Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Acidic surface groups

Various workers have made suggestions on the possible effects of surface treatment which include removal of a surface layer, formation of a surface group, acid/base interaction,... [Pg.357]

Structural considerations aside, surface group acidity can be characterized by the following equilibria ... [Pg.286]

Once a metal surface has been conditioned by one of the above methods, a coupling agent composed of a bifimctional acid—methacrylate similar to a dentin adhesive is appHed. This coupling material is usually suppHed as a solvent solution that is painted over the conditioned metal surface. The acidic functional group of the coupling molecule interacts with the metal oxide surface while the methacrylate functional group of the molecule copolymerizes with the resin cement or restorative material placed over it (266,267). [Pg.493]

The lowest wettable surface known = 6 dyne/cm) is a monolayer of perfluoro-launc acid on platinum, whose surface is made up of closely packed CF3 groups [20] Fluonnated graphite, (C2FJ and (CF) , also have surface tensions approachmg 6 dyne/cm [21] Perfluorinated materials, however, are not required tor low surface energies only the outermost surface groups must be perfluorinated [20, 22]... [Pg.983]

The physicochemical properties of carbon are highly dependent on its surface structure and chemical composition [66—68], The type and content of surface species, particle shape and size, pore-size distribution, BET surface area and pore-opening are of critical importance in the use of carbons as anode material. These properties have a major influence on (9IR, reversible capacity <2R, and the rate capability and safety of the battery. The surface chemical composition depends on the raw materials (carbon precursors), the production process, and the history of the carbon. Surface groups containing H, O, S, N, P, halogens, and other elements have been identified on carbon blacks [66, 67]. There is also ash on the surface of carbon and this typically contains Ca, Si, Fe, Al, and V. Ash and acidic oxides enhance the adsorption of the more polar compounds and electrolytes [66]. [Pg.430]

A modified latex composition contains a phosphorus surface group. Such a latex is formed by emulsion polymerization of unsaturated synthetic monomers in the presence of a phosponate or a phosphate which is intimately bound to the surface of the latex. Thus, a modified latex containing 46% solids was prepared by emulsion polymerization of butadiene, styrene, acrylic acid-styrene seed latex, and a phosphonate comonomer in H20 in the presence of phosphated alkylphenol ethoxylate at 90°C. The modified latex is useful as a coating for substrates and as a binder in aqueous systems containing inorganic fillers employed in paper coatings, carpet backings, and wallboards [119]. [Pg.602]

In 1997, a Chinese research group [78] used the colloidal solution of 70-nm-sized carboxylated latex particles as a subphase and spread mixtures of cationic and other surfactants at the air-solution interface. If the pH was sufficiently low (1.5-3.0), the electrostatic interaction between the polar headgroups of the monolayer and the surface groups of the latex particles was strong enough to attract the latex to the surface. A fairly densely packed array of particles could be obtained if a 2 1 mixture of octadecylamine and stearic acid was spread at the interface. The particle films could be transferred onto solid substrates using the LB technique. The structure was studied using transmission electron microscopy. [Pg.217]

The mechanism of anodic oxidation of CO at polycrystalline Au remains uncertain. Several groups have reported that the voltammetry of Au in acidic electrolytes is straightforward, with a well-formed oxidation wave/peak [Stonehart, 1966 Gibbs et al., 1977 Kita et al., 1985 Sun et al., 1999]. There is, however, no voltammetric evidence for the adsorption of CO on the Au surface, and spectroscopic studies indicate only a weak interaction of CO with poly crystalline Au surfaces in acidic solutions [Kunimatsu et al., 1986 Cuesta et al., 2003]. Moreover, there is little evidence for the formation of oxidizing species at the potential where the oxidation process is observed. Certainly, the oxidation of CO occurs at a potential over 500 mV less positive than that where bulk Au oxide is formed, and, indeed, the formation of this oxide strongly... [Pg.571]

In a concurrently published report [160] Crooks and coworkers reported similar MUA-SAMs modified by covalent linking of hyperbranched macromolecules. These films containing a high density of surface carboxylic acid groups could selectively bind metal ions or undergo chemical modification. [Pg.68]

Polystyrene Latexes. The polystyrene latexes used were the mono-disperse LS-1102-A, LS-1103-A, and LS-1166-B (Dow Chemical Co.) with average particle diameters of 190, 400, and llOOnm, respectively. The latexes were cleaned by ion exchange with mixed Dcwex 50W-Dowex 1 resin (9). The double-distilled and deionized (DDI) water used had a conductivity of 4x10 ohm- cm-. The surface groups of the ion-exchanged latexes determined by conductometric titration (10) were strong-acid sulfates the surface charge densities were 1.35, 3.00 and 5.95 jiC/cm, respectively. [Pg.78]

