Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Surface competition between

Bonn M, Denzler DN, Eunk S, Wolf M. 2000. Ultrafast electron dynamics at metal surfaces Competition between electron-phonon coupling and hot-electron transport. Phys Rev B 61 1101-1105. [Pg.404]

An enforced reduction in the concentration of ZDDPs and MoS compounds which can be included in additive packages for low SAPs applications means that consideration must be given to how to maintain wear protection and antioxidancy at an acceptable level. Normal phosphorus levels are of the order of 0.12% in the finished, formulated lubricant. If levels of 0.08% phosphorus are required, then this poses few problems since such formulations have already been well tried in certain markets. If levels of 0.05% phosphorus are stipulated, then formulating to meet wear targets becomes more difficult and interactions between ZDDPs and other additives present as well as surface competition between additives become critical. [Pg.103]

Various functional forms for / have been proposed either as a result of empirical observation or in terms of specific models. A particularly important example of the latter is that known as the Langmuir adsorption equation [2]. By analogy with the derivation for gas adsorption (see Section XVII-3), the Langmuir model assumes the surface to consist of adsorption sites, each having an area a. All adsorbed species interact only with a site and not with each other, and adsorption is thus limited to a monolayer. Related lattice models reduce to the Langmuir model under these assumptions [3,4]. In the case of adsorption from solution, however, it seems more plausible to consider an alternative phrasing of the model. Adsorption is still limited to a monolayer, but this layer is now regarded as an ideal two-dimensional solution of equal-size solute and solvent molecules of area a. Thus lateral interactions, absent in the site picture, cancel out in the ideal solution however, in the first version is a properly of the solid lattice, while in the second it is a properly of the adsorbed species. Both models attribute differences in adsorption behavior entirely to differences in adsorbate-solid interactions. Both present adsorption as a competition between solute and solvent. [Pg.391]

Fig. 3. Two-dimensional schematic illustrating the distribution of Hquid between the Plateau borders and the films separating three adjacent gas bubbles. The radius of curvature r of the interface at the Plateau border depends on the Hquid content and the competition between surface tension and interfacial forces, (a) Flat films and highly curved borders occur for dry foams with strong interfacial forces, (b) Nearly spherical bubbles occur for wet foams where... Fig. 3. Two-dimensional schematic illustrating the distribution of Hquid between the Plateau borders and the films separating three adjacent gas bubbles. The radius of curvature r of the interface at the Plateau border depends on the Hquid content and the competition between surface tension and interfacial forces, (a) Flat films and highly curved borders occur for dry foams with strong interfacial forces, (b) Nearly spherical bubbles occur for wet foams where...
The results obtained demonstrate competition between the entropy favouring binding at bumps and the potential most likely to favour binding at dips of the surface. For a range of pairwise-additive, power-law interactions, it was found that the effect of the potential dominates, but in the (non-additive) limit of a surface of much higher dielectric constant than in solution the entropy effects win. Thus, the preferential binding of the polymer to the protuberances of a metallic surface was predicted [22]. Besides, this theory indirectly assumes the occupation of bumps by the weakly attracted neutral macromolecules capable of covalent interaction with surface functions. [Pg.140]

The solvents themselves are adsorbed on the electrode surface, as is shown by the capacitance-potential graphs illustrated in Fig. 9 (Payne, 1967, 1970) potassium hexafluorophosphate, the electrolyte in each of the solvents, is thought to be adsorbed only very weakly. The solvents show somewhat differing curves and the peaks have been interpreted both in terms of competition between the solvent and anions for sites at the surface and also in terms of solvent reorientation. Ethers are adsorbed from the amide solvents most strongly at the potentials around the peaks and this has been postulated to be due to an increase in freedom for the solvent to rotate at these potentials (Dutkiewicz and Parsons, 1966). [Pg.188]

A disadvantage of this technique is that isotopic labeling can cause unwanted perturbations to the competition between pathways through kinetic isotope effects. Whereas the Born-Oppenheimer potential energy surfaces are not affected by isotopic substitution, rotational and vibrational levels become more closely spaced with substitution of heavier isotopes. Consequently, the rate of reaction in competing pathways will be modified somewhat compared to the unlabeled reaction. This effect scales approximately as the square root of the ratio of the isotopic masses, and will be most pronounced for deuterium or... [Pg.220]

