6. 

The Production Department was not amused, because lower values had been expected. Quality Control was blamed for using an insensitive, unse-lective, and imprecise test, and thereby unnecessarily frightening top management. This outcome had been anticipated, and a better method, namely polarography, was already being set up. The same samples were run, this time in duplicate, with much the same results. A relative confidence interval of 25% was assumed. Because of increased specificity, there were now less doubts as to the amounts of this particular heavy metal that were actually present. To rule out artifacts, the four samples were sent to outside laboratories to do repeat tests with different methods X-ray fluorescence (XRFi °) and inductively coupled plasma spectrometry (ICP). The confidence limits were determined to be 10% resp. 3%. Figure 4.23 summarizes the results. Because each method has its own specificity pattern, and is subject to intrinsic artifacts, a direct statistical comparison cannot be performed without first correcting the apparent concentrations in order to obtain presumably true... 

Waste water rules have pH limits, a common range being between 6 and 10. There are also limits for fats and oils, solvents, heavy metals, and a variety of other compounds and ions. The fact that a compound with possible toxic or otherwise undesirable properties is not on the list does not mean it is permissible. Such a matter should be discussed with the proper authorities. The discharged water may also have to pass a test for toxicity to aquatic animals. As one frustrated manager of a chemical plant put it We can no longer put anything but pure tap water into the sewer Of course, it is not really that bad, but some of the requirements often come as a surprise. 

Waste water rules sometimes require that water conform to the limitations at all times. Under such rules, surges of non-conforming sewage are not permitted. Tests run on composite samples over a 24-hour period, for example, will then not be acceptable. 

---