Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Surface states, comparison, different

Although by now a large number of electrochemical systems have been examined using both SERS and IRRAS, including some common to both techniques (2b), the conditions employed are usually sufficiently different (e.g. disparate surface state, adsorbate concentrations) so to preclude a quantitative comparison of the spectral responses. One further hindrance to such comparisons is that it usually is difficult to remove entirely the contribution to the infrared spectra from solution-phase species. Two types of approaches are commonly used in IRRAS with this objective in mind. Firstly, modulating the infrared beam between s- and p-polarization can achieve a measure of demarcation between surface and bulk-phase components since considerably greater infrared absorption will occur for the former, but not the latter, species for p- versus s-polarized light (2.81. However, a complication is that the "surface... [Pg.304]

Besides the effects of different surface dipoles, the concentration and energy position of surface states depend also largely on surface orientation with the result that the electric excess charge in surface states can be very different on different surfaces. This is indicated in Figure 3 by a comparison between the flat band situation and the situation at equal electrode potential for different surfaces. Case (a) is a surface free of surface... [Pg.2]

Fig. 6.13. Anodic current vs. potential curves for the process of BH4 ions oxidation on the bulk Cu electrode (curve 1 for comparison see curve 2 registered in the same conditions without BH4 ions), on the initial Ti02 electrodes (curve 7 for Ti02 with Nd = 10 19 cm 3 curve 8 for Ti02 with Nd 1018 cm 3) and on the Ti02 electrodes surface modified with different concentration of Cu (curve 3 - 1018 atoms/cm2, curves 4,5 - 1016 atoms/cm2, curve 6 - 1015 atoms/cm2). The values of Nd for Ti02 were 1018 cm 3 (curve 5) and 1019 cm 3 (curves 3,4,6). Curve 9 was obtained with the use of represented electrical circuit modeling the system Ti02 - Cu particles - electrolyte (D - solid-state Schottky diode R - electrical resistor WE, RE and CE - working, reference and counter electrodes, correspondingly). Electrolyte 0.1 M NaBH4 + 0.1 M NaOH. The potential sweep rate is 5 mV/s. Fig. 6.13. Anodic current vs. potential curves for the process of BH4 ions oxidation on the bulk Cu electrode (curve 1 for comparison see curve 2 registered in the same conditions without BH4 ions), on the initial Ti02 electrodes (curve 7 for Ti02 with Nd = 10 19 cm 3 curve 8 for Ti02 with Nd 1018 cm 3) and on the Ti02 electrodes surface modified with different concentration of Cu (curve 3 - 1018 atoms/cm2, curves 4,5 - 1016 atoms/cm2, curve 6 - 1015 atoms/cm2). The values of Nd for Ti02 were 1018 cm 3 (curve 5) and 1019 cm 3 (curves 3,4,6). Curve 9 was obtained with the use of represented electrical circuit modeling the system Ti02 - Cu particles - electrolyte (D - solid-state Schottky diode R - electrical resistor WE, RE and CE - working, reference and counter electrodes, correspondingly). Electrolyte 0.1 M NaBH4 + 0.1 M NaOH. The potential sweep rate is 5 mV/s.
The existence of additional occupied states of Mo character, located above the O 2sp derived valence region, is relevant for the interpretation of experimental photoemission spectra of molybdenum oxide surfaces. According to the results of the cluster studies additional photoemission intensity above the valence band region may be indicative of chemical reduction of the metal centers, leading to lower oxidation states, where the effect can be introduced by oxygen vacancies or by different chemical composition of the oxide. This has been verified in UPS experiments on differently prepared MoOsCOlO) surfaces in comparison with measurements of other single and mixed valency molybdenum oxide samples [212]. [Pg.186]

A priori, when the phonon relaxation is faster than the tunneling rates, thermodynamic equilibrium should hold at the temperature of the host reservoir. However, for the nano-junctions the local surface temperature may differ from the bulk equilibrium temperature. This is due to the Anderson orthogonality catastrophe (AOC)3 associated with interplay between the van der Waals and the electrostatic forces. The electron tunneling affects the overlap between differently shifted phonon ground states of the surface. The faster the tunneling rate, the closer is the phononic overlap to zero, and that hinders relaxation of the surface temperature. AOC presents the mechanism also affecting the thermal state of the electronic reservoir due to electron-phonon coupling. In Sec. 3, from comparison of our theoretical I-V curves at different electron-phonon temperatures and the experimental data [Park 2000] we infer that AOC exists. [Pg.643]

In anthracene crystal as it follows from data collected in Table 3.1 the distance between a, b plane is large in comparison with distance between nearest molecules in this plane. As the result, as we already mentioned in Section 9.1, the interactions between molecules in different planes is smaller than interaction between molecules inside the same plane. This means that anthracene crystal the same as other crystals of the its family have layered structure which we explicitly take into account in microscopical theory of surface states. We will use the same Hamiltonian (2.2) as we used in consideration of bulk states in simplest Heitler-London approximation. However, now we have to take into account that translational symmetry exists only along the surface of crystal which we assume parallel to a, b plane. In an infinite crystal the diagonalization of Hamiltonian leads to two exciton bands Eit2(k), so that the general pattern of levels is the one shown schematically in Fig. 12.4b. [Pg.337]

Table I. Comparison of Surface States Resulting from Different SiC Preparation Methods... Table I. Comparison of Surface States Resulting from Different SiC Preparation Methods...
The results presented in this chapter clearly demonstrate that the state of the siuface is a dynamic process depending on kinetics of surface transformation temperatiue, reactant concentration, time on stream, even on the reactor used, all of which determine the structure and composition of the Pt surface. In short T-O-S experiments, in which the surface is not equilibrated, the conditions can be different than in long-term experiments, where the surface reaches a quasiequilibrium state. Comparison of results from different research groups requires detailed examination of all the conditions used to draw valid conclusions. Although this is a common-sense conclusion, researchers often compare results at quite different conditions, e.g., single crystal versus supported catalysts, to cite a common example. Often-heated arguments about which interpretation is the correct one are just a reflection of the surfaces being under different states due to the use of different experimental parameters. [Pg.442]

XPS analysis of the SiC surfaces polished with different slurries allowed the different oxides formed on the surface to be characterized. The chemical state of carbon atoms at the SiC surfaces were analyzed in detail using the high-resolution XPS spectra, shown in Figure 7.2. Table 7.3 gives a comparison of the surface concentrations of the different carbonaceous species at the polished SiC surfaces. The C/Si atomic ratio was determined from the surface scan data. [Pg.173]

Nanocatalysis is a rapidly growing field which involves the use of nanostruc-tured materials such as NPs, nanofilms, and nano porous solids, as catalysts. In comparison with their bulk counterparts, the nano-structured catalytic materials possess high surface-to-volume ratio, high surface energy, and different electronic state, which result in unique catalytic activity in many reactions. Conventionally, soHd-supported nano-metal particles (NMPs) have been widely studied in various reactions. Besides the specific function of a soHd base to build the catalytically... [Pg.22]


See other pages where Surface states, comparison, different is mentioned: [Pg.457]    [Pg.321]    [Pg.1612]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.449]    [Pg.380]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.542]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.449]    [Pg.231]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.323]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.342]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.329]    [Pg.585]    [Pg.323]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.800]    [Pg.2013]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.386]    [Pg.781]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.268]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.1297]   


SEARCH



Surface states

© 2024 chempedia.info