System suitability test parameters robustness testing

System suitability. During the robustness testing of method validation, critical method parameters such as mobile phase composition and column temperature are varied to mimic the day-to-day variability. Therefore, the system suitability results from these robustness experiments should reflect the expected range for the system suitability results. As a result, system suitability results in these method validation experiments are very useful in determining the system suitability... 

The validation of an analytical procedure produces performance parameters of a well-behaved and well-conditioned system/instrument (including defined variations) which are more or less snapshots of the combination procedure/system. In order to routinely confirm the suitability of the integrated measurement instrumentation used with a given procedure, system suitability test parameters should be defined on the basis of the validation results and robustness studies. Larger variations under routine conditions or multiple laboratories should also be taken into consideration. 

The responses of main interest also are different in method development and robustness testing. In development, the considered responses are related to the quality of the separation (l),such as, for electrophoretic methods, migration times, peak shapes, and the resolutions between neighboring peaks. When the separation is optimized and the method is validated, thus also in robustness testing, the responses of main interest are related to the quantitative aspects of the method, such as contents, concentrations, or recoveries. The responses considered during development occasionally are considered in a second instance, for example, as system suitability test (SST) parameters. 

Once the appropriate dissolution conditions have been established, the method should be validated for linearity, accuracy, precision, specificity, and robustness/ruggedness. This section will discuss these parameters only in relation to issues unique to dissolution testing. All dissolution testing must be performed on a calibrated dissolution apparatus meeting the mechanical and system suitability standards specified in the appropriate compendia. 

The evaluation of robustness should be considered in the development of the assay and will depend on the type of procedure under development. It must show the reliability of a method with respect to deliberate variations in method parameters. If measurements are susceptible to variations in analytical conditions, the analytical conditions should be suitably controlled or a precautionary statement might be included in the procedure. One consequence of the evaluation of robustness may be that a series of system suitability parameters is established to ensure that the validity of the analytical procedure is maintained whenever used. Typical parameters to be tested would be the following sample concentration, sample stability, labeling variability (if applicable), injection variability, reagent lot-to-lot variability, and capillary vendor. 

If analytical measurements are susceptible to variations in the analysis parameters or sample preparation conditions, the method must be suitably controlled or a precautionary statement must be included in the written procedure that alerts the chemist to the susceptibility. The method s system suitability parameters should be defined in such a way that meeting all system suitability criteria would ensure that the method is currently being performed within the acceptance window provided by validation robustness testing. 

In addition to validation of the automation, full validation of the chromatographic procedure, as described in Chapter 12, should be conducted for late-phase methods. This should include specification of system suitability parameters to ensure that the performance obtained during method development and validation is maintained during routine use. The system suitability parameters may include specification of acceptable injection repeatability, criteria for resolution between critical pairs, maximum allowable tailing factors, and a means of verifying that the requisite sensitivity is obtained. As recommended by Vander Heyden et al., system suitability limits are best set following robustness tests. 

The optimization and validation of immunoassays for immunogenicity (ADA) testing has been described in detail in several publications [9,14,33,34]. In this section, we will describe the evaluation of relevant performance characteristics (validation parameters) that require the most effort. Some of these are different from the validation of traditional bioanalytical pharmacokinetic (PK) methods for macromolecules [35 37]. Precision, specificity, robustness, and ruggedness are determined similarly between ADA and PK methods. However, recovery/accuracy, sensitivity, stability, linearity, system suitability controls, and selectivity are treated differently between these two types of assays. 

All critical steps, method parameters or restrictions for any aspect of the stepwise procedure that may have been established during method robustness testing (Section 9.8.4) should also be described in the appropriate section of the procedure. If any special test injections or system suitability procedures have been established (Section 9.8.3) a detailed description of these procedures, along with instructions and examples for the preparation of any reqnired test solutions, should be described. 

---