Table for Evaluation Using Analysis Technique

Measurement of the EMF change upon addition of a standard solution to the sample solution (according to Orion). 

The table assumes that measurements are carried out at 25°C, that 100 ml of sample solution are used and that 10 ml of a 10-fold more concentrated standard solution are added. The theoretical electrode slope is assumed. For cations the NE values should have the opposite sign and for divalent ions the hE values should be doubled. The concentration of measured ion in the sample solution is obtained by multiplying the appropriate standard solution concentration by the factor f corresponding to the measured AE 

---

To produce the seismic analysis model for the reactor internal structures, the lumped-mass modeling technique is used From the 3-dimensional finite element model of KALIMER reactor internal structures, the detail local stiffness analyses are performed to construct the lumped-mass seismic analysis model The seismic analysis and evaluation of KALIMER are presented through the modal analysis, the seismic time history analvsis, and the equivalent seismic stiess analysis Table 3 shows the natural frequencies of the reactor structures resulted from the modal analysis for the seismic analysis model shown in Fig 13... 

Due to their simplicity of construction and use and the relatively sharp cut-off characteristics, cascade impactors have been widely used for the size classification and size-classified chemical analysis of aerosols. Table 6.1 lists the most important integrating sampling methods with their main characteristics. Table 6.2 gives the most important differential, size-resolving methods used to sample and measure atmospherie aerosol particles. The section of the particle size distribution and the modes that dominate the sensitivity of the methods are indicated. The upper and lower size limits are nominal values for the most commonly used forms of the techniques. Cost, complexity of operational requirements, calibration problems, and the demands of the particular evaluation to be used also affect the choice of methods. For example, chemical analysis usually requires that a sample be collected, then taken to the evaluation device. 

The values of the engineering hot spot factors and all the subfactors for the coolant temperature rise and the cladding surface temperature rise are shown in Table 2.13 [27]. The subfactors are treated as 3cr statistical factors and most of them are evaluated from the typical data of the preliminary work as well as other designs. Some of the values of these subfactors of the Super LWR are different from those of the past preliminary work for the high-temperature supercritical-pressure fast reactor (SCFR-H), such as the subfactors of nuclear data, fissile content, and subchannel area. Among all the subfactors, the subchannel area subfactor is the most important and most sensitive one, and it is evaluated using a Monte Carlo technique and a subchannel analysis. This is discussed later. 

The first part of the book eonsists of a detailed treatment of the fundamentals of thin-layer ehromatography, and of measurement techniques and apparatus for the qualitative and quantitative evaluation of thin-layer ehromatograms. In situ preehromatographie derivatization teehniques used to improve the selectivity of the separation, to inerease the sensitivity of deteetion, and to enhanee the precision of the subsequent quantitative analysis are summarized in numerous tables. 

Once the pure mineral powders characterized, 3 mixtures were manually prepared and named ML1, ML2 and ML3. They contain each of the 8 minerals in different proportions reproducing 3 mine tailings falling in the uncertainty zone of the static test used. The 3 synthetic tailings were characterized with the same techniques as for the pure minerals. Cp and Sp weight fractions were evaluated from their chemical element tracers (respectively Cu and Zn) obtained from ICP-AES analysis. Qz, Dol, and Sid samples are considered pure and their percentages in the mixtures are not corrected. Table 1 presents the fraction of each mineral in the three mixtures before and after correction taking into consideration the contamination of Po sample by pyrite and calcite, as previously determined. The corrected mineral proportions are used for calculation of the static test parameters based on... 

---