Structure controlled dendritic polymers that have been studied using gel electrophoresis generally behave as mimics of either proteins or nucleic acids, and possess similar ionic groups such as -NH3 , -COO , or P04 functionality. Dendrimer structures may be widely modified as a function of their interior composition and as well as the nature of their surface groups. Depending on their structure, the influence of pH may vary dramatically for different dendrimers. [Pg.241]

These dendritic boxes (Figure 13.7) were synthesized by the conjugation of a chiral shell of protected amino acids onto a flexible polypropylene imine) dendrimer with 64 amino end groups. In solution, the shell was highly hydrogen-bonded and dense-packed, displaying a solid-phase behavior, which was indicated by the low NMR relaxation time of the surface groups [11]. [Pg.316]

Much information on the functional surface groups on sulfides is not yet available. Recent studies by Ronngren et al. (1991) gave the following acidity constants for... [Pg.66]

Blocking of surface groups by hydrophobic moieties of fatty acids, humic acids or macromolecules... [Pg.163]

In Fig. 5.5a a simple scheme of reaction steps is proposed. Some of the assumptions of our model are summarized in Table 5.1. The short-hand representation of a surface site is a simplification that does not take into account either detailed structural aspects of the oxide surface or the oxidation state of the metal ion and its coordination number. It implies (model assumption 2 in Table 5.1) that all functional surface groups, such as those in a cross-linked polyhydroxo-oxo acid, are treated as if they were identical. [Pg.166]

Estimate the variation of surface charge of a hematite suspension (same charac-teristics as that used in Example 7.2) to which various concentrations of a ligand H2U (that forms bidentate surface complexes with the Fe(III) surface groups, FelT such a ligand could be oxalate, phtalate, salicylate or serve as a simplified model for a humic acid we assume acidity constants and surface complex formation constants representative for such ligands. The problem is essentially the same as that discussed in Example 5.1. We recalculate here for pH = 6.5. [Pg.260]

Different modifications of hydrous oxides, even if present in solution with the same surface area concentrations, are characterized by significantly different reactivities (e.g., dissolution rate). This depends above all on the different coordination geometry of the surface groups. For a given pH (on surface protonation) the reactivity of a Fem-center is likely to increase with the number of terminal ligands (Wehrli et al., 1990), i.e., groups such as -Fe-OH are less acid and react faster than... [Pg.323]

Chan (Chapter 6) presents a simple graphical method for estimating the free energy of EDL formation at the oxide-water interface with an amphoteric model for the acidity of surface groups. Subject to the assumptions of the EDL model, the graphical method allows a comparison of the magnitudes of the chemical and coulombic components of surface reactions. The analysis also illustrates the relationship between model parameter values and the deviation of surface potential from the Nernst equation. [Pg.5]

Gouy-Chapman, Stern, and triple layer). Methods which have been used for determining thermodynamic constants from experimental data for surface hydrolysis reactions are examined critically. One method of linear extrapolation of the logarithm of the activity quotient to zero surface charge is shown to bias the values which are obtained for the intrinsic acidity constants of the diprotic surface groups. The advantages of a simple model based on monoprotic surface groups and a Stern model of the electric double layer are discussed. The model is physically plausible, and mathematically consistent with adsorption and surface potential data. [Pg.54]

In order to maintain the complexity of the model at a level consistent with the resolution of the experimental data, the reactivity of these surface groups has been described by relatively simple models (i) as diprotic weak acids, and (ii) as monoprotic... [Pg.59]

Diprotic Surface Groups. According to the diprotic model, the surface is represented as an ensemble of identical diprotic weak acid groups, which react according to ... [Pg.61]

The representation of surface groups as diprotic weak acids is appealing because it includes a modest degree of complexity (two acidity constants), allows convenient representation of the condition of zero surface excess of hydrogen ion, and is still quite manageable mathematically. However, it must be borne in mind that this model is still a grossly simplified representation of the actual surface. It remains to be shown that this simplification is significantly better than any other simplification. [Pg.61]


See other pages where Acidic surface groups is mentioned: [Pg.226]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.326]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.326]    [Pg.276]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.578]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.364]    [Pg.723]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.599]    [Pg.599]    [Pg.679]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.446]    [Pg.931]    [Pg.407]    [Pg.305]    [Pg.214]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.368]    [Pg.397]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.76]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.22 , Pg.26 , Pg.37 , Pg.132 , Pg.134 , Pg.143 , Pg.144 , Pg.150 , Pg.160 , Pg.161 , Pg.182 , Pg.192 , Pg.205 , Pg.231 , Pg.237 , Pg.241 , Pg.245 , Pg.256 , Pg.257 , Pg.260 , Pg.263 , Pg.297 , Pg.299 , Pg.302 , Pg.304 , Pg.305 , Pg.316 , Pg.317 , Pg.330 , Pg.335 , Pg.345 , Pg.347 , Pg.348 , Pg.361 , Pg.366 , Pg.367 ]




SEARCH



Acid surface

Surface groupings

Surface groups

© 2024 chempedia.info