Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Supercritical fluids continuous extraction

Extractions can be carried out in dynamic, static, or combination modes. In the dynamic mode, the supercritical fluid continuously flows through the sample in the extraction vessel and out the restrictor to the trapping vessel. In the static mode, the supercritical fluid circulates in a loop containing the extraction vessel for some period of time before being released through the restrictor to the trapping vessel. In the combination mode, a static extraction is performed for some period of time, followed by a dynamic extraction. [Pg.615]

The use of inverse micelles and microemulsions of AOT in supercritical or near supercritical fluids as extractants for valuable hydrophilic substances such as proteins continues to develop. FT-IR studies of the pressure dependence of the water core structure in various parts of the phase diagrams of such systems have been described (89). [Pg.14]

In this area, research work is in progress on the development of continuous supercritical fluid (SCF) extraction processes for solid feeds. Finally, for numerous natural substances the construction of smaller production plants is expected in the near future. The de-fatting and cholesterol reduction of egg yolk powder is shown as an example in Figure 1 (Quirin, K.-W. Gerard, D. FLAVEX Naturextrakte GmbH, Rehlingen, personal communication, 1988). [Pg.479]

The use of supercritical fluids to extract the cyclic ethers from the polymerizate is described. In one example it is related that a charge of THF-ethylene oxide polymerizate containing 8% cyclic ethers is contacted in batch continuous mode with propylene at 100 °C and 83 atm. The residual polymerizate contains 2% cyclic ether content. No gas volume is given in this example or in the three other examples with other polymers and copolymers extracted using supercritical ethylene and propylene. Thus, no distribution coefficients can be calculated to determine the potential industrial value of this patent. [Pg.443]

Removing an analyte from a matrix using supercritical fluid extraction (SEE) requires knowledge about the solubiUty of the solute, the rate of transfer of the solute from the soHd to the solvent phase, and interaction of the solvent phase with the matrix (36). These factors collectively control the effectiveness of the SEE process, if not of the extraction process in general. The range of samples for which SEE has been appHed continues to broaden. Apphcations have been in the environment, food, and polymers (37). [Pg.242]

General trends are focused on reduced-solvent extractions or adsorption-based methods — enviromnentaUy friendly solvents for both solid and liquid samples. In recent decades, advanced techniques like supercritical fluid extraction (SFE), ° pressurized liquid extraction (PLE)," microwave-assisted extraction (MAE), ultrasound-assisted extraction, countercurrent continued extraction (www.niroinc.com), solid... [Pg.304]

Supercritical fluid extraction can be performed in a static system with the attainment of a steady-state equilibrium or in a continuous leaching mode (dynamic mode) for which equilibrium is unlikely to be obtained (257,260). In most instances the dynamic approach has been preferred, although the selection of the method probably depends just as much on the properties of the matrix as those of the analyte. The potential for saturation of a component with limited solubility in a static solvent pool may hinder complete recovery of the analyte. In a dynamic system, the analyte is continuously exposed to a fresh stream of solvent, increasing the rate of extraction from the matrix. In a static systea... [Pg.409]

Figure 8.6 Apparatus used for saeple preparation involving solvent extraction. A, heavier-than-water continuous liquid-liquid extractor B, pressurized Soxhlet extractor for use with supercritical fluids C, Kudema-Danlsh evaporative concentrator 0, autonated evaporative concentrator. Figure 8.6 Apparatus used for saeple preparation involving solvent extraction. A, heavier-than-water continuous liquid-liquid extractor B, pressurized Soxhlet extractor for use with supercritical fluids C, Kudema-Danlsh evaporative concentrator 0, autonated evaporative concentrator.
Principles and Characteristics Water is an interesting alternative for an extraction fluid because of its unique properties and nontoxic characteristics. Two states of water have so far been used in the continuous extraction mode, namely subcritical (at 100 °C < T < 374 °C and sufficient pressure to maintain water in the liquid state) and supercritical (T>374°C, p>218 bar). Unfortunately, supercritical water is highly corrosive, and the high temperatures required may lead to thermal degradation of less stable organic compounds. However, water is also an excellent medium for extraction below its critical temperature [412], Subcritical water exhibits lower corrosive effects. [Pg.100]

