Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Surfactants system structure

P. Sakya, J. M. Seddon, R. H. Templer, R. J. Mirkin, G. J. T. Tiddy. Micellar cubic phases and their structural relationships the nonionic surfactant system Ci2EOi2/water. Langmuir 75 3706-3714, 1997. [Pg.742]

Lu B, Zheng Y, Scriven LE, Davis HT, Talmon Y, Zakin JL (1998) Effect of variation counterion-to-surfactant ratio on rheology and micro-structures of drag reducing cationic surfactant systems. Rheol Acta 37 528-548... [Pg.95]

Figure 6.4. Schematic phase diagram for a three-component (oil, water, surfactant) system showing some of the self-assembled structures which form in the various regions. Figure 6.4. Schematic phase diagram for a three-component (oil, water, surfactant) system showing some of the self-assembled structures which form in the various regions.
Surfactants employed for w/o-ME formation, listed in Table 1, are more lipophilic than those employed in aqueous systems, e.g., for micelles or oil-in-water emulsions, having a hydrophilic-lipophilic balance (HLB) value of around 8-11 [4-40]. The most commonly employed surfactant for w/o-ME formation is Aerosol-OT, or AOT [sodium bis(2-ethylhexyl) sulfosuccinate], containing an anionic sulfonate headgroup and two hydrocarbon tails. Common cationic surfactants, such as cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) and trioctylmethyl ammonium bromide (TOMAC), have also fulfilled this purpose however, cosurfactants (e.g., fatty alcohols, such as 1-butanol or 1-octanol) must be added for a monophasic w/o-ME (Winsor IV) system to occur. Nonionic and mixed ionic-nonionic surfactant systems have received a great deal of attention recently because they are more biocompatible and they promote less inactivation of biomolecules compared to ionic surfactants. Surfactants with two or more hydrophobic tail groups of different lengths frequently form w/o-MEs more readily than one-tailed surfactants without the requirement of cosurfactant, perhaps because of their wedge-shaped molecular structure [17,41]. [Pg.472]

When the variation of any colligative property of a surfactant in aqueous solution is examined, two types of behavior are apparent. At low concentrations, properties approximate those to be expected from ideal behavior. However, at a concentration value that is characteristic for a given surfactant system (critical micelle concentration, CMC), an abrupt deviation from such behavior is observed. At concentrations above the CMC, molecular aggregates called micelles are formed. By increasing the concentration of the surfactant, depending on the chemical and physical nature of the molecule, structural changes to a more... [Pg.256]

The assessment of surfactant structures and optimal mixtures for potential use in tertiary flooding strategies in North Sea fields has been examined from fundamental investigations using pure oils. The present study furthermore addresses the physico-chemical problems associated with reservoir oils and how the phase performance of these systems may be correlated with model oils, including the use of toluene and cyclohexane in stock tank oils to produce synthetic live reservoir crudes. Any dependence of surfactant molecular structure on the observed phase properties of proposed oils of equivalent alkane carbon number (EACN) would render simulated live oils as unrepresentative. [Pg.307]

The EACN values for toluene were found to vary depending upon the nature of the surfactant molecular structure, but sulphonate systems confirm an EACN equivalence of 0. [Pg.326]

In what follows we will discuss systems with internal surfaces, ordered surfaces, topological transformations, and dynamical scaling. In Section II we shall show specific examples of mesoscopic systems with special attention devoted to the surfaces in the system—that is, periodic surfaces in surfactant systems, periodic surfaces in diblock copolymers, bicontinuous disordered interfaces in spinodally decomposing blends, ordered charge density wave patterns in electron liquids, and dissipative structures in reaction-diffusion systems. In Section III we will present the detailed theory of morphological measures the Euler characteristic, the Gaussian and mean curvatures, and so on. In fact, Sections II and III can be read independently because Section II shows specific models while Section III is devoted to the numerical and analytical computations of the surface characteristics. In a sense, Section III is robust that is, the methods presented in Section III apply to a variety of systems, not only the systems shown as examples in Section II. Brief conclusions are presented in Section IV. [Pg.143]

