System development steps develop methods

The final step of method development is validation of the HPLC method. Optimisation of chromatographic selectivity [110], performance verification testing of HPLC equipment [591], validation of computerised LC systems [592] and validation of analysis results using HPLC-PDA [34] were reported. The feasibility of automated validation of HPLC methods has been demonstrated [593]. Interlaboratory transfer of HPLC methods has been described [594]. 

The addition of the secondary antibody step allows for signal amplification of the process. However, for low density antigens (>2 K, < 10 K molecules/cell) it is recommended to employ further amplification of the immunocytochemical signal with tyramide, with ABC method or with polymer-conjugated technology such as EnVision System developed by DakoCytomation (see Sect. 6.2). 

We need to develop methods to understand trends for complex reactions with many reaction steps. This should preferentially be done by developing models to understand trends, since it will be extremely difficult to perform experiments or DFT calculations for all systems of interest. Many catalysts are not metallic, and we need to develop the concepts that have allowed us to understand and develop models for trends in reactions on transition metal surfaces to other classes of surfaces oxides, carbides, nitrides, and sulfides. It would also be extremely interesting to develop the concepts that would allow us to understand the relationships between heterogeneous catalysis and homogeneous catalysis or enzyme catalysis. Finally, the theoretical methods need further development. The level of accuracy is now so that we can describe some trends in reactivity for transition metals, but a higher accuracy is needed to describe the finer details including possibly catalyst selectivity. The reliable description of some oxides and other insulators may also not be possible unless the theoretical methods to treat exchange and correlation effects are further improved. 

It is a key step to develop methods to separate peptides with different molecular weights. An ultrafiltration membrane system equipped with the appropriate molecular weight cutoff has been effectively used in separating peptides having desired molecular weights (Jeon et al., 2000). In order to obtain functionally active peptides, it is a common method to use the type of enzymes letting sequential enzymatic digestions. 

In this chapter we attempt to present an organized approach to method development in SFC, with most of our emphasis on step 6, the optimization of the separation. Although a detailed discussion of sample characterization (step 1) and system selection (steps 2-4) is beyond our present scope, we have included for the novice a brief summary of the choices available for columns, stationary phases, mobile phases, sample introduction, and detection at the beginning of this chapter. We assume the reader is familiar with the basics of SFC if not, numerous reviews and monographs are available (1-5). 

Derivation of Reaction Schemes Based on Experimental Results. Although numerous methods for evaluating reactions schemes have been developed ( 0-44), most of them (40-42) start with a hypothetical mechanism which is, by means of experiments, either confirmed or rejected. A newly developed method for the systematic elucidation of reaction schemes of complex systems requires no chemical considerations, but concentration-time measurements and system-analytical considerations (45). The method is based on the initial slope of the concentration-time profiles and when necessary the higher derivatives of these curves at t = 0. Reaction steps in which products are formed directly from reactants can be identified in a concentration-time plot by a positive gradient c. at t = 0 (zero order delay). dtJ... 

Diffuslonal interaction methods. These calculate component efficiencies, but account for diffusional interactions. The calculation procedure is based on the Maxwell-Stefan diffusion equations, as developed by Krishna et al. (200,201). The equations are complex and are presented in the original reference. Lockett (12) has an excellent summary. For a ternary system, the steps below are followed (12) ... 

Obviously, the above algorithms are not suitable when transients of the finer scale model are involved (Raimondeau and Vlachos, 2000), as, for example, during startup, shut down, or at a short time after perturbations in macroscopic variables have occurred. The third coupling algorithm attempts fully dynamic, simultaneous solution of the two models where one passes information back and forth at each time step. This method is computationally more intensive, since it involves continuous calls of the microscopic code but eliminates the need for a priori development of accurate surfaces. As a result, it does not suffer from the problem of accuracy as this is taken care of on-the-fly. In dynamic simulation, one could take advantage of the fast relaxation of a finer (microscopic) model. What the separation of time scales between finer and coarser scale models implies is that in each (macroscopic) time step of the coarse model, one could solve the fine scale model for short (microscopic) time intervals only and pass the information into the coarse model. These ideas have been discussed for model systems in Gear and Kevrekidis (2003), Vanden-Eijnden (2003), and Weinan et al. (2003) but have not been implemented yet in realistic MC simulations. The term projective method was introduced for a specific implementation of this approach (Gear and Kevrekidis, 2003). 

An elegant, general solution for first-order networks has been provided in a classic publication by Wei and Prater [22]. In essence, the mathematics are developed for a reaction system with any number of participants that are all connected with one another by direct first-order pathways. For example, in a system with five participants, each of these can undergo four reactions, for a total of twenty first-order steps. Matrix methods are used to obtain concentration histories in constant-volume batch reactions, and a procedure is described for determination of all rate coefficients from such batch... 

The first step in method development is selecting an adequate HPLC mode for the particular sample. This choice depends on the character of the sample compounds, which can be either neutral (hydrophilic or lipophilic) or ionic, low-molecular (up to 2000 Da) or macromolecular (biopolymers or synthetic polymers). Many neutral compounds can be separated either by reversed-phase or by normal-phase chromatography, but a reversed-phase system without ionic additives to the aqueous-organic mobile phase is usually the best first choice. Strongly lipophilic samples often can be separated either by non-aqueous reversed-pha.se chromatography or by normal-phase chromatography. Positional isomers are usually better separated by normal-phase than by reversed-phase chromatography and the separation of optical isomers (enantiomers) requires either special chiral columns or addition of a chiral selector to the mobile phase. 

The third class of dry-developable resists involves heating the exposed resist films in a development step. This development method does not require expensive etching tools, is therefore economical, and could alleviate the potential problem of exposure tool contamination associated with the self-developing resist systems. Many of the plasma-developable resist systems involving a relief-bake step, as discussed in Section 3.2.4.1, have the thermal development characteristics to a certain extent. In the thermally developable resist scheme, development is minimal during irradiation but completed to the substrate upon postbaking. 

It is anticipated that integrated workstations will be developed that incorporate all of the steps of a method in one system, thus reducing the burden on the laboratory scientist to integrate the system and placing the emphasis on generating results, rather than developing methods. 

Processing Characteristics of IQAP. To follow the experts methodology, it appears that the processing within IQAP will be performed in two steps. In the first step, the inputs should be accepted and a constraint-based system will develop a set of constraints and limits that apply to the data. The knowledge embedded in this first system will convert the constraints into an analytical method and the associated set of QC criteria. It is expected that because QA/QC Objectives incorporate considerations regarding the usability of the data, the constraints will be flexible enough to process the inputs into a reasonably structured set of data tables. Therefore, in the second step, the method and its associated QC criteria will be represented in a relational database. The level of detail in the specifications of the QC criteria and the relationships between the data elements will be more specific as the process proceeds from the first step to the second step. 

The next step in method development is the solubilization of the sample. The first solvent that is always tried is distilled/or deionized water, although the type of solvent is determined by the analytical method that has been chosen. There are some solid substances that must first be desegregated. They cannot be dissolved in any other way in any of the solvents. The best quality and reliability can be obtained in this step by utilization of a micro-wave digestion system.332 This system of desegregation produces the minimum contamination of the sample. Usually, the solvents and reagents used for desegregation of solids also constitute the blank for the analysis. 

---