Studies designed to improve the determination of environmental contaminants will continue to provide refinements and improvements in the determination of acrylonitrile. The current high level of activity in supercritical fluid extraction of solid and semisolid samples should yield improved recoveries and sensitivities for the determination of acrylonitrile in solid wastes, and the compound should be amenable to supercritical fluid chromatographic analysis. Immunoassay analysis is another area of intense current activity from which substantial advances in the determination of acrylonitrile in environmental samples can be anticipated (Vanderlaan et al. 1988). [Pg.96]

Another solution to the problem of ionic liquid loss to the organic phase is to extract the product from the ionic liquid using a supercritical fluid (See Chapter 8, Section 8.2.2.3). It has been demonstrated that this can be done continuously for a variety of reactions including the hydroformylation of long chain alkenes [20], and that neither the ionic liquid nor the catalyst are leached to significant extents. The only problem here is the high pressures involved (see section 9.8). [Pg.245]

Sun M and Temelli F. 2006. Supercritical carbon dioxide extraction of carotenoids from carrot using canola oil as a continuous co-solvent. J Supercrit Fluids 37(3) 397-408. [Pg.269]

On-going studies to improve analytical methods for hexachloroethane and related compounds include the EPA "Master Analytical Scheme" being developed for organic compounds in water (Michael et al. 1988) and the research in supercritical fluid extraction (Lopez-Avila et al. 1991 Wieboldt et al. 1988). Research continues on improving extraction, concentration, and elution techniques, and detection devices (Eichelberger et al. [Pg.143]

Dynamic headspace-extraction stripping and purge-and-trap methodology are used most often for determination of M-hcxanc in water and hazardous wastes. Dynamic headspace extraction techniques have been applied to water samples (Roberts and Burton 1994) and sediment (Bianchi et al. 1991). Detection limits of 0.5 g/L were reported for lake water (Roberts and Burton 1994) and 20 ng/kg (ppt) for sediment (Bianchi et al. 1991). Supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) is a relatively new technique that has been applied to -hcxane in soil (Yang et al. 1995). Membrane extraction of M-hexane from water samples has been developed to provide online, continuous monitoring (Wong et al. 1995 Xu and Mitra... [Pg.214]

Figure 28-14a shows how a supercritical fluid extraction can be carried out. Pressurized fluid is pumped through a heated extraction vessel. Fluid can be left in contact with the sample for some time or it can be pumped through continuously. At the outlet of the extraction vessel, the fluid flows through a capillary tube to release pressure. Exiting C02 evaporates, leaving extracted analyte in the collection vessel. Alternatively, the C02 can be bubbled through a solvent in the collection vessel to leave a solution of analyte. [Pg.656]

Decontamination of soils using supercritical fluids is an attractive process compared to extraction with liquid solvents because no toxic residue is left in the remediated soil and, in contrast to thermal desorption, the soils are not burned. In particular, typical industrial wastes such as PAHs, PCBs, and fuels can be removed easily [7 to 21]. The main applications are in preparation for analytical purposes, where supercritical fluid extraction acts as a concentration step which is much faster and cheaper than solvent-extraction. The main parameters for successful extraction are the water content of the soil, the type of soil, and the contaminating substances, the available particle-size distribution, and the content of plant material, which can act as adsorbent material and therefore prolong the extraction time. For industrial regeneration, further the amount of soil to be treated has to taken into account, because there exists, so far, no possibility of continuous input and output of solid material for high pressure extraction plants, so that the process has to be run discontinuously. [Pg.393]

Figure 9.6-3. Nearly continuous supercritical fluid extraction of green coffee beans according toEPANr. 0331852A2 [10]... Figure 9.6-3. Nearly continuous supercritical fluid extraction of green coffee beans according toEPANr. 0331852A2 [10]...

See other pages where Supercritical fluids continuous extraction is mentioned: [Pg.127]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.1554]    [Pg.300]    [Pg.1482]    [Pg.1060]    [Pg.354]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.323]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.452]    [Pg.317]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.698]    [Pg.415]    [Pg.539]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.215 ]




SEARCH



Continuous extraction

Extractants supercritical fluid

Fluid extraction

Supercritical extractants

Supercritical extraction

Supercritical fluid extraction

Supercritical fluid extraction fluids

© 2024 chempedia.info