In binary mixtures of water, surfactants, or lipids the most common structure is the gyroid one, G, existing usually on the phase diagram between the hexagonal and lamellar mesophases. This structure has been observed in a very large number of surfactant systems [13-16,24—27] and in the computer simulations of surfactant systems [28], The G phase is found at rather high surfactant concentrations, usually much above 50% by weight. [Pg.147]

Furthermore, Oda et al. pointed out that there are two topologically distinct types of chiral bilayers, as shown in Figure 5.46.165 Helical ribbons (helix A) have cylindrical curvature with an inner face and an outer face and are the precursors of tubules. These are, for example, the same structures that are observed in the diacetylenic lipid systems discussed in Section 4.1. By contrast, twisted ribbons (helix B) have Gaussian saddlelike curvature, with two equally curved faces and a C2 symmetry axis. They are similar to the aldonamide and peptide ribbons discussed in Sections 2 and 3, respectively. The twisted ribbons in the tartrate-gemini surfactant system were found to be stable in water for alkyl chains with 14-16 carbons. Only micelles form... [Pg.340]

Performance indices only point out the general direction for the product formulation. For more specific information required in the formulation process, heuristics are usually used to choose the appropriate product form, surfactant system, and additives. This step aims at choosing the appropriate product formulation, namely the product form with the right materials (surfactant system and additives) and product structure, to bring about the quality factors previously mentioned. [Pg.244]

Among the purposes of this paper is to report the results of calorimetric measurements of the heats of micellar mixing in some nonideal surfactant systems. Here, attention is focused on interactions of alkyl ethoxylate nonionics with alkyl sulfate and alkyl ethoxylate sulfate surfactants. The use of calorimetry as an alternative technique for the determination of the cmc s of mixed surfactant systems is also demonstrated. Besides providing a direct measurement of the effect of the surfactant structure on the heats of micellar mixing, calorimetric results can also be compared with nonideal mixing theory. This allows the appropriateness of the regular solution approximation used in models of mixed micellization to be assessed. [Pg.142]

Calorimetric measurements can be used to obtain heats of mixing between different surfactant components in nonideal mixed micelles and assess the effects of surfactant structure on the thermodynamics of mixed micellization. Calorimetry can also be successfully applied in measuring the erne s of nonideal mixed surfactant systems. The results of such measurements show that alkyl ethoxylate sulfate surfactants exhibit smaller deviations from ideality and interact significantly less strongly with alkyl ethoxylate nonionics than alkyl sulfates. [Pg.150]

A paper contributed by J. E. Desnoyers, R. Beaudoin, C. Roux, and C. Perron described the use of microemulsions as a possible tool for the extraction of oil from tar sands. Using a technique called flow microcalorimetry recently developed at the University of Sherbrooke, these researchers studied the structure and stability of organic microphases in aqueous media. These microphases can be stabilized by surfactants and can dissolve large quantities of oil. In a similar vein, D. F. Gerson, J. E. Zajic, and M. D. Ouchi (University of Western Ontario) described the extraction of bitumen from Athabasca tar sands by a combined solvent-aqueous-surfactant system. [Pg.2]

In the remainder of this article, discussion of surfactant dissolution mechanisms and rates proceeds from the simplest case of pure nonionic surfactants to nonionic surfactant mixtures, mixtures of nonionics with anionics, and finally to development of myehnic figures during dissolution, with emphasis on studies in one anionic surfactant/water system. Not considered here are studies of rates of transformation between individual phases or aggregate structures in surfactant systems, e.g., between micelles and vesicles. Reviews of these phenomena, which include some of the information summarized below, have been given elsewhere [7,15,29]. [Pg.5]

Some miscellaneous examples of QD synthesis using surfactant systems are described below. A layer-by-layer [206] structure of dithiol self-assembled monolayers (SAM) and CdS mono- and multilayer nanoparticles were fabricated on a gold substrate covered with alkanedithiol. SAMs were formed by an alternate immersion of the substrate into ethanolic solutions of dithiol, and dispersion of CdS nanoparticles (ca. 3nm in diameter), the latter of which was prepared in A0T/H20/heptane w/o microemulsions. [Pg.219]

