Surface properties bulk phase changes

Interface The boundary between two immiscible phases, sometimes including a thin layer at the boundary within which the properties of one bulk phase change over to become the properties of the other bulk phase. An interfacial layer of finite specified thickness may be defined. When one of the phases is a gas, the term surface is frequently used. 

However, the correlation of the electrical properties of the bulk phase with the catalytic properties of the essentially heterogeneous catalyst surface is a classical difficulty. This may be one of the reasons why no general correlation between these properties is found when a variety of different metal oxide catalysts is compared. A close relationship is often shown, on the other hand, when a particular catalyst is modified or doped with minor amounts of an additional metal oxide. It is very likely that the correlation is successful in this case, because the nature of surface sites is not essentially changed. 

Castorina et al (Refs 164 180) studied the surface activity of one-micron size a-HMX as a function of Co60 gamma dose in vacuo and vapors of H20, NO and N02. The production of polar surface adducts suggests that the mechanism of energy transfer from the bulk of the substrate to the surface-vapor phase interface be postulated to apply to crystalline organic substrates. By this mechanism changes in surface properties can be achieved without any serious... 

We consider a multicomponent system consisting of two phases separated by a planar surface in a container of fixed volume. The surface has some thickness, as shown by the slant lines in Figure 13.1. We have already stated that some properties, such as the density or the concentration of the components, change rapidly but continuously across the surface. Such behavior is illustrated by the curve in Figure 13.2, where l is measured along a line normal to the surface. Imaginary boundaries (a and b in Figs. 13.1 and 13.2) are placed in the system so that each boundary lies close to the real surface but at a position within the bulk phases where the properties are those of the bulk phases. The system is thus made to consist of three... 

The quantity within the large parentheses and the derivative, (< 2/bulk phases and can therefore be evaluated. If we then determine the change of the surface tension with the composition of the double-primed phase, the value of r2(1) can be determined. When the primed phase is a gas and the molar volume of the gas is very large with respect to that of the other phase, Equation (13.64) simplifies to... 

The interfacial layer is the inhomogeneous space region intermediate between two bulk phases in contact, and where properties are notably different from, but related to, the properties of the bulk phases (see Figure 6.1). Some of these properties are composition, molecular density, orientation or conformation, charge density, pressure tensor, and electron density [2], The interfacial properties change in the direction normal to the surface (see Figure 6.1). Complex profiles of interfacial properties take place in the case of multicomponent systems with coexisting bulk phases where attractive/repulsive molecular interactions involve adsorption or depletion of one or several components. 

Not to be forgotten is the assumption that neither the presence of the electrolyte nor the interface itself changes the dielectric medium properties of the aqueous phase. It is assumed to behave as a dielectric continuum with a constant relative dielectric permittivity equal to the value of the bulk phase. The electrolyte is presumed to be made up of point charges, i.e. ions with no size, and responds to the presence of the charged interface in a competitive way described by statistical mechanics. Counterions are drawn to the surface by electrostatic attraction while thermal fluctuations tend to disperse them into solution, surface co-ions are repelled electrostatically and also tend to be dispersed by thermal motion, but are attracted to the accumulated cluster of counterions found near the surface. The end result of this electrical-thermodynamic conflict is an ion distribution which can be represented (approximately) by a Boltzmann distribution dependent on the average electrostatic potential at an arbitrary point multiplied by the valency of individual species, v/. 

In all of these systems, certain aspects of the reactions can be uniquely related to the properties of a surface. Surface properties may include those representative of the bulk material, ones unique to the interface because of the abrupt change in density of the material, or properties arising from the two-dimensional nature of the surface. In this article, the structural, thermodynamic, electrical, optical, and dynamic properties of solid surfaces are discussed in instances where properties are different from those of the bulk material. Predominantly, this discussion focuses on metal surfaces and their interaction with gas-phase atoms and molecules. The majority of fundamental knowledge of molecular-level surface properties has been derived from such low surface area systems. The solid-gas interface of high surface area materials has received much attention in the context of separation science, however, will not be discussed in detail here. The solid-liquid interface has primarily been treated from an electrochemical perspective and is discussed elsewhere see Electrochemistry Applications in Inorganic Chemistry). The surface properties of liquids (liquid-gas interface) are largely unexplored on the molecular level experimental techniques for their study have begun only recently to be developed. The information presented here is a summary of concepts a more complete description can be found in one of several texts which discuss surface properties in more detail. ... 

Fat or lipid materials and calcium-lipid complexes also contribute to fouling and flux decline in membrane processing of milk or whey. The transport properties of the feed stream and the changes they undergo as the concentration process proceeds also affect the rate of permeation. At high concentrations, the increased fluid viscosity near the membrane surface limits back-diffusion of solids from the polarized layer to the bulk phase, thereby, depressing flux rate [46]. 

---