Symmetry factor relation

P is a symmetry factor equal to the fraction of the potential that promotes the cathodic reaction. The reaction rate and current are related through Faraday s law... 

The phrase symmetry adapted basis functions refers to those linear combinations of basis functions (on several atoms) that transform like the particular irreducible representation of the appropriate point group. Molecular symmetry is used at various points in these calculations twenty years ago I would have had to write several chapters on molecular symmetry, point groups, constructing symmetry-adapted combinations of basis functions, factoring a Hamiltonian matrix using symmetry and related topics. The point is that twenty... 

Important parameters involved in the Volmer-Butler equation are the transfer coefficients a and (1. They are closely related to the Bronsted relation [Eq. (14.5)] and can be rationalized in terms of the slopes of the potential energy surfaces [Eq. (14.9)]. Due to the latter, the transfer coefficients a and P are also called symmetry factors since they are related to the symmetry of the transitional configuration with respect to the initial and final configurations. 

As follows from the Bronsted relationship, the symmetry factors for the cathode and anode processes are related to each other [see Eq. (6.17a)] ... 

Equation (34.32) is remarkable in the relation that it shows that (1) the observable symmetry factor is determined by occupation of the electron energy level in the metal, giving the major contribution to the current, and (2) that the observable symmetry factor does not leave the interval of values between 0 and 1. The latter means that one cannot observe the inverted region in a traditional electrochemical experiment. Equation (34.32) shows that in the normal region (where a bs is close to ) the energy levels near the Fermi level provide the main contribution to the current, whereas in the activationless (a bs 0) and barrierless (a bs 1) regions, the energy levels below and above the Fermi level, respectively, play the major role. 

The first term in (13), also called the diagonal term (Berry 1985), originates from periodic orbit pairs (p,p ) related through cyclic permutations of the vertex symbol code. There are typically n orbits of that kind and all these orbits have the same amplitude A and phase L. The corresponding periodic orbit pair contributions is (in general) g n - times degenerate where n is the length of the orbit and g is a symmetry factor (g = 2 for time reversal symmetry). 

The symmetry factor P is obviously a central entity in electrodics and a fundamental quantity in the theoretical treatment of charge transfer at surfaces, particularly in relating electrode kinetics to solid-state physics. 

When the symmetry factor was introduced by Volmer and Erdey-Gruz in 1930, it was thought to be a simple matter of the fraction of the potential that helps or hinders the transfer of an ion to or from the electrode (Section 7.2). A more molecularly oriented version of the effect of P upon reaction rate was introduced by Butler, who was the first to apply Morse-curve-type thinking to the dependence of theenergy-dis -tance relation in respect to nonsolvent and metal—hydrogen bonds. 

It should be noted that the displacement coordinates have been labeled and then combined into the -type symmetry coordinates in a particular way. The angles have been indexed so that 0, is opposite to rh This assures that 0, and the change therein, A0 are related to the molecular symmetry elements in the same way as are r, and Ar,. Then, when the SALCs are written, A0, and Ar, occupy corresponding positions in the expressions. Unless this is done the symmetry factorization will not work out. 

The main catalytic influence of the nature of the electrode material is through the adsorption of intermediates of complex electrode reactions. Hortiuti and Polanyi [58] suggested that the activation energy of an electrode reaction should be related to the heat of adsorption of adsorbed intermediates by a relationship of the form of the Br0nsted rule in homogeneous solutions. This corresponds to a vertical shift of the potential energy curves by an amount j3Aif°ds with (5 a symmetry factor as discussed in Sect. 6.4 and depicted in Fig. 12. 

The chromatographic system and conditions described under Related Substances are used. The test is not valid unless in the chromatogram obtained with solution (3), the resolution factor between the peaks due to nimodipine and nimodipine impurity A is not less than 1.5, and the symmetry factor due to nimodipine is not less than 2. 

But the symmetry factor p has been defined strictly for a single step and is related to the shape of the free-energy barrier and to the position of the activated complex along the reaction coordinate. To describe a multi step process, p must be replaced by an experimental parameter, which we call the cathodic transfer coefficient a. Instead of Eq. 41E we then write ... 

Note that the transfer coefficient obtained here is not in any way related to the symmetry factor. It follows from the quasi-equilibrium assumption and should therefore be a true constant, independent of potential and temperature, as long as the assumptions leading to Eq. 43F are valid. 

Earlier we suggested the possibility that the symmetry factor used in relation to the variation of the standard free energy of adsorption with coverage (cf. Eq. 171) may not be identical to the symmetry factor defined in terms of the variation of AG° with potential (Eq. 5D). To see the consequence of a difference between the two, let us introduce for the moment a different symmetry factor, p in Eq. 171. The rate equation for the atom-ion recombination step (Eq. 211) will be written as follows ... 

First, the variation in the intrinsic barriers, AG, for related electrochemical reactions can be expected to be closely similar to those for the same series of homogeneous reactions using a fixed coreactant. If the comparison is made at a fixed electrode potential, E, the (often unknown) driving-force terms cancel provided that the free-energy profiles are symmetrical (the symmetry factor a. = 0.5) so that ... 

Electrocatalytic reactions often involve several elementary steps some of which are not necessarily electrochemical. The transfer coefficient is, then, related to the symmetry factor of an electron transfer rate-determining step (rds) through (74)... 

In the original treatment of Gurney/ the current was expressed as the integral of the product of electrolyte and electron energy distribution functions but with the electronic one written as a Boltzmann factor, exp( A /fcT). The symmetry factor was introduced intuitively in terms of the shift of intersection point of energy profiles in relation to change of electrode potential, i.e., of the Fermi-level energy (cf. Butler ). 

Chapter 2, by B. E. Conway, deals with a curious fundamental but hitherto little-examined problem in electrode kinetics the real form of the Tafel equation with regard to the temperature dependence of the Tafel-slope parameter 6, conventionally written as fe = RT/ aF where a is a transfer coefficient. He shows, extending his 1970 paper and earlier works of others, that this form of the relation for b rarely represents the experimental behavior for a variety of reactions over any appreciable temperature range. Rather, b is of the form RT/(aH + ctsT)F or RT/a F + X, where and as are enthalpy and entropy components of the transfer coefficient (or symmetry factor for a one-step electron transfer reaction), and X is a temperature-independent parameter, the apparent limiting... 

The quantity j0 is the exchange current density and is related to the kinetics of the electrochemical reactions considered and the local concentration of the reactants. It also depends on the electrode material. The parameter a is the symmetry factor and typically has a value of around 0.5. The Butler—Volmer... 

---