After reduction and surface characterization, the iron sample was moved to the reactor and brought to the reaction conditions (7 atm, 3 1 H2 C0, 540 K). Once the reactor temperature, gas flow and pressure were stabilized ( 10 min.) the catalytic activity and selectivity were monitored by on-line gas chromatography. As previously reported, the iron powder exhibited an induction period in which the catalytic activity increased with time. The catalyst reached steady state activity after approximately 4 hours on line. This induction period is believed to be the result of a competition for surface carbon between bulk carbide formation and hydrocarbon synthesis.(6,9) Steady state synthesis is reached only after the surface region of the catalyst is fully carbided. [Pg.127]

The observation of negative apparent activation energy can most simply be interpreted in terms of the competition between the adsorption and desorption of methylacetylene on the surface. This qualitative explanation is illustrated in Figure 3, where the steady-state production of trimethylbenzene is compared with the TPD trace of methylacetylene. The fall off in steady state cyclotrimerization rate matches the tail of the desorption spectrum and illustrates the role of reactant desorption at higher temperatiu-es controlling the availability of alkyne monomers and thus the overall cyclotrimerization rate in this temperatime/pressure regime. [Pg.301]

Stationary concentration of adsorbed acceptor particles of O- and N-atoms on a film of zinc oxide is attained for the most part due to the competition between the chemisorbtion of particles and their interaction, i. e. mutual recombination on the adsorbent surface, and with free atoms attacking the adsorbed layer of the adsorbent from outside. [Pg.198]

The study [39] shows that similar equation is valid for adsorption of NH- and NH2-radicaIs, too. There are a lot of experimental data lending support to the validity of the proposed two-phase scheme of free radical chemisorbtion on semiconductor oxides. It is worth noting that the stationary concentration of free radicals during the experiments conducted was around 10 to 10 particles per 1 cm of gas volume, i.e. the number of particle incident on 1 cm of adsorbent surface was only 10 per second. Regarding the number of collisions of molecules of initial substance, it was around 10 for experiments with acetone photolysis or pyrolysis provided that acetone vapour pressure was 0,1 to 0,01 Torr. Thus, adsorbed radicals easily interact at moderate temperatures not only with each other but also with molecules which reduces the stationary concentration of adsorbed radicals to an even greater extent. As we know now [45] this concentration is established due to the competition between the adsorption of radicals and their interaction with each other as well as with molecules of initial substance in the adsorbed layer (ketones, hydrazines, etc.). [Pg.204]

The study of how fluids interact with porous solids is itself an important area of research [6], The introduction of wall forces and the competition between fluid-fluid and fluid-wall forces, leads to interesting surface-driven phase changes, and the departure of the physical behavior of a fluid from the normal equation of state is often profound [6-9]. Studies of gas-liquid phase equilibria in restricted geometries provide information on finite-size effects and surface forces, as well as the thermodynamic behavior of constrained fluids (i.e., shifts in phase coexistence curves). Furthermore, improved understanding of changes in phase transitions and associated critical points in confined systems allow for material science studies of pore structure variables, such as pore size, surface area/chemistry and connectivity [6, 23-25],... [Pg.305]

The FTIR data recorded upon N0/02 adsorption in the presence of C02 showed that bidentate carbonates were immediately formed along with nitrite species. By increasing the time of contact, carbonates were partially displaced, while nitrites evolved to nitrate species [52], Notably, the amounts of surface nitrites present at each contact time are lower in the presence of C02 than in its absence. This indicates that C02 competes for the surface oxygen sites able to give nitrites at the beginning of the adsorption process in fact, after several minutes of exposure to the N0/02/C02 mixture, the amount of nitrates stored was comparable to that obtained in the absence of C02. In conclusion, while in the presence of C02 the nitrite route is inhibited to some extent due to the competition between NO and C02 for the surface oxygen sites of the Ba phase, the nitrate route is only marginally affected by the C02 presence, if any. [Pg.190]


See other pages where Surface competition between is mentioned: [Pg.390]    [Pg.529]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.390]    [Pg.529]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.2808]    [Pg.2935]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.432]    [Pg.429]    [Pg.467]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.537]    [Pg.268]    [Pg.967]    [Pg.615]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.447]    [Pg.243]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.392]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.254]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.244]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.572]    [Pg.223]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.354]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.301]    [Pg.272]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.236 , Pg.237 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info