The same effect is seen when a non—aromatic cationic surfactant/nonionic surfactant system is used. Since the nonideality of mixed micelle formation in this case is due almost entirely to the electrostatic effects and not to any specific interactions between the dissimilar hydrophilic groups, the geometrical effect just discussed will cause the EO groups to be less compactly structured... [Pg.17]

The equilibrium in these systems above the cloud point then involves monomer-micelle equilibrium in the dilute phase and monomer in the dilute phase in equilibrium with the coacervate phase. Prediction o-f the distribution of surfactant component between phases involves modeling of both of these equilibrium processes (98). It should be kept in mind that the region under discussion here involves only a small fraction of the total phase space in the nonionic surfactant—water system (105). Other compositions may involve more than two equilibrium phases, liquid crystals, or other structures. As the temperature or surfactant composition or concentration is varied, these regions may be encroached upon, something that the surfactant technologist must be wary of when working with nonionic surfactant systems. [Pg.24]

Figures 7, 8 and 9 are plots at 25 C of specific conductance and density versus volume fraction of methanol in 2/1 triolein/ surfactant systems which are 4/1 molar ratios of 2-octanol to bis(2-ethylhexyl) sodium sulfosuccinate, triethylammonium linoleate and tetradecyldimethylammonium linoleate, respectively. For each surfactant system, a maximum for specific conductance and a minimum for density was observed at the same volume fraction, but this volume fraction of methanol varied between the three surfactant systems. At volume fractions of methanol above these abrupt changes, each system exhibited translucence, and it appears that gel-like structures form. These data are consistent for microemulsion structures that are based largely on geometric considerations (16-18). Figures 7, 8 and 9 are plots at 25 C of specific conductance and density versus volume fraction of methanol in 2/1 triolein/ surfactant systems which are 4/1 molar ratios of 2-octanol to bis(2-ethylhexyl) sodium sulfosuccinate, triethylammonium linoleate and tetradecyldimethylammonium linoleate, respectively. For each surfactant system, a maximum for specific conductance and a minimum for density was observed at the same volume fraction, but this volume fraction of methanol varied between the three surfactant systems. At volume fractions of methanol above these abrupt changes, each system exhibited translucence, and it appears that gel-like structures form. These data are consistent for microemulsion structures that are based largely on geometric considerations (16-18).
At very low surface coverage at the air—water interface, a phase transition is thought to occur where the sparsely covered surface forms aggregated structures on the surface 122 ) m It would be of great scientific interest to study this transition for mixed surfactant systems. The surface tension would need to be measured very accurately and very pure surfactants would need to be used for this study. [Pg.330]

Lindman, B., Carlsson, A., Gerdes, S., Karlstroem, G., Piculell, L., Thalberg, K., et al. (1993). Polysaccharide-surfactant systems interactions, phase diagrams and novel gels. In Dickinson, E., Walstra, P. (Eds). Food Colloids and Polymers Structure and Dynamics, Cambridge, UK Royal Society of Chemistry, pp. 113-125. [Pg.226]

T1he importance of association structures of amphiphilic molecules for interfacial phenomena has been realized in the last ten years with the rapid progress of knowledge concerning the structure of biomembranes and the discovery of the pronounced influence of surfactant association structures on the properties of disperse systems. [Pg.5]

I. S. Barnes, P. J. Derian, S. T. Hyde, B. W. Ninham, and T. N. Zemb. A disordered lamellar structure in the isotropic-phase of a ternary double-chain surfactant system. J. Physique, 51(22) 2605-2628, 1990. [Pg.424]


See other pages where Surfactants system structure is mentioned: [Pg.87]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.481]    [Pg.379]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.232]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.194]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.327]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.86]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.283]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.51]   


SEARCH



Structure surfactants

Structured surfactant

Surfactant systems

© 2024 chempedia.info